Jump to content

Why?


Scully
 Share

Recommended Posts

are they getting rid of old stock..?.........they might have thousands in the wharehouses....and will keep selling them as long as they sell...

then when they have got rid of them they will buildthe new generation which people will then upgrade to ...

what do you reckon ?

Edited by ditchman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, mellors said:

If i remember right they had loads of trouble with them cycling cartridges. 

As for steel if that's what it's to be used for then why buy it. 

Not sure I’m following you there.

I don’t know, they seem to be a popular gun, but I don’t think proofing has any effect on cycling capability. 
He bought it because he doesn’t get on with his Benelli, and steel will be what we’re all shooting within a year or so. 
I just wondered why any gun would be proofed for standard steel when all non-steel proofed guns are already capable of handling it? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3.5 inch chamber sx3 is steel proof, surprised that the your mates isn’t.  Is it a 3 inch chamber?

Shadow chaser, just looked on guntrader and there were only 3 new sx3 for sale all 3 inch.  Was one waterfowl model advertised but photos were of an sx4!   Whee have you seen others advertised?  May fancy the sx3 waterfowl if I can find one.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, flippermaj said:

The 3.5 inch chamber sx3 is steel proof, surprised that the your mates isn’t.  Is it a 3 inch chamber?

Shadow chaser, just looked on guntrader and there were only 3 new sx3 for sale all 3 inch.  Was one waterfowl model advertised but photos were of an sx4!   Whee have you seen others advertised?  May fancy the sx3 waterfowl if I can find one.

 

 

It is steel proofed, but NOT HP steel proofed. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ditchman said:

are they getting rid of old stock..?.........they might have thousands in the wharehouses....and will keep selling them as long as they sell...

then when they have got rid of them they will buildthe new generation which people will then upgrade to ...

what do you reckon ?

I reckon you could have a career in marketing for any firm as you hit the nail on the head, sell up quick, produce new model, get punters to want new model.😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Scully said:

which is only proofed for standard steel!

It is my understanding (and you should obviously check with a gunsmith if in doubt) that there is only ONE steel proof - denoted by the Fleur de Lis mark. 

With Fleur de Lis you can shoot steel INCLUDING HP steel (within chamber length limits etc.).  Note that since 2020 the marks don't include 'SUP' anymore - see attached link.

https://www.gwct.org.uk/media/1106151/Proofing.pdf

Without Fleur de Lis, you can shoot standard steel within the chamber and load limits (as appropriate) and with various 'recommendations' such as choke less than 1/2, but should not shoot HP steel.

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

It is my understanding (and you should obviously check with a gunsmith if in doubt) that there is only ONE steel proof - denoted by the Fleur de Lis mark. 

With Fleur de Lis you can shoot steel including HP steel (within chamber length limits etc.).  Note that since 2020 the marks don't include 'SUP' anymore - see attached link.

https://www.gwct.org.uk/media/1106151/Proofing.pdf

Without Fleur de Lis, you can shoot standard steel within the chqmber and load limits (as appropriate ) and with various 'recommendations' such as choke less than 1/2, but should not shoot HP steel.

Apologies for a minor correction. Within the known limits you can shoot steel provided the gun is nitro proofed at a satisfactory level. For some unknown reason, after 40 odd years of its use there is still confusion about this. Some may have taken, "you can shoot steel including HP steel", as 'you need steel proof to shoot steel and then you can also shoot HP steel'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wymberley said:

Apologies for a minor correction.

No problem. 

15 minutes ago, wymberley said:

For some unknown reason, after 40 odd years of its use there is still confusion about this.

I think the reasons are that the various 'experts' (the Proof Houses, Shooting Organisations, some gunsmiths are several magazine articles) etc. have given contradictory advice at times and there is no doubt that there have been examples of damage with steel, but then there always have been occasional failures even in pre steel days.  Additionally, there have been various changes in the marks used in recent years.  For a great many years the 'maximum working load' and chamber length were the ones to look for (e.g. 2 1/2 inch and 1 1/8 oz. was a standard 'game gun' proof).  Then we went to pressure initially in tons per square inch, then went metric - which was in my view less intuitive than the load.

A particular 'gripe' of mine is that the marks currently used by the Proof Houses are often small, badly struck, indistinct and hard to see.  There was an example posted in a recent thread that was very hard to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

No problem. 

I think the reasons are that the various 'experts' (the Proof Houses, Shooting Organisations, some gunsmiths are several magazine articles) etc. have given contradictory advice at times and there is no doubt that there have been examples of damage with steel, but then there always have been occasional failures even in pre steel days.  Additionally, there have been various changes in the marks used in recent years.  For a great many years the 'maximum working load' and chamber length were the ones to look for (e.g. 2 1/2 inch and 1 1/8 oz. was a standard 'game gun' proof).  Then we went to pressure initially in tons per square inch, then went metric - which was in my view less intuitive than the load.

A particular 'gripe' of mine is that the marks currently used by the Proof Houses are often small, badly struck, indistinct and hard to see.  There was an example posted in a recent thread that was very hard to see.

:good:

The change to proof from load and from Imperial to metric all at once was a tad traumatic. The 2020 system - provided you can read it - makes things easier I fancy. This should also phase out the Italian kgs (weight)/kgs/sqcm (pressure) confusion which we occasionally see on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been said by myself and others, this situation is a double-edged sword.  In July of 2020 I picked up a bargain Benelli Montelfeltro, precisely because it was missing a Fleur-de-Lys.  I’d have no issue running HP steel through it, and were that to become a regular occurrence I could always revert to my Hatsan, or pay for proofing if I was really worried.  In the unlikely event it failed, I’d consider that a win for my personal safety and move on…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/10/2022 at 20:42, flippermaj said:

The 3.5 inch chamber sx3 is steel proof, surprised that the your mates isn’t.  Is it a 3 inch chamber?

Shadow chaser, just looked on guntrader and there were only 3 new sx3 for sale all 3 inch.  Was one waterfowl model advertised but photos were of an sx4!   Whee have you seen others advertised?  May fancy the sx3 waterfowl if I can find one.

 

 

Oops - another example of how quickly time passes and you don't realise. 

It's probably a good few years since I actually checked so by now things will have moved on.  

I'm the type of person who says something has only just happened - when in actual fact it was several years ago! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...