Jump to content

Homemade gun anyone ?


Peskyfoxs
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some more sensible, calm and quality reporting by the daily mail! I love how "EXPANDING AMMUNITION!!!" is as news worthy as depleted uraniun cannon shells. And i dont think the "plastic tags" are part of the construction, look more like they are holding it on a display board. How do we have any hope when a eccentric homemade gun is treated like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite funny that! On first reading the headline I imagined a multi barrelled weapon firing 74 rounds at a time, or a weapon with a magazine capacity of 74. It turns out neither is correct, and in fact it doesn't have a magazine at all but 74 was the number of rounds found! So while it may be capable of firing 74 rounds, each one would have to be loaded and then fired before another could do likewise. So it has in fact a single shot mechanism...though no doubt this wouldn't be quite the headline grabber the Mail would prefer. No wonder I don't buy papers anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive, i have a .22lr capable of firing 500 shots of EXPANDING BULLETS, that.mushroom when they hit flesh, if i reload 500 times!

 

Oh my god why on earth would you need such a dangerous WEAPON. Next we will be hearing about bullets that can kill or even pass right through flesh :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reporting is diabolical it is so bad I'm not sure if it is intentional ...

 

What isn't clear in the article is if the shotgun was the one he owned when he lost his liscence or not, one doesn't require an SGC to use a shotgun..... But to posses (him being the landowner/occupier) his uncle is guilty of a section 5 offence for giving it to him, the cable ties hold it to the evidence box aren't part of it, it looks like it might be a modified captive bolt gun. Oh and you have to be an "expert" to fire it..... BTW the 74 rounds were LR and the "pistol" was chambered for shorts from what I gather......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of rubbish as long as the barrel on it is thick enough to withstand the blast of it being fired and for .22lr that I would think most .22 air guns barrels would do the job nicely I would have no worries about firing that gun why do they always have to make mountains out of mole hills.

 

Many airguns (esp the better ones) use .22 barrels that would go onto a rimfire no problem.... from reading the article (i use article loosely) the "pistol was chambered for .22 shorts which produce 87ft/lbs (118J) so not much more than an airgun an FAC Daystate ranger does 80ft/lbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...