Jump to content

best moderator


gonk69
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've just swapped a SAK for a Wildcat Predator. Hardly any difference at all. Probably would have stuck with the SAK had I known. This is with sub sonic ammo. I believe the differences are far greater using different ammo but I pretty much only use subs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt,you are welcome to come and have a go with my cz which has a scrirroco mod fitted,its fired 800 rounds and i have just cleaned it and the build up of crud shocked me,also the first 3 baffles were starting to deform,ie they have a bulge like ring around them now.

Think eye sell them for £36 :hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheers vamp. picking up me 452 sillouette with hawke panarama 3,9x50 scope and sak mod in the morning, got a great deal, sighting it in in the morning busting bunnies in the afternoon, hows the shooting your side of the woods vamp? cheers matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've used a parker hale, logun, sirroco and currently have a sako and the sako is the most quiet in my opinion and about £30 so fairly cheap too.

:stupid:

 

I found the Sako the quietest too, easy to clean, light and well built.

 

I believe that almost any will do as its the thwack of bullet on skull that sends the others running not the thud from the gun :blink:

Edited by bennyblanco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot of history on this subject.

 

I have both, if you are talking .22lr and Subs then frankly you may as well get the cheapest mod you can find, the difference in sound reduction between any of them in this situation is minimal. So SAK!

 

If you use High Velocity .22lr, HMR or WMR, then the SAK STILL provides the best package, because they are all still going to be noisy. The Sirocco on my HMR died and was replaced by Edgar Bros, I have a SAK on my .22lr and my WMR and when this latest Sirocco dies I will have a SAK on the HMR as well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Dekers that on .22lr with subs almost any moderator will do the job as there is almost no audible difference between them, SAK is a good choice.

I do not rate the SAK very highly for the .17hmr, however, as it is designed for .22 and a dedicated mod for .17, such as a DM80, really does make a very significant difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the sirocco on my CZ .22lr as said in a previous post pretty much the only sound is the fireing pin.

Cleaned it after about 600-700 rounds, was pretty messy and took some cleaning but the way it strips down makes it easy enough. After reading an article in a mag I thought I would coat all parts with a very light smear of gun grease, supposedly to make it easier to clean and author reckoned quieter too! Haven't made my mind up weather it's quieter or not and haven't cleaned it since so we will see!

The article called this running the moderator wet! Has any one else tried this?

The article called this running theroderator

Edited by Mark-70
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the SAK mod stripable? and how easy are they to clean. Not sure what make mine is, its 4" long and has a baffle then a spring, another baffle in the middle then another spring and a baffle at the end. Any ideas? It came with the gun and does a pretty good job, I'd like to try a SAK on my gun to see if there is any difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the SAK mod stripable? and how easy are they to clean. Not sure what make mine is, its 4" long and has a baffle then a spring, another baffle in the middle then another spring and a baffle at the end. Any ideas? It came with the gun and does a pretty good job, I'd like to try a SAK on my gun to see if there is any difference.

The SAK mods are very easy to strip and clean! I have been using one on my 17HMR since I had the gun and it has had something like 2,500+ rounds through it. I clean it around every 100-150 shots and there is no sign of wear and tear and no signs of any burn marks on it.

I have also used both the SAK and the Parker Hale mods on a .22LR and I found no difference noise wise between them but the SAK was a little easier to clean with it's baffle setup in one piece as opposed to the Parker Hale which had the seperate baffle "washers"!

Either way if you use some welders "anti splatter" spray on the baffles when you have cleaned it future cleaning is much easier!

I personally would opt for the SAK for a .22LR every time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SAK mods are very easy to strip and clean! I have been using one on my 17HMR since I had the gun and it has had something like 2,500+ rounds through it. I clean it around every 100-150 shots and there is no sign of wear and tear and no signs of any burn marks on it.

I have also used both the SAK and the Parker Hale mods on a .22LR and I found no difference noise wise between them but the SAK was a little easier to clean with it's baffle setup in one piece as opposed to the Parker Hale which had the seperate baffle "washers"!

Either way if you use some welders "anti splatter" spray on the baffles when you have cleaned it future cleaning is much easier!

I personally would opt for the SAK for a .22LR every time!

 

:lol::lol: Sorry 'frenchie' mate-that just cracked me up!! :lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...