Jump to content

Cutting Down .22 LR Barrel - Does It Have To Be Re Proofed ?


adarmo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ring the proofhouse! I haven't heard this either!

 

I have a friend who works there - he says it is correct - but he would, because of course he only sees the guns that have been submitted for re proofing !

No reproof required

Shortening is not going to affect the barrels pressure bearing capacity

 

I agree - if anything it might reduce it but the laws rarely follow sense IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called the gunshop and it seems I misunderstood.

 

The issue wasn't the cutting down it was re threading the barrel afterwards.

 

But I've seen a thread on here with a legal case stating that it is not required - I presume that still stands

Edited by adarmo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called the gunshop and it seems I misunderstood.

 

The issue wasn't the cutting down it was re threading the barrel afterwards.

 

I presume the same applies - gunshops think you should - everyone else thinks it ok.

There are a couple of problems here,

1 The law says that would need to be re-proofed if the barrel has been substantially weakened (i don't think screw cutting does that, 1000's have been done without a problem)

2 Even if the rifle were to be deemed out of proof because of the work done to the barrel it would only be a legal problem if you were selling it.

3 On the other hand if you where the one doing the work would you want to make sure your backside was covered by having the barrel re-proofed at the customers cost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you sold the rifle with a freshly cut/threaded barrel......who'd who when it was done ??

It should be easy as if the barrel had been re-proofed because the barrel had been threaded the muzzle should have a proof mark, but the only problem is if the barrel was screw cut before it was first proofed then it will only have the marks at chamber

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called the gunshop and it seems I misunderstood.

 

The issue wasn't the cutting down it was re threading the barrel afterwards.

 

But I've seen a thread on here with a legal case stating that it is not required - I presume that still stands

Yes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...