Jump to content

40,000 police on standby..Paris france


ditchman
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Gordon R said:

That is the crux of the matter. We will have to wait for the Policeman's explanation.

If there were genuine grounds for suspecting that, I would have to revise my opinion. If there were not, then it is not right that someone is dead.

👍

10 hours ago, Lloyd90 said:

I was in disbelief when the 2 Police unions issued statements blatantly referring to the people (it appear aimed at ethnic minorities) as vermin and saying they were at war! 

👍

8 hours ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

Hope it doesn't come here!

👍

Its reminiscent of the pointless riots we have had here in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

12 hours ago, oowee said:

👍

👍

👍

Its reminiscent of the pointless riots we have had here in the past.

Pointless.........maybe  !  BUT, it created an area where Police had to have specific permission prior to entering  ??

I recall similar copy cat riots in Manchester, but their Chief told his troops to "get in there and sort it " they did  ! Very few arrests, but the riots didn't last a week  !

Edited by Westley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rem260 said:

Where was the civil unrest when Andrew Harper was dragged to his death and the offenders only charged with manslaughter.

Indeed, but the circumstances were very different;

  1. The victim was a member of the 'authorities'
  2. The perpetrators were members of a 'minority group'
  3. The (very many of us) who were both shocked, outraged and hugely sympathetic to the victims family are 'law abiding citizens' - and I'm also sure the family would not have wanted riots.

No point in going into more detail, but it was a horrific case and I don't think proper justice was done - but I wouldn't have rioted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

Indeed, but the circumstances were very different;

  1. The victim was a member of the 'authorities'
  2. The perpetrators were members of a 'minority group'
  3. The (very many of us) who were both shocked, outraged and hugely sympathetic to the victims family are 'law abiding citizens' - and I'm also sure the family would not have wanted riots.

No point in going into more detail, but it was a horrific case and I don't think proper justice was done - but I wouldn't have rioted.

Me neither and I wouldn't have condoned others rioting either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in this country UK....the Riot Act was introduced in 1715...and remained in force in its entirity until 1967....after which it was repealed and watered down.....correct me if im wrong but the Act was read to the protesting miners before the baton charge...............and then since then i believe Tony Blair put the nail in the coffin of the act

do you think it prudent to re-awaken the act...for future use before **** happens ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yellow Bear said:

Most of the issues we are facing at the moment come back to said war  criminal's period in power.

Hah ....true with help of his letter box mouth wife.......and his scumbag advisors....thinking of ways to catch votes so they can continue to empty the trough and do insider deals...........

i feel vitriolic profanity welling up in my throat ...so i will stop...............................................................i would like to add that i had a wonderful dream the other night where i witnessed Tony Blair and his mates impaled on wooden stakes up the jacksie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 30/06/2023 at 20:54, Dave-G said:

He was spoken to by two cops at the window, at least one clearly showing his aimed gun - might be fair to assume he had been uncooperative or evasive before driving away, as can be expected from a potential terrorist needing to be stopped. It looked to me like the car started to pull away before the shot was fired and a moving target makes it harder for accurate shot placement when suddenly being nudged as the car took off. The subject may have panicked into a strewth situation but the cop had to make a spontaneous decision based on what he's seen or suspects is occuring.

Driving away from a traffic stop does not make you a terrorist suspect, and if the officer got it wrong he should pay the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ordnance said:

Driving away from a traffic stop does not make you a terrorist suspect, and if the officer got it wrong he should pay the price.

As always, it depends on the circumstances which none of us have in full. We'll need to wait for the results of the investigation before claiming who was at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, 12gauge82 said:

As always, it depends on the circumstances which none of us have in full. We'll need to wait for the results of the investigation before claiming who was at fault.

what i have heard ...(dont know wether it is true or not)............is in France....if a driver drives away from a police stop order.....and drives away without being released....the police are automatically allowed to shoot without fear of being prosicuted....

this "happening" is definatly not a first and has happened many times before i understand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ditchman said:

what i have heard ...(dont know wether it is true or not)............is in France....if a driver drives away from a police stop order.....and drives away without being released....the police are automatically allowed to shoot without fear of being prosicuted....

this "happening" is definatly not a first and has happened many times before i understand

That is what I have heard, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ditchman said:

what i have heard ...(dont know wether it is true or not)............is in France....if a driver drives away from a police stop order.....and drives away without being released....the police are automatically allowed to shoot without fear of being prosicuted....

this "happening" is definatly not a first and has happened many times before i understand

I wasn't aware of that, thanks 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

what i have heard ...(dont know wether it is true or not)............is in France....if a driver drives away from a police stop order.....and drives away without being released....the police are automatically allowed to shoot without fear of being prosicuted....

this "happening" is definatly not a first and has happened many times before i understand

 

Its not that straight forward.

 

Quote

By law French police are allowed to shoot. That includes when the driver or occupants of a vehicle ignore an order to stop ( and are deemed to pose a risk to the officer's life or physical safety, or other people's. ) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...