Jump to content

Mr Bates v The Post Office


armsid
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, JKD said:

Definitely this /\ /\ /\

How the issues weren't even thought about or discussed by those who 'knew' is a mystery 🤔

Because there was a convenient scapegoat. In any normal business, the service user would be complaining, because the company as a whole would be suffering. But because the Post Office contract stated losses had to be made up by the sub-postmasters themselves not the company, there was no need for any kind of accountability. The Post Office could blame the little people and not trouble themselves with asking questions. It suited the two big parties very well and no one worried about the little party...until it pulled the whole rotten house down!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, chrisjpainter said:

Because there was a convenient scapegoat. In any normal business, the service user would be complaining, because the company as a whole would be suffering. But because the Post Office contract stated losses had to be made up by the sub-postmasters themselves not the company, there was no need for any kind of accountability. The Post Office could blame the little people and not trouble themselves with asking questions. It suited the two big parties very well and no one worried about the little party...until it pulled the whole rotten house down!

👍 I really do hope that some employees of the two big parties get their cummupence !!! At the end of the day, the buck stops with the management, but it's still taken over 20 years to fully hit the headlines 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, old man said:

TBH, I can't differentiate between any of them, parasites?

Got to agree Blair followed his American master and took us to war  , A i will always remember Brown at the gates of Rosyth dockyard , It will never close total lies closed in less than a year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bigbob said:

Got to agree Blair followed his American master and took us to war  , A i will always remember Brown at the gates of Rosyth dockyard , It will never close total lies closed in less than a year 

The definition of a parasite? To feast well enough to thrive, weaken but not kill the host?

Sums them up a  treat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Gordon R said:

I sincerely hope we don't go down the road of the SNP - texts, emails etc disappearing.

Ed Davey has said everyone at the Post Office lied to him. There must be a record - minutes of meetings, who lied, what was said etc.

Time will tell Gordon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, old man said:

Slipping further away from public consciousness daily, all by design of course?

Obviously things are progressing and being investigated, but only new info will be put out on MSM,,,,, as it is this morning 👍

This isn't going away !

Edited by JKD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

And now the story breaks that the independent forensic technical firm was sacked in 2013 when they found the bugs and that the Government as well as the Post Office hierarchy knew it was going on.

The responsible ministers were;

  • 2010-2012  -  Ed Davey
  • 2012-2012. -  Norman Lamb
  • 2012-2013. -  Jo Swinson
  • 2013-2014. -  Jenny Willott
  • 2014-2015. -  Jo Swinson

Source https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/parliamentary-under-secretary-of-state-for-employment-relations-and-consumer-affairs#past-role-holders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agriv8 said:

So reading into that this is not smoke room gossip or whistle blowers emails.

this is in minutes and papers presented to board members. So directors, managers must have signed off the papers?

This therefore points that board members are complicit in the whole saga ?

The Long Long List is getting LONGER...................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corporate manslaughter charges would be impossible to prosecute successfully, but are appropriate.

The number of people who knew about the problems runs into hundreds, if not thousands and could well hinder any prosecution.

Had it been down to one or two, lower ranked employees, I'm sure some sacrificial lambs could have been found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

 

Don't hold your breath though.....................

This is a common comment throughout this thread, unfortunately !!!

This 'saga' is going to take a long time to come to its fruition,,,, another quite common comment..... 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...