Jump to content

Mr Bates v The Post Office


armsid
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

2 hours ago, JohnfromUK said:

........ and if not - where were the auditors?

That, indeed is another fundamental question. Ernst and Young may be feeling the pressure.

However, the problem would be that, if it were normal practice under the manual system for all imbalances to be "suspensed" until accounted for by the SPM, and any repayments suspensed too, the only element likely to raise an auditor's eyebrow would be the increased volume of transactions following the introduction of Horizon.

The major question should be, what were the civil servants doing who supervised the spec of Horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be many questions in reality. Another one from me is,,,, are everyone that had knowledge, or even a thought/doubt that there was an issue and didn't put their hand up and say, "excuse me, but......" , going to be pulled up and questioned ? IMO, ALL that had knowledge should be 'reprimanded' !!!

It can't just have been the Postmasters/mistresses that [obviously] knew of the problems. To me it seems lots of 'insiders' wore blinkers,,,, or were instructed to 'cop a deaf'un' ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i posted earlier i will be surprised if any of the Post Office hierarchy or the Horizon lawyers and experts who lied (commited perjury under oath in a crown court) will face prison (they should ALL go) be made bankrupt lose their pensions their homes their good names and suffer the same fate as the postmasters went through. This is not over yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, old man said:

Anyone see the Tax chap on the news?

Inland Revenue now involved?

I haven't seen anything else after seeing the new compensation and tax 'issues' on the news the other day. Apparently, the PO have paid the very small amount of compensation out of their pre-tax profits,,,, oh dear 🤔

The entire PO finances needs looking over,,,, by an INDEPENDENT authority !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JKD said:

I haven't seen anything else after seeing the new compensation and tax 'issues' on the news the other day. Apparently, the PO have paid the very small amount of compensation out of their pre-tax profits,,,, oh dear 🤔

The entire PO finances needs looking over,,,, by an INDEPENDENT authority !!!

Just caught the tail end and didn't really understand other than the possibility of a big tax fiddle with the possibility of a big tax liability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, old man said:

Just caught the tail end and didn't really understand other than the possibility of a big tax fiddle with the possibility of a big tax liability?

The way I [simple bloke] understand it is,,,, they've reduced the amount of tax they should pay by paying out compensation from their pre-tax profits. It's a pretty basic 'mistake' , but if true, how did anyone think they could hide that fact !?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JKD said:

The way I [simple bloke] understand it is,,,, they've reduced the amount of tax they should pay by paying out compensation from their pre-tax profits. It's a pretty basic 'mistake' , but if true, how did anyone think they could hide that fact !?

Due to the arrogance shown by all involved maybe they thought themselves immune?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, old man said:

Due to the arrogance shown by all involved maybe they thought themselves immune?

Probably !!! The holier than thou PO 😠🤬

The problem now is,,,, any investigations have to be carried out to the 'nth degree, with every T crossed and every dot dotted. This I feel is going to be very hard to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JKD said:

It's a pretty basic 'mistake' , but if true, how did anyone think they could hide that fact !?

Once again I ask - Where were the auditors?

Pretty basic mistake maybe, but that is the whole reason that you have auditors - to detect and correct 'mistakes', accidental or deliberate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

Once again I ask - Where were the auditors?

Pretty basic mistake maybe, but that is the whole reason that you have auditors - to detect and correct 'mistakes', accidental or deliberate.

Exactly,,,, ignorance is no defence ! This whole debacle stinks !!!

Edited by JKD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, armsid said:

And now Fujitsu has a 500m hole in its pension fund and recording losses How convenient when they NOT THE BRITISH TAXPAYER should be footing the bill for their product failure

Yeah, good luck with that.

We will foot the bill, and Fujitsu will carry on albeit under an different name if they fold.

And so the gravy train chugs along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...