Jump to content

surprise surprise......sgc revoked for farmer who was attacked.


Recommended Posts

GHE - you might well know a bit about the law. I have more experience in that area than most.

 

I have jumped to no conclusions. The matter before the court is whether your son was justified in firing the gun in the way that he did, or whether there were other options. You might not like the other options, but they did exist.

 

The Police evidence may be right or wrong, but it might turn out to be a side issue, with no bearing on the judgement of the court.

 

If I were to accept your experience in law, then your son has nothing to worry about. How can he fail?

 

Let me be clear. I admire you for supporting your son. I wish both him and yourself well.

 

I am not sure that he will win - that's life.

Edited by Gordon R
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

I am well aware of the meaning of "innocent" - perhaps a little more than you. He has been cleared of committing any crime, but the Police presumably are calling his judgement into question . Wrongdoing would include shooting, when another course of action was possible.

 

Therein lies the crux of the matter.

Gordon, we are all aware of your background but do you think you could have made your first sentence a little less patronising? The guy is facing a serious financial burden, the cessation of Bills pastimes and a load of (probably) unwanted publicity and all through no fault of his own. It may be better if some of the legal minded on here tried to do something about the abject sentencing, police wrong doing etc rather than lecture some poor sod whose found himself in the doodoo.

 

Not a pop at you personally, I just feel for the bloke tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GHE - you might well know a bit about the law. I have more experience in that area than most.

 

I have jumped to no conclusions. The matter before the court is whether your son was justified in firing the gun in the way that he did, or whether there were other options. You might not like the other options, but they did exist.

 

The Police evidence may be right or wrong, but it might turn out to be a side issue, with no bearing on the judgement of the court.

 

If I were to accept your experience in law, then your son has nothing to worry about. How can he fail?

 

Let me be clear. I admire you for supporting your son. I wish both him and yourself well.

 

I am not sure that he will win - that's life.

You're absolutely right that he may not win, very few of these appeals are successful. We knew that risk but felt it necessary to go ahead against the odds.

 

Yes, he did have other options, there are always other options.

1. He could have shot him dead

2. He could have done nothing and waited to see whether his mother survived

3. He could have stepped in front of his mother, held up his arm and said "I say, stop" - which would have worked about as well for him as it did for Captain Ralph Binney

4. He could have hoped that the police would turn up in the nick of time, just like Superman - after all, the nearest police car was only 7 miles away.

 

In a way, this has nothing to do with his use of a shotgun, it is really just about the use of force and the fact that the implement of force happened to be a shotgun isn't really relevant.

 

There is some written evidence that can never be published, doing so would amount to a breach of priviledge. But I will publish full details of public domain evidence once the case is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following this case and the young farmer is innocent of any crime. He was never even charged.

 

Despite this, they took away his licences and refuse to give them back, forcing him to go to court and spend a fortune to represent himself. The appeal is for the return of licences by an innocent man, to restore his career.

 

I don't know Bill but the case is familiar in tone to certain other revocations which have taken place and it's our job to make sure that the police cannot simply do this on a whim, for political reasons. Any one of us placed in his position would have acted in the same way. There is no premeditation here, no malice. He reacted to an immediate threat to life and limb and happened to have a shotgun with him at the time, as was his right.

 

This is a young kid who was forced into a situation he didn't ask for, forced to act and now finds his entire future career at stake, all because some idiot decided to steal metal and try to hurt him and his mother with a massive van.

 

On the issue of costs, I believe the police have a special dispensation which means that win or lose, the lad could be responsible for paying the police costs. So his current bill of £50k, could skyrocket. Yet he still did not do anything wrong and only wants his licence restored, as an innocent man.

 

Surely we have a duty to help this lad out?

Edited by notsosureshot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish you and your son all the best. I realise it's something of a side issue but I'm just interested in what liability lies with the police for the apparent damage to the guns they confiscated. I note the quote that it looks like they played hockey with them and the guns have been ruined, can you claim compensation from the police for this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish bill all the best of luck in court,i hope he gets his licence back,the lad did nothing wrong in my eyes protecting his mum like he did.good on him!i think he had great restraint in only shooting the van and not the theif.ill deffo donate some money if this crowd fund thing is set up.ATB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish you and your son all the best. I realise it's something of a side issue but I'm just interested in what liability lies with the police for the apparent damage to the guns they confiscated. I note the quote that it looks like they played hockey with them and the guns have been ruined, can you claim compensation from the police for this?

The police have a duty of care. Problem is, because we didn't know this was going to happen we weren't able to take details photos of the guns and so can't prove that they are responsible for the damage. They put the guns, complete with ammo, in the back of a police car and left them unattended (if any of us did that we'd be in trouble) and didn't bother with the gun slips. It's mainly damage to woodwork and scratches on the metalwork, the .243 rifle was obviously banged on the ground because the screw thread for the modeerator is badly damaged. The gun that he actually used in the incident now has a badly pitted barrel, they had it from Aug 2012 until June 2013 but of course didn't clean it. All guns and rifles are also rusty, obviously stored somewhere damp.

 

I wish bill all the best of luck in court,i hope he gets his licence back,the lad did nothing wrong in my eyes protecting his mum like he did.good on him!i think he had great restraint in only shooting the van and not the theif.ill deffo donate some money if this crowd fund thing is set up.ATB

Thanks. The crowdfunding appeal IS set up and running and I'm amazed at people's generosity, it will make a real difference, win or lose Please click here, http://www.gofundme.com/mivt00 and at the bottom of the page you will see a link to more details

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish you and your son all the best. I realise it's something of a side issue but I'm just interested in what liability lies with the police for the apparent damage to the guns they confiscated. I note the quote that it looks like they played hockey with them and the guns have been ruined, can you claim compensation from the police for this?

Good luck getting compo off the police! Back in the days of paper MOT they took mine as it didn't have a stamp, contacted the issuing garage who confirmed it was genuine but hadn't been stamped, then promptly lost it and told me I'd have to get it re-examined at my own cost as they have an exemption of responsibility for confiscated items

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole story boils my blood, being treated like a criminal due to someone else trying to rob...

 

GHE - I hope that your son gets his guns back, and that you win the case. If I had any spare cash I would certainly help out however I am struggling to keep head above water at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole story boils my blood, being treated like a criminal due to someone else trying to rob...

 

GHE - I hope that your son gets his guns back, and that you win the case. If I had any spare cash I would certainly help out however I am struggling to keep head above water at the moment.

Thanks for that.

On the subject of donations, every donation will help - but we certainly don't expect people to donate and we understand that not everyone who would like to help financially is able to do so.

 

With or without more donations, we will manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case is now over, in that all the evidence has been completed and closing submissions made by both counsel, there is now nothing more to be done.

We will get the decision tomorrow afternoon, it could go either way, frankly I'm not feeling very optimistic but my view is that, win or lose, we have tried.

I'm told that this is the longest certificate appeal ever, with 7 days of evidence. No doubt it's the most expensive too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldnt of happened in America lol

Don't be so sure!

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/12/markus-kaarma-killed-german-teen_n_6667370.html

 

Although in fairness, that case looks more like a 'Tony martin' rather than this case.

 

Best of luck GHE! Wasn't the law of self-defence recently 'revised' so that the force just had to not be 'grossly disproportionate', rather than 'reasonable' or does that only apply within the walls of the house?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...