Jump to content

More Labour woes 🙄


Mice!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just seen the comments made by the Labour transport secretary, oh dear me, apparently comments were cleared earlier in the week? But it's gone very wrong with planned investment getting pulled and Downing Street distancing themselves from her,, WHOOPS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

6 hours ago, Mice! said:

Just seen the comments made by the Labour transport secretary, oh dear me, apparently comments were cleared earlier in the week? But it's gone very wrong with planned investment getting pulled and Downing Street distancing themselves from her,, WHOOPS!

The comments would appear to have been made by several 'Labour Seniors', Louise Haigh (Transport Secretary), Angela Rayner (Deputy PM) and were encouraging consumers to 'boycott' P&O Ferries.

Haigh has been 'reprimanded', but Rayner (who Starmer cannot sack) has not been mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

The comments would appear to have been made by several 'Labour Seniors', Louise Haigh (Transport Secretary), Angela Rayner (Deputy PM) and were encouraging consumers to 'boycott' P&O Ferries.

Haigh has been 'reprimanded', but Rayner (who Starmer cannot sack) has not been mentioned.

Missed thar whats the problem with P&O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sam triple said:

Missed thar whats the problem with P&O

It relates to their 'hiring and firing' practices.  This (in italics) from a news column (Daily Mail) today;

There have been suggestion that Downing Street had carpeted the Transport Secretary to protect Ms Rayner.

The pair both slated P&O's widely criticised actions in 2022 when it suddenly sacked 800 British seafarers and replaced them with cheaper staff mainly from overseas.

In an ITV interview on Wednesday to announce new workers' rights, Ms Haigh said: 'I've been boycotting P&O Ferries for two and a half years and I'd encourage consumers to do the same.

Google will give you more on P&O's actions which were 2 or 3 years ago now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

It relates to their 'hiring and firing' practices.  This (in italics) from a news column (Daily Mail) today;

There have been suggestion that Downing Street had carpeted the Transport Secretary to protect Ms Rayner.

The pair both slated P&O's widely criticised actions in 2022 when it suddenly sacked 800 British seafarers and replaced them with cheaper staff mainly from overseas.

In an ITV interview on Wednesday to announce new workers' rights, Ms Haigh said: 'I've been boycotting P&O Ferries for two and a half years and I'd encourage consumers to do the same.

Google will give you more on P&O's actions which were 2 or 3 years ago now.

Yes remember that happening , thought it may have been that P&O hadn’t given them any “ freebies” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard Quataries own £39B Iin Sainsbury's shares they are now selling up because the new capital gains taxation , a company that was going to pump £1B into British ports has now pulled the plug , this along with another company that pulled £1B investment in North Sea oil and gas , 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not really surprising is it? You take a bunch of inept chancers who have never even had a proper job (most of them) and have spent the whole of their political careers doing precisely NOTHING.

Then suddenly they are Cabinet Ministers running the country. You really couldn't make it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

Then suddenly they are Cabinet Ministers running the country.

Yes.  When you invest in a business (e.g. savings, pensions, life assurance etc.),  one of the things you look for is experience, track record of success, etc. 

It is a similar thing when a business invests in a country.  Your 'due diligence' will want to know what track record is there?  Are the management team experienced in this area?  Do they have a clear strategy for an achievable ambition?   Are they actually independent to make policy and not 'puppets' of others who pull the strings?  Will the business environment they are looking to create (rules on businesses, employment, taxation etc.) be favourable to (our) business

Then look at who we have now running the country - the answer is a "No" on almost every key question.

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

Yes.  When you invest in a business (e.g. savings, pensions, life assurance etc.),  one of the things you look for is experience, track record of success, etc. 

It is a similar thing when a business invests in a country.  Your 'due diligence' will want to know what track record is there?  Are the management team experienced in this area?  Do they have a clear strategy for an achievable ambition?   Are they actually 'puppets' of others who pull the strings?  Will the business environment they are looking to create (rules on businesses, employment, taxation etc.) be favourable to (our) business

Then look at who we have now running the country - the answer is a "No" on almost every key question.

Angela Raynor in particular seems to be blindly pursuing some sort of two dimensional 1960s style of socialism and class hatred

Employers, Bad people

Landlords, bad people

Anyone with money, bad people (Except Lord Alli, it appears)

Very Orwelllian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sam triple said:

Just heard Quataries own £39B Iin Sainsbury's shares they are now selling up because the new capital gains taxation , a company that was going to pump £1B into British ports has now pulled the plug , this along with another company that pulled £1B investment in North Sea oil and gas , 

The company that was going to invest a billion in the ports, actually own P&O that's what's kicked this off.

P&O certainly weren't right in what they did, but you need to look at the bigger picture when this sort of investment is involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mice! said:

The company that was going to invest a billion in the ports, actually own P&O that's what's kicked this off.

P&O certainly weren't right in what they did, but you need to look at the bigger picture when this sort of investment is involved. 

Yes just read that . Doesn’t look like the by elections went to well for them either 

Edited by sam triple
Link to comment
Share on other sites

P&O storm in a tea cup and another example of the lack of experience of some of the new MP's. No doubt this will be turned around.

Which ever way you look at it it's been a cracking start for Kier in the first 100 days. A few nay sayers and a bit of first term wobbles but overall great news for UK plc. The Holtec project is particularly exciting. 

Iberdola £12bn for East Anglia 2 off the Suffolk coast. All down to unlocking the wind auction. 

Orsted £8bn additional offshore wind investment.

BW £300m for battery energy storage facility and EMR battery recycling centre both in Birmingham.

Green Volt £2.5bn off shore floating turbines a world first. 

SeAh £225m Teeside turbine blades manufacturing plant.

Holtec £335m in South Yorkshire for small and large advanced reactor testing, development and manufacture with Sheffield and Coventry research tech centres. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Mice! said:

The company that was going to invest a billion in the ports, actually own P&O that's what's kicked this off.

P&O certainly weren't right in what they did, but you need to look at the bigger picture when this sort of investment is involved. 

P&O weren't right but they were days away from collapsing anyway so there was never going to be a happy outcome for the UK work force unfortunately. 

In politics, as in business, sometimes you have to live in the real world and do what is necessary. Then move on.

Two and a half years later for a cabinet minister to be recommending to the public not to use a commercial company is just not acceptable behaviour and an abuse of office.

Edited by Vince Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TIGHTCHOKE said:

They, the Labour Government, are so far out of their depth it is getting embarrassing..........................:w00t:

Not apparently in everyone's views.  From a post in this thread;

"Which ever way you look at it it's been a cracking start for Kier in the first 100 days. A few nay sayers and a bit of first term wobbles but overall great news for UK plc."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

Not apparently in everyone's views.  From a post in this thread;

"Which ever way you look at it it's been a cracking start for Kier in the first 100 days. A few nay sayers and a bit of first term wobbles but overall great news for UK plc."

Yes, but Oowee is not of this planet...............................:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clangerman said:

yet the tories were doing such a good job 

No they weren't, we know that but Labour claimed (or at least implied) that they had the answers and would do better.

So Labour now have to be judged on what they said they could do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

No they weren't, we know that but Labour claimed (or at least implied) that they had the answers and would do better.

So Labour now have to be judged on what they said they could do.

promising everything and delivering nothing is exactly how they all get in power why else do you think I’m a non voter! lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

No they weren't, we know that but Labour claimed (or at least implied) that they had the answers and would do better.

So Labour now have to be judged on what they said they could do.

Labour promised "Change", but never actually said it would be for the better 🤦‍♂️🤬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clangerman said:

 why else do you think I’m a non voter! lol 

Then you should not take part in the debate. No vote, no point of view

2 minutes ago, JKD said:

Labour promised "Change", but never actually said it would be for the better 🤦‍♂️🤬

Yes you do have a valid point there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...