Jump to content

To have or not to have..................Shooting Insurance.


cheesypeas
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i suppose the question should be this.

 

has anyone had a claim against them ?

has anyone used there insurance?

Insurance is only useful if and when you need it ,better to have it and not need it than do without and find you do .

 

I travel to france once a year fishing , about a 1200 mile round trip , for each of the last five years I took out european breakdown cover .

This year I decided that as I never ever breakdown , I could save myself £50 , you guessed it I broke down in france , so far it has cost me over £3500 to get things sorted and I am not finished yet .

That £50 now seems like a bargain and its not a mistake I will make again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the requirements for clay shooting only , is it down to the club or the shooter to have insurance ? and is it worth having as a backup

advise would be helpful

cheers

Our Club has its own insurance that covers everyone whilst on our ground,

 

A lot of clubs do, Police wouldnt grant us a section 5C without Insurance

 

:shaun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regard to this 'at fault' bit. Am I not right in thinking that an element of 'showing negligence' is involved?

Yeah thats the word i was looking for and the whole basis for my question, if found 'negligent' then what stance would the insurance company take, im sure they would try and wriggle out of not paying legal fees.

 

Im clearly in the minority here & may have changed my opinion a little on this one, the arguament 'to have' is clearly greater than 'not to have'.

Based on that, I'll look in to it, Thanks for all the replies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah thats the word i was looking for and the whole basis for my question, if found 'negligent' then what stance would the insurance company take, im sure they would try and wriggle out of not paying legal fees.

 

Im clearly in the minority here & may have changed my opinion a little on this one, the arguament 'to have' is clearly greater than 'not to have'.

Based on that, I'll look in to it, Thanks for all the replies.

Don't they always try and stiff the policy holders when it comes to paying out. Most companies take your money quick enough but try their best to hold onto it if you make a claim of any sort (referring to insurance in general, not shooting insurance as such). Always read the small print.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no insurance, no certificate would sort it.

The problem with that though is that there are quite a few who only shoot bought days where the shoot arranges insurance, us for example.

Whilst I feel that everyone who shoots should be a member of a shooting organisation to make insurance mandatory prior to certificate grant is not the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view of insurance is that you only insure things that you cannot either do without or can afford to repair / replace yourself.

 

My guns are not insured. They are worth a couple of thousand pounds but a few years premiums would probably come to that, I am happy to carry the risk.

 

Public liability is completely different. An accident where I was to blame could cause injury or death (death is cheaper!) costing several million pounds and a lifetime of suffering. That I cannot cover.

 

In my view basic public liability or "third party" cover should be compulsory and a condition of using guns. Legal expenses cover is desirable but falls into a different category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check your household cover - majority of insurers include public liability under both contents and property covers. However good to join BASC, CPSA etc as they provide much more in terms of lobbying, technical and legal support.

 

Shop around as some shooting insurance (through likes of CA etc) cheaper as their insurance only cuts in if no other insurance - it's called a non-contribution clause.

 

You thought this was an easy question didn't you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There'll always be a few people that claim it's not for them and prefer to spend the money elsewhere. Given how cheap it can be (four packs of cartridges or a box of .243 ammo) the argument against cost is largely redundant. It primarily boils down to attitude and whether or not shooters think they can 'get away with it'.

 

The whole 'how many people have claimed' stance doesn't wear well with me, I'm not considering insurance because of other's experiences - it's purely down to personal preference and whether I feel it represents value and peace of mind.

 

Might sound a bit off topic but the amount of people I've come across in my career where they wish that had taken out life insurance or critical illness when they were offered it but adopted the stance that 'it'll never happen to me' is frightening. One simple accident that you couldn't foresee wipes can not only have a massive impact on your life, it can ruin the financial status for you and your whole family.

 

I see shooting as a privilege and it can be as expensive or as cheap as I choose to make it but as I'm responsible for some pretty serious kit when compared to golfers or fishermen. I think it's only right to protect myself against external elements I can't control and would threaten my financial stability in the future.

 

I'm more than happy for it not to be compulsory, much like life insurance when you take a mortgage....but as long as people know that they stand to have their pants pulled down if a claim arises then that's their risk

Edited by Therealchucknorris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As some may know, I look after the BASC insurance on a day to day basis, I see every claim that comes in, I sit on 4 claims review meetings a year with our underwriters and brokers, and have several meetings a year with lawyers that represent our members when claims go to court.

 

Shooting accidents are rare, about one a week or so on average on the BASC policy, and a lot of them are property damage claims that cost under £1000 or so.

 

But, as you can imagine, if a person is unlucky enough to be involved in an accident where someone is injured or killed, then the cost of their insurance, and having a well experienced empathetic claims team, and may I say it me, in their corner is worth much more than any of us will ever pay in a life time of membership subscriptions to our chosen organisation.

 

Quite literally one phone call, one simple form, and we do all we can to take the problem away immediately. It cannot take away the pain and guilt or the sleepless nights, but we keep the lawyers from your door, we deal with all the medial reports, the loss adjusters, and all the other things that go on when a large claim comes to pass. If we were not there, then you would be on your own, not an nice place to be...

 

Would I want to fall back on my home insurance? No frankly, I would much rather have a team of experts that knows about shooting behind me. Who wouldn't?

 

So if anyone on here is not a member of one of the organisations then for your sake and for the sake of those that are around you when you go shooting, join this weekend, there is no excuse at all not to.

 

 

David

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As some may know, I look after the BASC insurance on a day to day basis, I see every claim that comes in, I sit on 4 claims review meetings a year with our underwriters and brokers, and have several meetings a year with lawyers that represent our members when claims go to court.

 

Shooting accidents are rare, about one a week or so on average on the BASC policy, and a lot of them are property damage claims that cost under £1000 or so.

 

But, as you can imagine, if a person is unlucky enough to be involved in an accident where someone is injured or killed, then the cost of their insurance, and having a well experienced empathetic claims team, and may I say it me, in their corner is worth much more than any of us will ever pay in a life time of membership subscriptions to our chosen organisation.

 

 

 

Quite literally one phone call, one simple form, and we do all we can to take the problem away immediately. It cannot take away the pain and guilt or the sleepless nights, but we keep the lawyers from your door, we deal with all the medial reports, the loss adjusters, and all the other things that go on when a large claim comes to pass. If we were not there, then you would be on your own, not an nice place to be...

 

Would I want to fall back on my home insurance? No frankly, I would much rather have a team of experts that knows about shooting behind me. Who wouldn't?

 

So if anyone on here is not a member of one of the organisations then for your sake and for the sake of those that are around you when you go shooting, join this weekend, there is no excuse at all not to.

 

 

David

 

Well put David - I rejoined the BASC today after an absence of 10 years, I am also a member of the Countryside Alliance. Edited by browning123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...