Jump to content

vauxhall


armsid
 Share

Recommended Posts

When we have a Gov't who want;

  1. To dictate what the industry can sell (as opposed to the market choosing what it wants to buy) - and pushing it in a direction the market doesn't want
  2. To impose rules on employment that;
  • push up the cost of employment
  • reduce the flexibility of empoloyment
  • makes damaging industrial action easier (always a motor industry weak area)
  • strengthens Union control/influence

then we are bound to see manufacturers moving to build in areas that are cheaper and more 'industry friendly'

Why make products that people don't want - and in a way that is more expensive than your competitors?

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was so much as a single shred of proof that CO2 was causing climate change I would be rooting for Nett Zero. What the hysterics don't grasp is that the supposed personal opinion of a scientist, or even a group of scientists, is not the same thing as science.

As John says above, the combination of Nett Zero lunacy dead set on bankrupting the country and kowtowing to the union Mandarins means it's all downhill from now on. Vauxhall & Stellantis are just the beginning and I can't see Jaguar surviving much longer.

The end of vehicle production in this country is coming and it's not far off. Thank you climate change hysterics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A garage near me was closed for some time, when it re opened there was 4 electric charge points put in, all empty, how much money did they lose being shut, unless the Government really do take the Country to complete collapse with electric cars I can’t see it coming off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/11/2024 at 06:22, JohnfromUK said:

When we have a Gov't who want;

  1. To dictate what the industry can sell (as opposed to the market choosing what it wants to buy) - and pushing it in a direction the market doesn't want
  2. To impose rules on employment that;
  • push up the cost of employment
  • reduce the flexibility of empoloyment
  • makes damaging industrial action easier (always a motor industry weak area)
  • strengthens Union control/influence

then we are bound to see manufacturers moving to build in areas that are cheaper and more 'industry friendly'

Why make products that people don't want - and in a way that is more expensive than your competitors?

You forgot to mention when the country votes to put up trading barriers by pulling out of the EU. 

Vauxhall vans was threatening to pull out when I worked on the restructuring of LDV. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rewulf said:

How did that work out ? 🤣

I managed to get LA's to commit to ordering vans in advance of production. That was enough to secure the loans against the preorder and save the jobs. The rest was painful. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Penelope said:

Especially after that ridiculous advert!!

Never mind the fact that their overpriced cars regularly top the list of most unreliable motors.

A friend of mine has had a new RR Sport every year for the past 10 years, one of them spent 6 months in the shop with electrical issues, he literally have 6 months driving out of it.
Many of them needed new suspension whilst still under a year old !
His son has a brand new Defender, the engine failed at 20,000 miles, they refused a warranty claim because it had gone over its service interval by 1200 miles, thats an ongoing legal battle.

He wont be buying another RR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Never mind the fact that their overpriced cars regularly top the list of most unreliable motors.

A friend of mine has had a new RR Sport every year for the past 10 years, one of them spent 6 months in the shop with electrical issues, he literally have 6 months driving out of it.
Many of them needed new suspension whilst still under a year old !
His son has a brand new Defender, the engine failed at 20,000 miles, they refused a warranty claim because it had gone over its service interval by 1200 miles, thats an ongoing legal battle.

He wont be buying another RR.

I like the full range of LR cars and would have another in a heartbeat if they worked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rewulf said:

Never mind the fact that their overpriced cars regularly top the list of most unreliable motors.

A friend of mine has had a new RR Sport every year for the past 10 years, one of them spent 6 months in the shop with electrical issues, he literally have 6 months driving out of it.
Many of them needed new suspension whilst still under a year old !
His son has a brand new Defender, the engine failed at 20,000 miles, they refused a warranty claim because it had gone over its service interval by 1200 miles, thats an ongoing legal battle.

He wont be buying another RR.

Hence why I now drive a Toyota Hilux.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...