Jump to content

Sign of the times


yates
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is it me? I've been interviewing for staff to work as kitchen or domestic assistants. 30 hours per week,minimum wage to begin with and 6 weeks annual leave. I,ve had 3 people decline the position(although not offered yet), as,if they were to take employment with over 16 hours a week they will be out of pocket because their benfits will either cease or be reduced. One even worked out they will loose just under £400 of what ever benefit entitlement they recieve per month. Unbelievable, what ever happened to work ethic or pride. They may not be the best paid positions but will lead to bigger and better opportunities next year. Moan over....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There is something wrong with both the system and the attitude of many people.

 

The system should not be designed in such a way that it can work out as good or better to remain on benefits instead of working, where is the incentive to work?

You have to actually want to work to do so if you are not gaining anything from it, but unfortunately a large amount of people are too lazy and would rather not work.

 

Bring on benefit cuts, make people work for their benefits so it is easier to get a job, and pay people with food, clothes and rent instead of money.

Then if you want a new washing machine, hairdryer, laptop, phone and a TV you have a reason to go out and work for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you said they are not the best paid positions,if the money paid was a realistic wage they would be filled no problem,we now live in a society were you are supposed to be gratefull to have a job that pays peanuts,and lets be honest the minimal wage is peanuts,thats why young peaple cant leave home and stand on there own feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you said they are not the best paid positions,if the money paid was a realistic wage they would be filled no problem,we now live in a society were you are supposed to be gratefull to have a job that pays peanuts,and lets be honest the minimal wage is peanuts,thats why young peaple cant leave home and stand on there own feet.

to be blunt what planet are you on? Of course you can you just have to live within your means
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is something wrong with both the system and the attitude of many people.

 

The system should not be designed in such a way that it can work out as good or better to remain on benefits instead of working, where is the incentive to work?

You have to actually want to work to do so if you are not gaining anything from it, but unfortunately a large amount of people are too lazy and would rather not work.

 

Bring on benefit cuts, make people work for their benefits so it is easier to get a job, and pay people with food, clothes and rent instead of money.

Then if you want a new washing machine, hairdryer, laptop, phone and a TV you have a reason to go out and work for it.

 

Agreed.

It's called the poverty trap and one of the big ways that helped people out of it was the 10k limit on tax. Effectively, if you earned 10k or under you did not pay tax. Guess who scrapped it.. Yup Gormless Gordon.

 

KW, is that a flat £185 a wekk or do bills like rent etc have to be paid out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you said they are not the best paid positions,if the money paid was a realistic wage they would be filled no problem,we now live in a society were you are supposed to be gratefull to have a job that pays peanuts,and lets be honest the minimal wage is peanuts,thats why young peaple cant leave home and stand on there own feet.

 

Exactly. Mine is a low paid industry but I would not dream of paying my staff the minimum wage, let alone expect them to live on it. If someone is worth employing their worth a wage they can live on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard the same thing when i left school in 1983, i just got on with getting on in life including a YTS but even when i married in 1993 ( aged 27 ) , it was only two salaries coming in that allowed us to buy a small house ( £77,000 was the price).

 

I do not see what is different now.

 

i did not know of anyone that could afford their own place until their mid to late 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£6.21/hour is peanuts?

It would be a big pay rise for me.

 

I thought it was 6.19?

If it was a fiver an hour I would still want to work

I am 21 and struggle at times but i am alive and get out shooting abit

I hate not been able to work, I don't do sick days

Used 2days of my 4weeks holiday last year...saddo I know but I like been able to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you said they are not the best paid positions,if the money paid was a realistic wage they would be filled no problem,we now live in a society were you are supposed to be gratefull to have a job that pays peanuts,and lets be honest the minimal wage is peanuts,thats why young peaple cant leave home and stand on there own feet.

 

totally agree ,well said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...