Mice! Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 I doubt they would Gordon, some looser probably only benefits, here's an idea you break the law you loose anything the government is paying you. I read Tuesdays times and think it was Wednesday sun, the times said that the sab group had received donations and membership enquires seemed to be written from the sabs point of view, the sun was just a side piece with a picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silver pigeon69 Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 If you found out where the sab lived, got 10 people in masks to stand outside his house and tell him and his familly, everytime they come and go, what they thought of him, im sure there would be a lot less of them. IMO they are cowards who hide behind the masks and every incident seems to involve a mob of them harrasing women or lone individuals. As soon as you see someone standing up to them they run a mile and start crying on social media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpredder Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 The only person seen trying to harm an animal in this video was the saboteur, deliberately frightening a horse, snatching at the reins and probably causing physical pain as the bit was jerked in its mouth. Once the reins had been grabbed, the rider had few options. She could not defuse the situation by moving away, because the saboteur had obtained control of the horse. The rider could only reasonably assume that her attacker was either attempting to steal the horse or else to terrify it and engineer a situation in which she or the horse was likely to be injured. The saboteur had the option of releasing the reins and moving away at any time, but continued to torment the animal for as long as he was able (about twenty seconds, as far as I could judge from the video), until some pedestrians came to the aid of the rider. The rider only struck her assailant in order to regain possession and control of her animal, and ceased to strike him immediately the horse was released. By releasing the video, the South Coast Hunt Saboteurs have shown the world how little they care about the welfare of animals. To any shooters who consider the rider over-reacted, I pose this question: What would you do if a stranger grabbed your dog, refused to release it, and spent the next twenty seconds jerking its collar and causing very obvious distress to the animal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yod dropper Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 Remember Dale Farm? One lady (whose partner thought it was okay to assault Rupert Murdoch) who was wearing a mask and occupied the scaffold defences got £several thousand compensation from the police. She climbed the scaffolding 'because she was frightened of the police' and wore a mask 'because she was cold'. We all know this is absolute nonsense and just plain wrong, pretty much as with this case. But you could pontificate on that as much as much has been done within this thread. You can't wonder they feel emboldened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silver pigeon69 Posted November 26, 2017 Report Share Posted November 26, 2017 (edited) 18 minutes ago, yod dropper said: Remember Dale Farm? One lady (whose partner thought it was okay to assault Rupert Murdoch) who was wearing a mask and occupied the scaffold defences got £several thousand compensation from the police. She climbed the scaffolding 'because she was frightened of the police' and wore a mask 'because she was cold'. We all know this is absolute nonsense and just plain wrong, pretty much as with this case. But you could pontificate on that as much as much has been done within this thread. You can't wonder they feel emboldened. On the flipside, anyone remember the balaclava wearing person that was trespassing, got killed by the "scared" owner and the owner got off?? Kenneth Noye(spelling??) Edit: person = policeman that was on surveilance! Edited November 26, 2017 by silver pigeon69 adding info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panoma1 Posted November 27, 2017 Report Share Posted November 27, 2017 Is not the real point to be made, that if the masked idiots were not there in the first place, this incident would not have happened? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie to this Posted November 27, 2017 Report Share Posted November 27, 2017 55 minutes ago, panoma1 said: Is not the real point to be made, that if the masked idiots were not there in the first place, this incident would not have happened? Exactly that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted November 27, 2017 Report Share Posted November 27, 2017 Quote If you found out where the sab lived, got 10 people in masks to stand outside his house and tell him and his familly, everytime they come and go, what they thought of him, im sure there would be a lot less of them. IMO they are cowards who hide behind the masks and every incident seems to involve a mob of them harrasing women or lone individuals. As soon as you see someone standing up to them they run a mile and start crying on social media. Totally agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mice! Posted November 27, 2017 Report Share Posted November 27, 2017 Looking at this from a different angle, I drove home this morning past the fracking site at Blackpool, here there is a constant demonstration going on, so there were already people there at 740am on a cold wet morning, none were wearing masks, they have disrupted traffic on a few occasions but no one has felt the need to defend themselves, that I know of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.