pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 14 hours ago, oowee said: I have a job. I am a hunter now 😋 After giving the best years of my life in public service I deserve a break. 👍 "Public service".............do elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 PROJECT FEAR again, BBC Politics Live with an article on how there will be a shortage of TOILET ROLLS after Brexit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eyefor Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 (edited) 32 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: PROJECT FEAR again, BBC Politics Live with an article on how there will be a shortage of TOILET ROLLS after Brexit! Logical thought though.....most of the current UK stocks will be needed to mop up the vast amount of BBC-dispensed Brexit carp? Edited January 14, 2019 by Eyefor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 2 hours ago, pinfireman said: "Public service".............do elaborate. Civil servant. UK investment projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 2 hours ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: PROJECT FEAR again, BBC Politics Live with an article on how there will be a shortage of TOILET ROLLS after Brexit! You will not survive Brexit with the Brexit Survival Kit (tm) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-46814527?ns_source=facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_linkname=news_central&ns_campaign=bbc_daily_politics_and_sunday_politics Reminds me of when we narrowly avoided apocalypse with the millennium bug, luckily we all bought anti millennium bug software patches...didnt we ..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 From that very article; "Lynda Mayall, 61, who lives near Wakefield, bought a kit after hearing reports of how the UK may struggle post-Brexit. "I'm not worried about Brexit, I'm worried about the aftermath," she said. "I feel that there's going to be a bit of chaos for the first six months until border controls are sorted." A VERY silly women, just the sort that PROJECT FEAR preys upon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 1 hour ago, oowee said: Civil servant. UK investment projects. Investments from within the Fourth Reich, or from free countries? 2 hours ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: PROJECT FEAR again, BBC Politics Live with an article on how there will be a shortage of TOILET ROLLS after Brexit! That,s a possibility........as the Remoaners would be crapping themselves when all their Project Fear lies are exposed! 11 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: From that very article; "Lynda Mayall, 61, who lives near Wakefield, bought a kit after hearing reports of how the UK may struggle post-Brexit. "I'm not worried about Brexit, I'm worried about the aftermath," she said. "I feel that there's going to be a bit of chaos for the first six months until border controls are sorted." A VERY silly women, just the sort that PROJECT FEAR preys upon! She,s a Labour supporter, and you know they will believe anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 (edited) Theresa May’s letter of reassurance from the EU has gone down like a lead balloon with the DUP, who have dismissed it as “meaningless” without legally binding changes and said that in fact it “bolsters our concerns” about the backstop. Nigel Dodds even hit out at May directly over comments she made about Northern Ireland’s position in the UK, calling on her to “cease from such foolish talk”. Not looking good for May’s hopes of using a DUP reversal as a catalyst to get other Brexiteers back on board… Ardent Brexiteer and Government Whip Gareth Johnson has resigned from the Government in order to vote against May’s deal. Johnson had formerly served as a PPS for both David Davis and Dominic Raab. Johnson says “the time has come to place my loyalty to my country above my loyalty to the Government”… Read his resignation letter in full here: Oliver Letwin, Nicky Morgan, and Nick Boles are among a group of ultra-Remainer Tories to propose a plan that would force the Government to recind Article 50 when May’s Deal is voted down tomorrow. This is the first time rescinding A50 has been seriously proposed as fallback… The plan goes that if no consensus is reached by Parliament as to what to do next in the six weeks that follow the meaningful vote, the Prime Minister would be compelled to ask the EU for an extension to Article 50. If they refused then the plan would force the PM to unilaterally rescind Article 50… Obviously the EU is only going to do one thing if they’re given the chance to automatically end the Brexit process. The EU would have proved escape is impossible, and the UK would be left humiliat Edited January 14, 2019 by pinfireman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, pinfireman said: Investments from within the Fourth Reich, or from free countries? Mostly Japan and US but also did a lot of work with BMW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 1 minute ago, oowee said: Mostly Japan and US but also did a lot of work with BMW. When they bought Longbridge, or when they baled out, and sold it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 Longbridge I was on the other side of the fence. Hams hall engine plant. Oxford for the mini and the ev's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 Peter Bone explains some of his misgivings with the Prime-Ministers "deal." "Peter Bone is a member of the Select Committee on Exiting the European Union, and is MP for Wellingborough. All my political life, I have been campaigning to take the United Kingdom out of the European Union superstate. Quite simply, I believe that the United Kingdom should be a sovereign nation making its own decisions. In 2011, I was behind the motion that we should have a referendum on whether Britain should remain in the European Union. This was opposed by David Cameron’s government and, winding up that debate, I suggested that MPs should put the country first and their Party second. The vote resulted in 81 Conservative MPs defying a strict three-line whip to support a referendum. In 2015, with my colleagues and Parliamentary neighbours Philip Hollobone and Tom Pursglove, I held a ballot in North Northamptonshire to find out whether local people wanted to leave the EU. This was the biggest vote on the European issue since 1975, with 100,000 ballot papers distributed across Wellingborough, Kettering, Corby and East Northamptonshire. The result was that 81.1 per cent voted to leave. In December of that year, along with Tom, I co-founded a non-party political Leave campaign – Grassroots Out. I travelled to every corner of the United Kingdom, speaking to people from all areas, ages and backgrounds. I held grassroots events in village halls and at street stalls. I addressed major rallies of thousands of people at venues in every part of our United Kingdom. I knocked on thousands of doors talking to people who were energised by this great democratic event. On the 23rd of June 2016, the people of the United Kingdom voted by a substantial majority to leave the European Union. Unfortunately, more than two years on from that great debate, the Prime Minister’s proposal does not deliver the Brexit that 17.4 million people voted for. Let us look at what people told me mattered to them. First, they wanted an end to the free movement of people from the European Union. They thought it unfair that people from the EU could come to this country and enjoy the benefits of our public services when they had no connection with the United Kingdom, yet at the same time skilled workers, such as doctors, from outside the EU, couldn’t get in. They wanted to see a fair immigration policy based on merit not where you come from. Theresa May claims that her deal ends free movement, but this is palpable nonsense. The Commons was promised an Immigration Bill more than a year ago. However, it was only last month that we got a White Paper on what might be in the Bill. If the government was planning to end free movement when we left the EU, we would have had such a Bill by now. The non-binding political declaration, which is just a wish-list, talks about ending free movement, but of course we have no detail of our future trading relationship, and it is highly likely that the Government will trade off ending free movement for a trade deal. The one thing that is certain is the Prime Minister’s plan does not guarantee the ending of free movement. Second, they wanted an end to billions and billions of pounds paid each and every year to the European Union by UK taxpayers. Last year, we gave the European Union a net £9 billion contribution. Since we have been a part of the European project we have given a net subscription fee of over £210 billion. If that money had stayed in this country, we could have improved our public services, cut taxes and lowered national debt. This cost might not have been so bad if we had had a trading surplus with the European Union, but of course this is not the case: they sell £100 billion of goods more to us then we do them each year. Under May’s plan we would pay a minimum amount of £39 billion to the EU for the transition. That equates to £60 million for each constituency in the country, just think what a difference that could make! However, the £39 billion is only the start. Her plans allow for a further extension of two years for the transition period which would cost a further £20 billion. In addition, we don’t know how much we have to contribute each year in any future trading relationship. So, it is reasonable to expect that the Prime Minister’s plan will cost in excess of £60 billion. That is hardly stopping paying billions and billions of pounds each and every year to the European Union. Third, they wanted us to make our own laws in our own country. Clearly, our citizens want to return control to Parliament. They want to elect their politicians to make laws which are in the interest of the people of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. They also want the power to be able to throw out those politicians through the ballot box. Simply, they want sovereignty returned to our country. They are fed up with laws and regulations made by European bureaucrats who are not subject to scrutiny or to election by the people. May’s plan would sign up to accepting laws made by the EU, with no say in making them. The worst part of this being that we have no unilateral right to end this arrangement, and we could become a permanent rule-taker, not rule-maker. Fourth, they wanted us to be judged by our own judges, not by a foreign court, as our judicial system is the envy of the world. Our judges are of the highest integrity and calibre, and they make their decisions based on the law of the land and never for political reasons. Yet at the moment our Supreme Court is subservient to the European Court of Justice whose judges are appointed for political reasons. They have a long record of producing dubious decisions which seem to be based more on politics than the law. What the British people want is a set of properly qualified judges, solely interpreting the law of our land and making their decisions purely based on the evidence they have put before them. That is what we have with our judicial system and that is not what we have with the ECJ. Unfortunately, the Prime Minister’s plans would have us in a transition period for up to four years, during that period we will be subject to the rulings of the European Court of Justice. What is worse, is that we will not have any say in how the laws are drawn up, and we will have no presence in the ECJ. Even after the implementation period, if the Northern Ireland backstop kicks in, we will still be subject to European rulings on vast swathes of the law and regulation that affect us. So clearly the May’s proposals do not allow for our own judges to judge our own laws. The Prime Minister’s proposal might be the worst deal ever for this country. It is certainly not the Brexit that people voted for." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
besty57 Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 And she has the gall to say this leaving,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motty Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 1 hour ago, besty57 said: And she has the gall to say this leaving,, Don't worry, Oowee will be along in a minute to tell us that it is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 1 hour ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: Peter Bone explains some of his misgivings with the Prime-Ministers "deal." "Peter Bone is a member of the Select Committee on Exiting the European Union, and is MP for Wellingborough. All my political life, I have been campaigning to take the United Kingdom out of the European Union superstate. Quite simply, I believe that the United Kingdom should be a sovereign nation making its own decisions. In 2011, I was behind the motion that we should have a referendum on whether Britain should remain in the European Union. This was opposed by David Cameron’s government and, winding up that debate, I suggested that MPs should put the country first and their Party second. The vote resulted in 81 Conservative MPs defying a strict three-line whip to support a referendum. In 2015, with my colleagues and Parliamentary neighbours Philip Hollobone and Tom Pursglove, I held a ballot in North Northamptonshire to find out whether local people wanted to leave the EU. This was the biggest vote on the European issue since 1975, with 100,000 ballot papers distributed across Wellingborough, Kettering, Corby and East Northamptonshire. The result was that 81.1 per cent voted to leave. In December of that year, along with Tom, I co-founded a non-party political Leave campaign – Grassroots Out. I travelled to every corner of the United Kingdom, speaking to people from all areas, ages and backgrounds. I held grassroots events in village halls and at street stalls. I addressed major rallies of thousands of people at venues in every part of our United Kingdom. I knocked on thousands of doors talking to people who were energised by this great democratic event. On the 23rd of June 2016, the people of the United Kingdom voted by a substantial majority to leave the European Union. Unfortunately, more than two years on from that great debate, the Prime Minister’s proposal does not deliver the Brexit that 17.4 million people voted for. Let us look at what people told me mattered to them. First, they wanted an end to the free movement of people from the European Union. They thought it unfair that people from the EU could come to this country and enjoy the benefits of our public services when they had no connection with the United Kingdom, yet at the same time skilled workers, such as doctors, from outside the EU, couldn’t get in. They wanted to see a fair immigration policy based on merit not where you come from. Theresa May claims that her deal ends free movement, but this is palpable nonsense. The Commons was promised an Immigration Bill more than a year ago. However, it was only last month that we got a White Paper on what might be in the Bill. If the government was planning to end free movement when we left the EU, we would have had such a Bill by now. The non-binding political declaration, which is just a wish-list, talks about ending free movement, but of course we have no detail of our future trading relationship, and it is highly likely that the Government will trade off ending free movement for a trade deal. The one thing that is certain is the Prime Minister’s plan does not guarantee the ending of free movement. Second, they wanted an end to billions and billions of pounds paid each and every year to the European Union by UK taxpayers. Last year, we gave the European Union a net £9 billion contribution. Since we have been a part of the European project we have given a net subscription fee of over £210 billion. If that money had stayed in this country, we could have improved our public services, cut taxes and lowered national debt. This cost might not have been so bad if we had had a trading surplus with the European Union, but of course this is not the case: they sell £100 billion of goods more to us then we do them each year. Under May’s plan we would pay a minimum amount of £39 billion to the EU for the transition. That equates to £60 million for each constituency in the country, just think what a difference that could make! However, the £39 billion is only the start. Her plans allow for a further extension of two years for the transition period which would cost a further £20 billion. In addition, we don’t know how much we have to contribute each year in any future trading relationship. So, it is reasonable to expect that the Prime Minister’s plan will cost in excess of £60 billion. That is hardly stopping paying billions and billions of pounds each and every year to the European Union. Third, they wanted us to make our own laws in our own country. Clearly, our citizens want to return control to Parliament. They want to elect their politicians to make laws which are in the interest of the people of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. They also want the power to be able to throw out those politicians through the ballot box. Simply, they want sovereignty returned to our country. They are fed up with laws and regulations made by European bureaucrats who are not subject to scrutiny or to election by the people. May’s plan would sign up to accepting laws made by the EU, with no say in making them. The worst part of this being that we have no unilateral right to end this arrangement, and we could become a permanent rule-taker, not rule-maker. Fourth, they wanted us to be judged by our own judges, not by a foreign court, as our judicial system is the envy of the world. Our judges are of the highest integrity and calibre, and they make their decisions based on the law of the land and never for political reasons. Yet at the moment our Supreme Court is subservient to the European Court of Justice whose judges are appointed for political reasons. They have a long record of producing dubious decisions which seem to be based more on politics than the law. What the British people want is a set of properly qualified judges, solely interpreting the law of our land and making their decisions purely based on the evidence they have put before them. That is what we have with our judicial system and that is not what we have with the ECJ. Unfortunately, the Prime Minister’s plans would have us in a transition period for up to four years, during that period we will be subject to the rulings of the European Court of Justice. What is worse, is that we will not have any say in how the laws are drawn up, and we will have no presence in the ECJ. Even after the implementation period, if the Northern Ireland backstop kicks in, we will still be subject to European rulings on vast swathes of the law and regulation that affect us. So clearly the May’s proposals do not allow for our own judges to judge our own laws. The Prime Minister’s proposal might be the worst deal ever for this country. It is certainly not the Brexit that people voted for." Peter Bone for PM ! He gets my vote! Following Guido’s article about fears of a German economic recession last week, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is now “tracking a recession” in Germany. Recognising the gravity of the situation, they explicitly say: “Are we overreacting? We don’t think so.” Their German GDP tracker has deteriorated to -0.1% quarter-on-quarter, mean that Germany is heading towards the two consecutive quarters of negative growth defined as a technical recession. BAML point to extremely weak factory orders as well as the gilet jaunes disruptions in France for the continued downturn. Britain on the other hand is the fastest growing European country in the G7… 1 minute ago, pinfireman said: Peter Bone for PM ! He gets my vote! Following Guido’s article about fears of a German economic recession last week, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is now “tracking a recession” in Germany. Recognising the gravity of the situation, they explicitly say: “Are we overreacting? We don’t think so.” Their German GDP tracker has deteriorated to -0.1% quarter-on-quarter, mean that Germany is heading towards the two consecutive quarters of negative growth defined as a technical recession. BAML point to extremely weak factory orders as well as the gilet jaunes disruptions in France for the continued downturn. Britain on the other hand is the fastest growing European country in the G7… I have no doubt owee will be along to dispute this.......... He,s probably consulting George Soros now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 Occasionally, even Tony Benn got it right................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-G Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, pinfireman said: Peter Bone for PM ! He gets my vote! Following Guido’s article about fears of a German economic recession last week, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is now “tracking a recession” in Germany. Recognising the gravity of the situation, they explicitly say: “Are we overreacting? We don’t think so.” Their German GDP tracker has deteriorated to -0.1% quarter-on-quarter, mean that Germany is heading towards the two consecutive quarters of negative growth defined as a technical recession. BAML point to extremely weak factory orders as well as the gilet jaunes disruptions in France for the continued downturn. Britain on the other hand is the fastest growing European country in the G7… So taking our money whilst hoping we'll be mug enough to let them sneak a snidy back stop trap gets us to give them more money, making them stronger and us weaker. Yea that makes sense - really yea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 Grantham votes 52% to 48% against Nick Boles! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12gauge82 Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 2 hours ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: Peter Bone explains some of his misgivings with the Prime-Ministers "deal." "Peter Bone is a member of the Select Committee on Exiting the European Union, and is MP for Wellingborough. All my political life, I have been campaigning to take the United Kingdom out of the European Union superstate. Quite simply, I believe that the United Kingdom should be a sovereign nation making its own decisions. In 2011, I was behind the motion that we should have a referendum on whether Britain should remain in the European Union. This was opposed by David Cameron’s government and, winding up that debate, I suggested that MPs should put the country first and their Party second. The vote resulted in 81 Conservative MPs defying a strict three-line whip to support a referendum. In 2015, with my colleagues and Parliamentary neighbours Philip Hollobone and Tom Pursglove, I held a ballot in North Northamptonshire to find out whether local people wanted to leave the EU. This was the biggest vote on the European issue since 1975, with 100,000 ballot papers distributed across Wellingborough, Kettering, Corby and East Northamptonshire. The result was that 81.1 per cent voted to leave. In December of that year, along with Tom, I co-founded a non-party political Leave campaign – Grassroots Out. I travelled to every corner of the United Kingdom, speaking to people from all areas, ages and backgrounds. I held grassroots events in village halls and at street stalls. I addressed major rallies of thousands of people at venues in every part of our United Kingdom. I knocked on thousands of doors talking to people who were energised by this great democratic event. On the 23rd of June 2016, the people of the United Kingdom voted by a substantial majority to leave the European Union. Unfortunately, more than two years on from that great debate, the Prime Minister’s proposal does not deliver the Brexit that 17.4 million people voted for. Let us look at what people told me mattered to them. First, they wanted an end to the free movement of people from the European Union. They thought it unfair that people from the EU could come to this country and enjoy the benefits of our public services when they had no connection with the United Kingdom, yet at the same time skilled workers, such as doctors, from outside the EU, couldn’t get in. They wanted to see a fair immigration policy based on merit not where you come from. Theresa May claims that her deal ends free movement, but this is palpable nonsense. The Commons was promised an Immigration Bill more than a year ago. However, it was only last month that we got a White Paper on what might be in the Bill. If the government was planning to end free movement when we left the EU, we would have had such a Bill by now. The non-binding political declaration, which is just a wish-list, talks about ending free movement, but of course we have no detail of our future trading relationship, and it is highly likely that the Government will trade off ending free movement for a trade deal. The one thing that is certain is the Prime Minister’s plan does not guarantee the ending of free movement. Second, they wanted an end to billions and billions of pounds paid each and every year to the European Union by UK taxpayers. Last year, we gave the European Union a net £9 billion contribution. Since we have been a part of the European project we have given a net subscription fee of over £210 billion. If that money had stayed in this country, we could have improved our public services, cut taxes and lowered national debt. This cost might not have been so bad if we had had a trading surplus with the European Union, but of course this is not the case: they sell £100 billion of goods more to us then we do them each year. Under May’s plan we would pay a minimum amount of £39 billion to the EU for the transition. That equates to £60 million for each constituency in the country, just think what a difference that could make! However, the £39 billion is only the start. Her plans allow for a further extension of two years for the transition period which would cost a further £20 billion. In addition, we don’t know how much we have to contribute each year in any future trading relationship. So, it is reasonable to expect that the Prime Minister’s plan will cost in excess of £60 billion. That is hardly stopping paying billions and billions of pounds each and every year to the European Union. Third, they wanted us to make our own laws in our own country. Clearly, our citizens want to return control to Parliament. They want to elect their politicians to make laws which are in the interest of the people of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. They also want the power to be able to throw out those politicians through the ballot box. Simply, they want sovereignty returned to our country. They are fed up with laws and regulations made by European bureaucrats who are not subject to scrutiny or to election by the people. May’s plan would sign up to accepting laws made by the EU, with no say in making them. The worst part of this being that we have no unilateral right to end this arrangement, and we could become a permanent rule-taker, not rule-maker. Fourth, they wanted us to be judged by our own judges, not by a foreign court, as our judicial system is the envy of the world. Our judges are of the highest integrity and calibre, and they make their decisions based on the law of the land and never for political reasons. Yet at the moment our Supreme Court is subservient to the European Court of Justice whose judges are appointed for political reasons. They have a long record of producing dubious decisions which seem to be based more on politics than the law. What the British people want is a set of properly qualified judges, solely interpreting the law of our land and making their decisions purely based on the evidence they have put before them. That is what we have with our judicial system and that is not what we have with the ECJ. Unfortunately, the Prime Minister’s plans would have us in a transition period for up to four years, during that period we will be subject to the rulings of the European Court of Justice. What is worse, is that we will not have any say in how the laws are drawn up, and we will have no presence in the ECJ. Even after the implementation period, if the Northern Ireland backstop kicks in, we will still be subject to European rulings on vast swathes of the law and regulation that affect us. So clearly the May’s proposals do not allow for our own judges to judge our own laws. The Prime Minister’s proposal might be the worst deal ever for this country. It is certainly not the Brexit that people voted for." How can anyone of sane mind think Mays deal, or remaining in the EU for that matter is a good idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinfireman Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 A company is selling a ‘Brexit Box’ survival kit to gullible Remainers, presumably fearful that after Brexit the country will revert to a medieval subsistence state without the means to access heating, food, or clean water. Sounds like the Green Party’s ideal future… The box contains “60 servings of main meals + 48 portions of meats + water filter + firestarter” for a Recommended Retail Price of £384.61. Guido has gone to the trouble of calculating the cost of what goes in to the box, buying regular individual tins and packeted food from high street supermarkets. Even with generously high assumptions, Guido makes the total cost of this Brexit Box’sfood, filtered water bottle, and fire lighter to be £91.55. Presumably the makers of the box assume the self defined intellectually superior Remainer class will be suckers enough to spend an £293.06 more than if they had just popped down to the local shop. The box makers appear to be right, hundreds have been bought by ultra-Remain suckers… MAY,s LAST GASP ATTEMPT................... From: Government Chief Whip Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 2:53:33 PM (UTC+00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London To: Government Chief Whip Subject: Parliamentary Party Meeting today in the Boothroyd Room, 1900 Dear Colleague There will be a Parliamentary Party Meeting with the Prime Minister today at 1900 in the Boothroyd Room. The meeting will be chaired by Sir Graham Brady. With best wishes Julian Rt Hon Julian Smith MP Government Chief Whip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
besty57 Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, pinfireman said: Grantham votes 52% to 48% against Nick Boles! I demand another vote 43 minutes ago, motty said: Don't worry, Oowee will be along in a minute to tell us that it is! Yeah I'll be disappointed if he doesn't, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 2 hours ago, 12gauge82 said: How can anyone of sane mind think Mays deal, or remaining in the EU for that matter is a good idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12gauge82 Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 😂😂😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-G Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 I just thought up a new Brexit slogan: BRITISH VOTES MATTER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panoma1 Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 Well it seems the time has come and more will be revealed as to how our politicians plan to frustrate Brexit and usurp democracy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts