UKPoacher Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 How you going to leave? In the back of a lorry obviously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ph5172 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 (edited) When they said children i stupidly thought they meant 'proper' children!!! you know the sort of children everyone else in the country thinks of as children and you see on the way to school or playgroup! I would even go as far as to say i would take one in at my expense if it means a (child) child would get a chance of a decent life......... all the ones i have seen are far from children and no one in their right mind would say they are... come on at 16 you are hardly a child........ it wasn't that long ago we were sending our own who were a lot younger that any of those i have seen in the paper,to sit in a trench and get machine gunned!!! On a side note. a news story on the BBC spoke to the brother of one of refugees who came here 11 years ago and last saw his brother when he was a toddler....... he said even after 20 years you never forget your brothers face... well if he saw his brother when he was a toddler and that was 11 years ago (well 20 as the slip of the tounge suggests) the 'child' would have been around -7 when you left? or he is a lot older than he claims, genuine lost in translation or slip up? Edited October 20, 2016 by ph5172 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Green Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 This has done so much damage to the credibility of the whole process. People are so stupid and they don't realise the consequences of that stupidity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRDS Posted October 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Most people wanted the process to work the other way, reunite the chancers who made it over illegally with their offspring in Calais. Mainly the Luvvies and the cretins in Parliament that see it differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortune Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I don't think that she might be so amused if the 13 year old child did naughty things to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest1957 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2016/oct/20/refugees-and-cindy-crawfords-daughter-an-age-old-problem-for-the-tabloids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollieollie Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I think the comment was a bit tongue in cheek. But your question is very valid,if they are honest refugees seeking sanctuary ,then of course they would submit to most inspections to prove their age ect. But then again ,if they were honest ,genuine refugees,they would have claimed asylum in the first safe country they arrived in,and then perhaps transferred to the UK later if they had family ect here. Instead they decided to trek across multiple safe countries,then hole up in a filthy camp full of peadophiles and sex traffickers ,before attempting to cling/break into lorries and trains and illegally attempt to enter the country they have chosen. Strange that... Very tongue in cheek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest1957 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/20/age-checks-on-refugee-children-would-be-intrusive-inaccurate-and/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) I see the jug eared leftie Lineker is now involved! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3852104/Gary-Lineker-sparks-Twitter-row-blasting-utterly-heartless-treatment-child-migrants-arriving-Calais.html Edited October 21, 2016 by TIGHTCHOKE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Radio 4 a couple of days ago a report on a lady that took in a refugee child, I didn't hear if she adopted him or not, but he was aledged to be 14, even though he had heavy stubble. A dentist during a routine appointment she took him to said 'no chance', at least 25 years old, she was distraught. I actually thought that was quite funny to be fair. If you cant tell the difference between a 14 year old and a 25 year old ,well ... The NWO which is why Merkel is flooding Europe. They don't want waring nations with national pride they want a placid Europe populated by a mixed race with no national identity supplying dirt cheap labour to big business. http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/ Probably a lot more truth to this than you can imagine. The only way this sort of plan could work is if the whole world was in on it. Remove national pride,patriotism,call it what you will, from a country ,tends to weaken it considerably to other more nationalist,aggressive nations. History has confirmed this analysis multiple times over,even in recent years. So,if every government,dictatorship ,head of state or whatever and whoever runs the nations of the world is in on it,then that beggars the question. What are all these everyday conflicts all about ? ISIS ,Russian expansionism ,conflict is in the media constantly,every day without fail. Is it all just smoke and mirrors,an idea implanted within our everyday thoughts to make us believe 'You are not safe' Might be a bit far out for some people to digest,but think about it,if patriotism and nationalism are the first casualties of the New World Order ,then the first part of the plan has nearly been accomplished. Look at the run up to Brexit for example,and how wanting to get away from the EU was considered xenophobic,racist,nationalist....nazi. Look at the US election process, Clinton,globalist,liberal,anti 2nd,pro immigration ect vs Trump ,Nationalist,pro 2nd ,anti immigration. The media heavily biased for Clinton,but look at the rhetoric directed against Trump,like its wrong to be a patriot and want to protect your countries borders. Interesting times ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longspoon Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Hand wringing do-gooders and self serving publicity seekers, read Allen woman, will totally destroy everything the hard working people of this nation have built over the centuries. If this country were a business, how long would we survive employing people that only took wages without contributing work.....you'd go bust in no time. We as a country cannot and should not allow in anyone who will not contribute to the common good, and only become a drain on our resources....we don't need them and don't want them. They are in France, not England, French problem, not ours...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Hand wringing do-gooders and self serving publicity seekers, read Allen woman, will totally destroy everything the hard working people of this nation have built over the centuries. If this country were a business, how long would we survive employing people that only took wages without contributing work.....you'd go bust in no time. We as a country cannot and should not allow in anyone who will not contribute to the common good, and only become a drain on our resources....we don't need them and don't want them. They are in France, not England, French problem, not ours...... All good points. But mentioning what Lily Allen did and said,particularly the line 'I apologise on behalf of my country' What did she mean by that,who is she apologising for ? You,me,the government,everyone who is a Brit national ? This is the kind of mindset I was talking about in my last comment,being somehow embarrassed to be British,because we let these things happen. Anti nationalist. Whose fault is it that the Jungle even exists? Whose fault is it that there are unaccompanied children there? Why has no one in French social services/child protection took over their care,they are after all in France ? Why do French border control not question/arrest/detain these unidentifiable people,who cant even show their age, as potential security risks/illegal immigrants ? The whole matter, like the camp itself,stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longspoon Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Rewulf.....well said . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 I am certain that Lily Allen will house all these people. If she doesn't, I could be forgiven for thinking she is a hypocritical idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 I am certain that Lily Allen will house all these people. If she doesn't, I could be forgiven for thinking she is a hypocritical idiot. The funny thing is Gordon ,she could probably afford to do quite a lot toward just that. And still be able to live very comfortably afterwards. But her ilk rarely reach into their very deep pockets to actually do something about it. Its all about free airtime and self promotion. Pretending to be selfless and caring,whilst really being selfish and grabbing. They make me sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Green Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) I am certain that Lily Allen will house all these people. If she doesn't, I could be forgiven for thinking she is a hypocritical idiot. The thing about her is she has a legendary reputation for rudeness towards people such as taxi drivers, shop assistants, watresses and the like. Yet she goes over there and gets all emotional about the people in the jungle camp. You don't think it had something to do with the fact that she took a film crew with her do you? Edited October 21, 2016 by Vince Green Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 You don't think it had something to do with the fact that she took a film crew with her do you? Or shes got a new album out soon ? http://www.josepvinaixa.com/blog/lily-allens-fourth-studio-album/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsbob Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Perhaps she should go there in the dark unaccompanied to get a "real feel" for the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old'un Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 The news this morning.......the next lot of "children" coming in today 200-300, the news cameras were there showing the greeting area where the coaches will pull-up, Well it looks like we wont see this lot because they have put up scaffolding and a covered walkway so no one can take pictures of the "children" this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Well so much for transparency then. Might infringe the poor mites privacy though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Bb Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 The news this morning.......the next lot of "children" coming in today 200-300, the news cameras were there showing the greeting area where the coaches will pull-up, Well it looks like we wont see this lot because they have put up scaffolding and a covered walkway so no one can take pictures of the "children" this time. I got quite excited when they said they'd put up a scaffold but it appears I was wrong as usual................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 I got quite excited when they said they'd put up a scaffold but it appears I was wrong as usual................ You naughty man! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 If there is nothing to hide, then why the covered walkway? It stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveboy Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 The charity involved stated that one of the children (the one who looked 35) was in fact an aid worker. They had to retract that statement later in the day when it turned out to be one of the "children" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longspoon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 I had hoped for better from May....pandering to the French, what part of they are not our responsibility does she not understand ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts