Jump to content

AYA No 2 OTT Ejection Issue.


Robertt
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have a AYA No 2 which ejects the empty cases an unnecessarily silly distance.

My concerns are, that if a loader for instance caught one in the eye, it would be no laughing matter.

Retreival of empties, especially in woodland is a real pain and shutting the gun is not as easy as it could be.

I don't want to convert it to a non ejector.

I've got a feeling this is not as simplistic as I think but would a straight swap with softer springs do the trick ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Robertt said:

I have a AYA No 2 which ejects the empty cases an unnecessarily silly distance.

My concerns are, that if a loader for instance caught one in the eye, it would be no laughing matter.

Retreival of empties, especially in woodland is a real pain and shutting the gun is not as easy as it could be.

I don't want to convert it to a non ejector.

I've got a feeling this is not as simplistic as I think but would a straight swap with softer springs do the trick ?

 

I did read your penultimate sentence. Posting just in case yopu're not aware of Gough Thomas' solution even though by the sound of it this may not be the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had my aya 2 souped up...stronger springs fitted...the reason was when i was shooting near newmarket we were only allowed to use paper cases as they rotted down quick and wouldnt get caught in a horses throat when they cut for hay...........so thats why you have stronger sprung ejectors...as the paper cases if not kept properly would swell causing ejection issues..........

i used the gun on a GYWA clay day one time with the button pusher standing behind me....i told him to move ...he said shud up and get orn with it.....so i did....one of the cases caught him on the bridge of the nose......he bled like a stuck pig...next time he saw me he was 20ft behind me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

I find most s/s (English as well as Spanish) have over powered ejectors.  I have got into the habit of just putting my hand over them as I open the gun, or turning it slightly away as I open it if I'm in a real hurry to reload. 

Exactly as above, I have always shot side by sides and cannot really say that my AYAs eject any harder than my English guns, you will find that any good loader is more than aware of where your empty shells are going, so just enjoy your No.2, both cases should land next to each other if the ejectors are set right, not that it matters but a gunsmith friend of years ago was adamant that top guns should! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am seeing a gunsmith midweek and will discuss tempering the springs.

It would also be nice if it shut with less effort.

Shooting this week and will take the rangefinder and measure the mad distance these cases travel.

In the meantime I have been ejecting them vertically so they don't land too far away.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Robertt said:

Am seeing a gunsmith midweek and will discuss tempering the springs.

It would also be nice if it shut with less effort.

Shooting this week and will take the rangefinder and measure the mad distance these cases travel.

In the meantime I have been ejecting them vertically so they don't land too far away.

 

 

I`ve got a No4 that had previously had the springs `eased` ,its been a pita since I got it refusing to eject certain makes and has had one spring replaced as a result already .The other will follow....

I`d much rather have too good ejectors personally,especially the way cases are going quality wise !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Robertt said:

ejects well but easily shut.

There is a lot of variation in the closure; on normal (Southgate type and many others) ejectors used on s/s guns, the ejector is an 'over centre' type action. 

The best have the ejector springs compressed over virtually the whole angle through which the barrels move on closure, going finally 'over centre' almost as the breech faces meet the standing breech.  These usually close nicely and easily because the energy used in compressing the ejector springs is spread through the whole closure movement. 

Some seem to do the compressing of the springs more in the initial part of the closure movement, and go over centre well before the gun is fully shut.  In my (limited) experience, these are the ones that feel 'hard' to close, and the action is quite 'uneven' in force through the closure movement.  They also seem to close with a more pronounced 'snap' which can feel quite 'jarring'.  Guns like this are noticeably less 'pleasant' to use.

I have been told that regulating ejectors (and getting it just right) needs a lot of experience and is a bit of a 'black art'.  When just right, the closure should be smooth, progressive and not over stiff at any point, and the ejection should be reliable - and spent cartridges travel out side by side land neatly together as has been stated earlier in this thread.

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...