Cannon Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 People who stay in the middle/outside lane for no reason should be blown up by rocket launchers strapped to the overhead signs. They do my ******g head in. I drive probs 1500 miles a week, to and from jobs all over the shire. I spend half my life sat behind some **** driving at 69mph. I'm a 85mph man. I find it safer because I'm going past all the nuggets festering at 70mph. And also because I'm not bunched up in the fantasy braking club that congregate up and down our great nations motorways. These guys, also, should be shot with the motorway rocket launchers. However, pushing in is my forte. There is absolutely no need to sit in the inside lane and que when there's a perfectly good outside lane I can push in, sneak past and carry on. And if the police ever stop me for it and fine me ill give them some proper ear ache. Do you often troll websites looking for a reaction? Seems a bit of a boring past time tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byjovecarruthers Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 I'm sure the cop getting the earache will cry himself to sleep, what with never having issued a fine to an ar*****e before! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gemini52 Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 I driving home today through liverpool,the on coming traffic had stopped,this youg girl in a golf pulled out of a side road and trys to push her wayin to the line of traffic,the guy behind was having none of it so she just stays there blocking the road,then the cheeky cow takes out her mobile and starts to text some one,the traffic moves off she sticks her nose in the air and pulls away not a thanks kiss or kiss my ****,as far as i am concerned it cant come sooner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 Only easy if you're dumb enough not to wear it! +1 some poor sod has to be paid to scrape you up if you are not wearing one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ack-ack Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 (edited) You can't fine someone for having bad manners!......and you can't legally punch them in the face either sadly. I'm pretty cool with the new fuzz driving offence list though most of the crimes become skills if executed with elan. Edited August 16, 2013 by ack-ack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 People who stay in the middle/outside lane for no reason should be blown up by rocket launchers strapped to the overhead signs. They do my ******g head in. I drive probs 1500 miles a week, to and from jobs all over the shire. I spend half my life sat behind some **** driving at 69mph. I'm a 85mph man. I find it safer because I'm going past all the nuggets festering at 70mph. And also because I'm not bunched up in the fantasy braking club that congregate up and down our great nations motorways. These guys, also, should be shot with the motorway rocket launchers. However, pushing in is my forte. There is absolutely no need to sit in the inside lane and queue when there's a perfectly good outside lane I can push in, sneak past and carry on. If the police ever stop me for it and fine me i'll give them some proper ear ache. Ah what it is to be perfect, a bit like troll feeding.......... I hope your driving is better than your spelling. I've corrected your spelling for you. Personally anyone doing 69 or 70 is fine with me, it's not their speed, it's their lane discipline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beeredup Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 Only easy if you're dumb enough not to wear it! +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeonblasterian Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 People who stay in the middle/outside lane for no reason should be blown up by rocket launchers strapped to the overhead signs. They do my ******g head in. I drive probs 1500 miles a week, to and from jobs all over the shire. I spend half my life sat behind some **** driving at 69mph. I'm a 85mph man. I find it safer because I'm going past all the nuggets festering at 70mph. And also because I'm not bunched up in the fantasy braking club that congregate up and down our great nations motorways. These guys, also, should be shot with the motorway rocket launchers. However, pushing in is my forte. There is absolutely no need to sit in the inside lane and que when there's a perfectly good outside lane I can push in, sneak past and carry on. And if the police ever stop me for it and fine me ill give them some proper ear ache. Nothing like putting yourself across as a hand job person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 Nothing like putting yourself across as a hand job person. Brilliant, and so understated in the way you put it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilberts1989 Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 (edited) If you don't drive like a tit then there is nothing to worry about How ever, it should become the law that you can knock cyclists off their bikes if they insist on not using the cycle lane provide by my road tax and think just because they own a road bike, that means they then have the right to ride in the middle of the road Edited August 17, 2013 by Gilberts1989 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 Agree with most of your post Gilberts. In fairness to cyclists, many are taught that way. I don't do much cycling but when I do, even round the village I have had a near miss or two every time I am out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lincs1963 Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 From the bbc Among the offences police are expected to focus on are: Driving too close to the vehicle in front Failing to give way at a junction (not requiring evasive action by another driver) Overtaking and pushing into a queue of traffic Being in the wrong lane and pushing into a queue on a roundabout Lane discipline, such as needlessly hogging the middle or outside lanes Inappropriate speed Wheel-spins, handbrake turns and other careless manoeuvres Ok I know some people hate queue jumpers, but seriously, fining them! Looks like some easy wins for plod! Petty? Do you actually have a driving license? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzy518 Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 People who stay in the middle/outside lane for no reason should be blown up by rocket launchers strapped to the overhead signs. They do my ******g head in. I drive probs 1500 miles a week, to and from jobs all over the shire. I spend half my life sat behind some **** driving at 69mph. I'm a 85mph man. I find it safer because I'm going past all the nuggets festering at 70mph. And also because I'm not bunched up in the fantasy braking club that congregate up and down our great nations motorways. These guys, also, should be shot with the motorway rocket launchers. However, pushing in is my forte. There is absolutely no need to sit in the inside lane and que when there's a perfectly good outside lane I can push in, sneak past and carry on. And if the police ever stop me for it and fine me ill give them some proper ear ache. People like you and your arrogant selfish attitude to driving kill people. I'd gladly not only confiscate your so called rocket launcher but your driving licence too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chr15j Posted August 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 People who stay in the middle/outside lane for no reason should be blown up by rocket launchers strapped to the overhead signs. They do my ******g head in. I drive probs 1500 miles a week, to and from jobs all over the shire. I spend half my life sat behind some **** driving at 69mph. I'm a 85mph man. I find it safer because I'm going past all the nuggets festering at 70mph. And also because I'm not bunched up in the fantasy braking club that congregate up and down our great nations motorways. These guys, also, should be shot with the motorway rocket launchers. However, pushing in is my forte. There is absolutely no need to sit in the inside lane and que when there's a perfectly good outside lane I can push in, sneak past and carry on. And if the police ever stop me for it and fine me ill give them some proper ear ache. Hippocracy at its best! Petty? Do you actually have a driving license? That must be the dumbest question all day! Congratulations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nic Posted August 18, 2013 Report Share Posted August 18, 2013 None of the offences are new... they were all covered by section 3 of the road traffic act....driving without due care/inconsiderate driving however that was summons and go to court. now they are specified, can be dealt with by fixed penalty you pays your money take your choice, you know how to drive, you passed a test to prove it, so don't whinge if you choose not to and get fined. and before anyone thinks I'm holier than thou, Driving was a past time, hobby and profession. Over the last 35 years I have had numerous fines / points, been on both sides of the courtroom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
labstaff Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 Stick to the law and drive sensibly and considerately and there will be no problems. Also, I can't understand people moaning about speed cameras, we all know its an offence and yet they moan when caught! Again, don't speed......no problem! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazzab Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Man alive another lets bash the police generating money bla bla. For **** sake people that jump on that band wagon make me sick. If your house was broken into or ya wife beaten up you would expect them to move heaven and earth to help you. IDIOTS. That list is bang in you drive like a **** you deserve what you get FACT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanj Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Man alive another lets bash the police generating money bla bla. For **** sake people that jump on that band wagon make me sick. If your house was broken into or ya wife beaten up you would expect them to move heaven and earth to help you. IDIOTS. That list is bang in you drive like a **** you deserve what you get FACT. Totally agree, list is bang on but it requires effort and resource. I DETEST the cash generating antics of the police and am not an idiot thank you. If they concentrated more on DETERRING crime rather than using speed guns, setting up cameras inappropriately the public would be more "onside" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead-Eyed Duck Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Totally agree, list is bang on but it requires effort and resource. I DETEST the cash generating antics of the police and am not an idiot thank you. If they concentrated more on DETERRING crime rather than using speed guns, setting up cameras inappropriately the public would be more "onside" You have obviously never heard of the credit crunch and the state of the economy. Due to the mess that this countries finances is in, the number of police is going to go down (ditto the armed forces/ nurses/etc., etc., etc). So, additional resources - forget it, as it ain't going to happen. If you get nicked by an 'inappropriate' camera you only have yourself to blame - stick to the speed limit and you won't get nicked. Simples. Deterring crime - if you have any low cost examples then I am sure that the police and many others will be very pleased to listen and learn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazooka Joe Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 How ever, it should become the law that you can knock cyclists off their bikes if they insist on not using the cycle lane provide by my road tax and think just because they own a road bike, that means they then have the right to ride in the middle of the road .. That list in the OP's post is 10yr to late IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanj Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 You have obviously never heard of the credit crunch and the state of the economy. Due to the mess that this countries finances is in, the number of police is going to go down (ditto the armed forces/ nurses/etc., etc., etc). So, additional resources - forget it, as it ain't going to happen. If you get nicked by an 'inappropriate' camera you only have yourself to blame - stick to the speed limit and you won't get nicked. Simples. Deterring crime - if you have any low cost examples then I am sure that the police and many others will be very pleased to listen and learn. You missed my point entirely. I am not against cameras for actual road safety but am against them as a means of generating cash, if you are happy to accept this and other means of stealth tax then good on you, you are obviously too wealthy I particularly like your line on sticking to the speed limit. I am sure you have never exceeded a speed limit in your life Deterring crime - this wasnt as much of a pop as it sounds but should be what the Police are about (as well as solving crime after the event) and not cash generators ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpkiller Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 I have never in my life seen a camera near a school or obvious crash spot but have seen plenty hidden around blind bends / speed limit sign hidden in bushes / sited at "temporary" speed limited areas with no speed signs. Mr plonker who is the menace on the road just slows down for that couple of feet then goes tearing off again and there are no more police anymore actually watching for dangerous driving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead-Eyed Duck Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 For God's sake - those who whinge about speed cameras, please man up! I have exceeded the speed limit and been done for speeding - my fault entirely, and I accept that. If you want to pontificate about the idiots who slow down and then speed up afterwards then get a life - these losers will get their comeuppance eventually - and no doubt whinge about sneaky cameras, and cops who should be chasing the 'real' villains afterwards. I repeat what I said earlier - if you want to piously debate the speeding issue in your armchair, then go with some poor plod who has to visit some unsuspecting family who will get the news that will ruin their lives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
labstaff Posted August 25, 2013 Report Share Posted August 25, 2013 For God's sake - those who whinge about speed cameras, please man up! I have exceeded the speed limit and been done for speeding - my fault entirely, and I accept that. If you want to pontificate about the idiots who slow down and then speed up afterwards then get a life - these losers will get their comeuppance eventually - and no doubt whinge about sneaky cameras, and cops who should be chasing the 'real' villains afterwards. I repeat what I said earlier - if you want to piously debate the speeding issue in your armchair, then go with some poor plod who has to visit some unsuspecting family who will get the news that will ruin their lives. Well said! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpkiller Posted August 26, 2013 Report Share Posted August 26, 2013 If they were watching what people are doing on the roads and not measuring someones speed randomly for 20ft or whatever it is they would be giving less bad news to people wouldn't they? they dont get their comeuppance until they kill someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.