TIGHTCHOKE Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 I think you will find that the LRO orbiter that was sent up to photograph the moon from a height of about 50 miles did locate and take photos of the landing sites and the equipment left behind, oh and yes it was conducted by NASA, but the camera's control and image interpretation was conducted by an independent group of universities, I suppose they were all in on the cover up as well then, strange we feel able believe in god and his magic wand casting of plague and pestilence, yet we have men that have stood on the moon and assume them the greatest cover up artists since Mary Whitehouse. KW Is that the ROYAL WE you are using there KW? Personally I do believe that man has walked upon the moon, BUT I do not give any credence to the god story! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 You may well feel able to believe in god but that isn't a universal belief either, all down to what we individually believe as fact isn't it? That covers a wide range of things, as far as god is concerned there are people all over the world with steadfast beliefs that their particular interpretation is the only true one but not a single person can offer a grain of proof. eh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlosdesilva Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 I thought Stanley Kubrick said he faked the moon landings?Now that was a man that loved a conspiracy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin lad Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Yep............ In Glasgow nonsense according to agent K he went home colin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris B123 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Kdubya, Although I believe they did land on the moon, I have just looked at the LRO photos you mentioned.They are not very clear, it could be anything they are claiming to be lunar craft and other debris. I would have thought that this day and age they could have got photos which would prove it once and for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old rooster Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Kdubya, Although I believe they did land on the moon, I have just looked at the LRO photos you mentioned.They are not very clear, it could be anything they are claiming to be lunar craft and other debris. I would have thought that this day and age they could have got photos which would prove it once and for all. Unless those same high res photographs would cast yet more doubt? One needs to have an open mind to all things, if the existence of a god can be proven beyond doubt that would be reassuring. The scary bit would be understanding, assuming that said entity was all controlling, why such awful things happen. Digressing from the original post perhaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlosdesilva Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Yeah why havent they got decent photos?Why didnt they put something better than a mirror up there?A big ole flashing beacon that we all could see? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old rooster Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 eh! Not perhaps one of your most erudite responses, care to elaborate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisjpainter Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 the trouble is some people just can't be convinced. I could stand in a field and say i can hear horses, i can see hoof prints, and in the corner i'm sure I can see a horse standing there. No matter how hard I try, if my friend thinks it's from a herd of zebra, there's not much i can do about it! Maybe i faked the prints, maybe there's a zoo nearby, maybe i got hold of a zebra and painted it normal horse coloured etc... some people just won't be convinced, no matter how hard you slap 'em. you can't beat the fervour of a nutter! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Hate to be picky here but according to the Sunday Sport some years ago, Elvis was seen driving a London bus on the moon.. thats rubbish as well....those old leyland buses ran an in-line twin cylinderhead leyland 601 E enjine...and with the fuel consumption it could never have got as far as the moon cause it couldnt carry enough deseil..........so the sunday sport was talking a load of tosh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debaser Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 A few answers here : http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/geekquinox/celebrate-moon-landing-10-debunked-moon-hoax-arguments-211040304.html Of course the whole point of a conspiracy is that even when you can prove that it's not one, people will state the evidence is fake and part of the conspiracy. There's far far much more evidence to prove there were moon landings than not. ATB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overandunder2012 Posted December 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 (edited) the mirrors could have got there in an un maned craft, 1 to be considered, this is one of the few conspiracy's that may get proved one way or the other 1 day Edited December 2, 2013 by overandunder2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chancer2 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 I think they should have landed near that double decker bus. We all know that's real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rimotu66 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Personally I do believe that man has walked upon the moon, BUT I do not give any credence to the god story! + 1 or any other religion for that matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul65 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 My thought on this subject is that they came back from the Moon with some underwhelming photos and tampered with some of them to tart them up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul65 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Personally I do believe that man has walked upon the moon, BUT I do not give any credence to the god story! + 1 or any other religion for that matter. Here we go. Where's my popcorn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeh Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerCat Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 I like an open enquisitive mind but there are a few things that can't be disproved... 1. There are satellite images of the lunar debris from the landings. 2. Great big rockets took off and broadcast images from the surface of the moon. 3. People died doing it. 4. The so called fake images are just touched up (colour blasted to show the US flag) understandable considering the political climate at the time. 5. The Russians would have had something to say about it if there was any shred of proof in the US not landing on the moon. 6 there are mirrors placed on the moon by the yanks that are in use today. 7. A far bit of moon rock has been brought back for examination. 8. It didn't post itself did it? 9. The flag fluttering is an unexplained phenomenon that was replicated by the Russians when they tried to place huge inflatable mirrors in space to provide more light for far flung polar reaches of their country, various hypothesis exist but none are sure on the cause of the gases actions or if the gas was the cause. 10. The moon is the most dangerous environment known to man and cost silly money to get there at considerable risk to life with no benifit at the moment, hence we don't live there. 11. Mars is a good 18 months of fly time with no return, hence we have not been, just to go and fly back without stopping is 36 months for what benifit. An unmanned mission will accomplish the job for less cost as it only goes one way. 12. Having had personal experience of absolute proof of something happening (DNA, finger prints and video of the act) some people will just not believe it. 13. If people have enough time to worry about the lunar landings they could donate it to charity and do something worthwhile as they clearly have to much of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisjh Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 the bit that hurts my head is i recall the moon landings, i also recall in 1969 we had a Black & White TV, a valve wireless (radio in new money) a Ford Anglia Delux which boasted amongst its extras a cigarette lighter, etc etc yet we landed on the moon, well when i say we it was actually a small group of Nazis scientists who escaped the Nuremberg trials and were shipped off to the US after WW2 anyway did we go to the moon my money is on yes just to many people involved to cover that up, Bill Clinton US president couldn't even keep a sneaky BJ quite in the oval office what chance sending a 20 story rocket 500 thousand miles half a dozen times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerCat Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 To be fair the Saturn rockets were just multi stage v2's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 From official transcript just released from the 50 year rule " SQURK..... err houston we have a go " " errr roger that " " 5-4-3-2-1-.......broooom broooommmm brooooom roarrrrr " " we have lift off " " SQUARK......AHHHH ****.......neil, buzz....did you put the film in the camera ? " " ahhh negative that " " aahhh nuts ,,we'll have to do something when we get back.." " errroger that ...wait out " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 A few years ago one of the shuttles was delayed twice because of a crack in the windscreen and the world was getting impatient about it lifting off.....as i was walking through the canteen on site at work there were a couple of good ole norfolk boys in the corner reading the sun was heard to comment to the other " dunt alwus know wot allus this fuss about a craked winderscreen is about....if it wus a british space rocket theyd ave ole charlie up ona ladder with a bin bag an sum gaffer tape ...an orf it it wud go bor " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HW682 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 I like an open enquisitive mind but there are a few things that can't be disproved... 1. There are satellite images of the lunar debris from the landings. 2. Great big rockets took off and broadcast images from the surface of the moon. 3. People died doing it. 4. The so called fake images are just touched up (colour blasted to show the US flag) understandable considering the political climate at the time. 5. The Russians would have had something to say about it if there was any shred of proof in the US not landing on the moon. 6 there are mirrors placed on the moon by the yanks that are in use today. 7. A far bit of moon rock has been brought back for examination. 8. It didn't post itself did it? 9. The flag fluttering is an unexplained phenomenon that was replicated by the Russians when they tried to place huge inflatable mirrors in space to provide more light for far flung polar reaches of their country, various hypothesis exist but none are sure on the cause of the gases actions or if the gas was the cause. 10. The moon is the most dangerous environment known to man and cost silly money to get there at considerable risk to life with no benifit at the moment, hence we don't live there. 11. Mars is a good 18 months of fly time with no return, hence we have not been, just to go and fly back without stopping is 36 months for what benifit. An unmanned mission will accomplish the job for less cost as it only goes one way. 12. Having had personal experience of absolute proof of something happening (DNA, finger prints and video of the act) some people will just not believe it. 13. If people have enough time to worry about the lunar landings they could donate it to charity and do something worthwhile as they clearly have to much of it. I think this is key. The whole space race was the height of cold war politics and to the best of my knowledge there has never been a hint of a suggestion from the Russians that they thought the landings were fake? That and as said several times it would be very difficult to keep everyone involved quiet all this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aris Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 why don't they take satellite photos of all the equipment that was left on the surface. And if they have, like some people suggest, why don't they publish them. http://www.space.com/12796-photos-apollo-moon-landing-sites-lro.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squash wavy Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 At first I did think it was a conspiracy but there is lots of third party evidence to say otherwise now. Some good photos here http://gizmodo.com/5837658/new-detailed-images-show-lunar-landing-sites-at-higher-resolution/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.