Jump to content

Advice please new scope for over limit AA S410 Xtra


old man
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you use the hawke  amx ret   and zero at 40 yds  I'm presuming your shooting a .22 around 900 fps .  If you use 15 x mag you should have 5 yd intervals out to around 75 yds  

After that it goes off a bit  -  but then you can dial the turrets for drop , which it does extremely well , 

Edited by Ultrastu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ultrastu said:

If you use the hawke  amx ret   and zero at 40 yds  I'm presuming your shooting a .22 around 900 fps .  If you use 15 x mag you should have 5 yd intervals out to around 75 yds  

After that it goes off a bit  -  but then you can dial the turrets for drop , which it does extremely well , 

Thanks.all and Stu, running at 30ftlb with AA 16grn. Used to use Chair gun but won't work on chromebook. Weight for freehand shots always a problem now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, London Best said:

Everyone seems to recommend Hawke scopes. 
 

Why have I never looked through one which has impressed me? 
 

Ever!

The op asked for recommendations, I am happy to recommend them as a piece of equipment and as a company. It's fine if people like different things, healthy competition means choice, which is good.

As to why you're not impressed 🤷🏻‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, old man said:

Thanks.all and Stu, running at 30ftlb with AA 16grn. Used to use Chair gun but won't work on chromebook. Weight for freehand shots always a problem now.

 

The airmax compact range  is pretty light for the magnification  though does have a 30 mm tube . If you have the phone app chair gun  you can use it to dail in drop values into the top turret  coupled with a rangefinder its proven to be very accurate even out to 150 yds for me .

 

2 minutes ago, manthing said:

The op asked for recommendations, I am happy to recommend them as a piece of equipment and as a company. It's fine if people like different things, healthy competition means choice, which is good.

As to why you're not impressed 🤷🏻‍♂️

Reason why I've only got hawke scopes  is that chairgun  was designed along side the reticules . This makes for a formidable combination  for predicting drop, windage , energy, distance etc etc   there are different levels of glass in there scopes (obviously) from budget to excellent .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rim Fire said:

when was the last time you looked through one 

About ten days ago. 
Firstly, I have only ever used two scopes which would not hold zero. A Nikko Sterling which I owned and a Hawke fitted on a borrowed .243 in Africa. Also, neither of them had impressive optics. 
Secondly, I am probably accustomed to better quality scopes on my rifles (not counting air rifles). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, London Best said:

About ten days ago. 
Firstly, I have only ever used two scopes which would not hold zero. A Nikko Sterling which I owned and a Hawke fitted on a borrowed .243 in Africa. Also, neither of them had impressive optics. 
Secondly, I am probably accustomed to better quality scopes on my rifles (not counting air rifles). 

As for not holding zero i think you will find thousands of shooters would disagree with that myself included as for the latter fair enough but he only wants it for a FAC rated air rifle so why would you pay a thousand pound plus 

Edited by Rim Fire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Rim Fire said:

As for not holding zero i think you will find thousands of shooters would disagree with that myself included as for the latter fair enough but he only wants it for a FAC rated air rifle so why would you pay a thousand pound plus 

Fair comments, but it does not alter my impression that every time I look through somebody’s Hawke scope I am unimpressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should imagine .the difference can be in people's eyes .

I know some scopes suit some eyes better than others   mtc for example I find poor (or have done in the past .) 

And there are certainly  some hawke scopes I've looked through that could be better. 

The old addage  swap and sell  your guns as you please    but keep hold of your best scope for ever , is true  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ultrastu said:

I should imagine .the difference can be in people's eyes .

I know some scopes suit some eyes better than others   mtc for example I find poor (or have done in the past .) 

And there are certainly  some hawke scopes I've looked through that could be better. 

The old addage  swap and sell  your guns as you please    but keep hold of your best scope for ever , is true  .

Very true, Stu. 
There are, I believe, different grades of Hawke. I have no idea which models I have used/looked through, but all have seemed poor to me.
I have only used one MTC, on a Daystate, and thought it to be rubbish, starting with a capital ‘S’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, wymberley said:

If you'd care to give me your preferred zero and also your sight height (centre of bore to centre of object lens) I'll see what's what but will have to assume the 30 ftlbs, ie 922 ft/sec.

Thank you but on rethinking I will stay with the Nikko as it's reliable. 

 

As regards others, my worst ever for losing zero was an MTC.

 

Thanks all, it was an interesting exercise.

 

Edited by old man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been working on what to do with my R-10 SE FAC while it's away having a new regulator fitted so this was virtually already done just had to enter your specifics (zero is 50 yards, sight height 1.5"). If it looks as though it'll be of help, but needs the 2 points correcting, just sing out:

IMG-5323-2.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, London Best said:

Very true, Stu. 
There are, I believe, different grades of Hawke. I have no idea which models I have used/looked through, but all have seemed poor to me.
I have only used one MTC, on a Daystate, and thought it to be rubbish, starting with a capital ‘S’.

My guess is the scopes you've looked through weren't set up for you, eye relief,  focus little things that you'd mess with when setting up, but not when it's on someone else's gun.

For what it's worth I'm really impressed with the Optisan EVE 4-16x44pi I've got on my R10, really clear great ret, but I was surprised by the size and weight of it being a 30mm tube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...