Jump to content

Doctors letter, why they won't respond to my local firearms unit


dnic
 Share

Recommended Posts

I applied for my Shotgun licence grant two weeks ago. I went into to my local firearms licensing unit and hand delivered the application. They where happy to look at my form to make sure it was completed correctly and all the attachments where in order.

 

Today I received by post a letter from my registered doctors surgery!

 

Dear xxx

 

Further to your recent application for a firearms licence we have been asked by the firearms unit to provide medical information to support your application.

 

I regret to inform you that due to the information required and under section 12 of the Mental Health Act 1983 we are not qualified to respond.

 

If you should have have any further questions please contact your firearms licensing unit.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

xxxxxx

 

Administration

 

 

 

I have left a message with the with the firearms licensing unit, regarding the above. Appreciate if anybody has come across this before.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

Scully,

 

Good point, fortunately, I do not or ever had a mental health disorder.

 

Fair enough. It was just a thought. Given the most recent response from your licensing authority I'd simply forget about your GP's response, as, as others have said, after 21 days licensing will just assume there are no issues and issue your tickets.

It would increasingly appear that GP's have been advised by the BMA not to co-operate with the procedure as agreed regarding their role in the licensing of firearms. Back to square one it would seem!

I await my GP's letter with interest as I am currently awaiting a coterminous renewal. I would normally have declared an issue but as the new forms state 'Do you suffer from such and such' instead of 'Do you currently, or have you ever suffered......' or something along those lines, I didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole doctor thing is going tits up now they've decided they don't want to play without being paid.

+1 I could never see it working in the informal way it is currently operating. Money was always going to be a big issue, I can recall that many years ago when the application required a signature of an upstanding member of the community that knew you for several years eg doctor, solicitor, etc I went to my doctors and for two signatures in two minutes his fee was more than the application fee for the certificate.

 

Never did that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the reference to the Mental Health ACT 1983 by the GP is in response to the question on the application grant form F201 notes 4-5 medical information.

They are General Practitioners, mental health issues probably are not there area of specialism, so its easy for them to not comment, and pass the buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the reference to the Mental Health ACT 1983 by the GP is in response to the question on the application grant form F201 notes 4-5 medical information.

They are General Practitioners, mental health issues probably are not there area of specialism, so its easy for them to not comment, and pass the buck.

 

I think as others have said, it's more a question of money as it was made abundantly clear from the outset of negotiations that GP's would never, and could never, be held accountable for the actions of an applicant.

They can only comment or form an opinion on their patient from what is contained within the applicants medical history, and even with the relevant qualifications could only be expected to comment on that patients mental state in the past or the present time, but never in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sound,s like their response to BASC saying don,t pay the letter fee they,ve started to demand for renewals .As you say if they put ,they,re not qualified to comment then there,s no comeback on them if some one goes doolally after receiving Sgc Or Fac.Its a measured response to them agreeing no fees as a body then individual pratice,s saying wait a minute there,s money to be made here.Still don,t get how the B.M.A agree a policy but their member,s say and do the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it not all doctors are members of the B.M.A.

 

The process is in one big mess with grants and renewals in some parts of the country taking months or even a year plus, if it was a business it would have gone bust by now.

 

Again I can remember the good old days when a variation took a week or two and why should they not? Especially a one for one variation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a money making exercise by the gp. It won't be long until we have to have a medical report when we apply/renew and the gp's will only be too happy to make a qualified statement then, especially with the £250 consultation fee attached.

The current arrangement doesn't ask the gp for a medical assessment but rather a few tick boxes and a marker however they deem this an assessment and want the cash.

I've heard se gp surgery's have posters saying they will not complete the paperwork for a licence for whatever reason.

Whats basc's stance on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole doctor thing is going tits up now they've decided they don't want to play without being paid.

I disagree, dr's don't want the onus of deciding if someone is suitable to possess firearms with someone they've met in a handful of times for ten minutes at a time.

 

Would you?

 

My wife, although not a GP but a doctor, is totally against this.

 

This is for the police to do, with credible referrers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a money making exercise by the gp. It won't be long until we have to have a medical report when we apply/renew and the gp's will only be too happy to make a qualified statement then, especially with the £250 consultation fee attached.

The current arrangement doesn't ask the gp for a medical assessment but rather a few tick boxes and a marker however they deem this an assessment and want the cash.

I've heard se gp surgery's have posters saying they will not complete the paperwork for a licence for whatever reason.

Whats basc's stance on this?

That's it, blame the doctors rather than the police now they've shifted responsibility.

 

Of course most Doctors spend their time concocting ways of raping money out of non medical issues rather than treating patients.......

Edited by kyska
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, dr's don't want the onus of deciding if someone is suitable to possess firearms with someone they've met in a handful of times for ten minutes at a time.

 

Would you?

 

My wife, although not a GP but a doctor, is totally against this.

 

This is for the police to do, with credible referrers.

 

Doctors want paying, that is the only issue. Everything else is about making their excuses to not comply without sounding greedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...