Jump to content

Beretta 682 Sport


Scully
 Share

Recommended Posts

Im not particularly a beretta fan but came across a lovely example of the above at a local RFD. It is black actioned wirh multi choke ported barrels. A very wide rib and comes up bang on the button.

Nice dark if somewhat plain wood and a brass escutcheon in the stock.

Anyone have or had one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A mate of mine has one, I think by your description it is a "Supersport", nice gun in its day and still is now.

There is a distinctive sound to it when shot, I'm guessing because of the ported barrels.

My mate has named his "Teabag" due to the perforations!!!.

 

What was the asking price because they do hold there value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What was the asking price because they do hold there value?

I stand corrected; youre right, it is a Supersport.Had a browse on GT and found another very similar, complete with ported barrels.

RFD has only had it a day or two and doesnt know as yet what to price it at.

Many thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice gun I bought one last week for sporting and skeet. Multi choke 28" barrels in mint condition got some Rhino ported chokes for it. Used it today at sporting and skeet was right on the button very pleased. A quality piece of kit made in the era when Beretta made excellent quality guns, not like the rubbish they churn out nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking as a diehard Browning fan

 

The 682 before the gold E was the best they produced (Excluding the SO series and the ASE)

 

They went slim action with the gold E and spoiled a great gun

 

:shaun:

 

I don't disagree with your first point but old die hard owners of the original spec 682, me included, changed over to the 682E in droves because it is more shootable and handles better. I keep hearing of the old spec being somehow superior mechanically and better made but can't say I noticed any difference in that department.

The Supersport version of the old 682 is well worth a look as it has lovely handling, I have never seen a 32" version but would snap it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't disagree with your first point but old die hard owners of the original spec 682, me included, changed over to the 682E in droves because it is more shootable and handles better. I keep hearing of the old spec being somehow superior mechanically and better made but can't say I noticed any difference in that department.

 

The Supersport version of the old 682 is well worth a look as it has lovely handling, I have never seen a 32" version but would snap it up.

Yes I changed over the new one was that good I traded it in for my old silver action with more weight between the hands it handled much better that the E model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't disagree with your first point but old die hard owners of the original spec 682, me included, changed over to the 682E in droves because it is more shootable and handles better. I keep hearing of the old spec being somehow superior mechanically and better made but can't say I noticed any difference in that department.

 

The Supersport version of the old 682 is well worth a look as it has lovely handling, I have never seen a 32" version but would snap it up.

The reason I said they had spoilt it is purely a personal one

 

I can't get away with slimmer actioned guns, they don't "feel" right to me which is why I prefer a Browning/Miroku

 

:shaun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I changed over the new one was that good I traded it in for my old silver action with more weight between the hands it handled much better that the E model.

 

The trouble with the old one is not the action rather the barrels which made the guns feel nose heavy especially in 32" format, the E solved that issue by removing some rib amongst other things. I love the old guns but a common quip was that they handled like a 4x2 !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The trouble with the old one is not the action rather the barrels which made the guns feel nose heavy especially in 32" format, the E solved that issue by removing some rib amongst other things. I love the old guns but a common quip was that they handled like a 4x2 !

I have 3 of them in 28 and 29.5" and the certainly don't feel muzzle heavy nor do the others I know of most Olympic Skeet shooters one at the top of his game in England.

 

I agree that mine that has a second set of barrels in 32" are slightly front heavy but I like that for Sporting or FITAS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Know its not quite the same gun but I just got a 682 gold e with 30" barrels, shoots great, feels great, already doing better with it then my 687 el. You won't go wrong with it if it fits and you like it- and if you don't you can sell it on for not much less they you bought it for, thats the joy of second hand berettas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...