Jump to content

Thinking of pulling the trigger on a nice over under.


Recommended Posts

Get an older model Beretta they’re much better made. 

Do you need 3” chambers? 

Clays and all walked up game birds you should only need 2 3/4 shells (70mm) anyways. 

If duck also do you need to use steel? And need 3”? 

This might be a factor in picking up an older model. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Lloyd90, I have 3 Beretta's a 692 that is a couple of years old, a 682X Trap from the early 90's and a mid 80's S686 Special.  I have had issues with the 692 including a failed ejector and lower barrel not always firing.  In fairness both were fixed for free by the dealer and its been fine since but for a gun that cost around 3 grand I was disappointed.  the 686 is my wifes gun and has never missed a beat its in great condition and feels as tight as a new one it cost me around 800 pounds.  My jewel in the crown though is my 682X trap, bought from a friend that had probably only used it a few dozen times, its nearly mint.  Both of my older Beretta's feel far better made than my new 692 despite being way cheaper the 682X is a big and heavy gun 32" multichoked barrels and a monte carlo stock yet when mounted feels as light as a feather.  I also have a Perazzi MT6 that is a lovely gun but even that feels a bit agricultural compared to the 682.  If it were me I would look out for a 682 series gun with the older wider receiver (I think they are referred to as pre Graystone in the USA) buy a good one and it will outlast you.  Parts are easy to find and cheap (Cole's Gunsmithing in the US are the experts) and can be almost entirely rebuilt to be good as new again.  

 

 

007A2A86-9F03-45D3-B296-38AC44086F56.JPG

Edited by Wingman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NoBodyImportant said:

I been thinking about picking up a nice over/under.  I’m looking at the beretta 690 field 1.   I also like the new beretta silver pigeon with the rounded forearm.  It has to have a rounded forearm as I hate the other style.  Any other ones I should look at.  

I too like the rounded forend 

I have a 28 bore and that has a beautiful forend, wish my 20 did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, figgy said:

Why not a nice grade Browning, you seem blessed with some real nice ones in USA.

If your wanting Beretta for field use I'd go for the silver pigeon and have the forend reshaped. 

A nice grade 4 or 5 687. 

The new silver pigeon comes with rounded forearm.  I actually like the browning but the forearm on them are unfortunate.  I think the Ruger red label is the best looking shotgun ever made but I can’t find rifled chokes for it. 

3C698CE5-6AC8-406B-B7C7-E0B04BBAFB6D.jpeg

I really do like the look of the red label,  and I can get them used for around $1500 but the lack of after market chokes is a turn off. But man they look good. 

936FED13-BE3E-4621-8A9B-CA9BF2EF6378.jpeg

71782A18-677E-4F15-A098-940A361CB398.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Ruger looks like a Merkel shotgun.  Surely the choke manufacturers will make you some chokes.

Don't let the forend put you off a gun, you could a new one made.  A certain Mr Winsuar in America makes some stunning stocks and forends.

The older 682 Supersport is a nice gun, the ones without gold in their name.

Edited by figgy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could buy a Browning with a trap fore end? I’m not keen on schnabel fore ends either, and when I take out one of my Winchester sporters I often put on them the trap fore end from my 8500. 

I agree regarding the red label. I’ve only ever seen one in this country, and it came up bang on the button; an extremely good fit. Well made and just about indestructible, like all Rugers, but it was in 20 bore so it didn’t happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OP asked about a Beretta 690, and so far no-one has commented about one !  Two of my neighbors have recently bought 690's for game shooting, both having previously used 686 Game guns.  Their performance has been markedly better with the 690's , possibly due to the stock shape, and the longer barrels , which make for a steadier swing .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a 690 field 1 in 20 bore in February. like you I cant stand the schnable foreend, the rounded one looks so much nice IMO. I also have a 1989 686 onyx and the two are certainly different beasts, although not in a bad way. The newer budget 68 series guns are definately built to a budget these days, the 12 bores feel a bit fat in the hands compared to the older guns of which my 686 onyx feels more elegant. The 690 field replaced the 687, its a nice piece of kit and if it performs like my 686 it will be just fine.

 

, DC699FE6-F70E-4CD3-AD75-8C5DF593F6CC.JPG.efe80305aefe9b1caa1e984e9459374d.JPG44693063-8AF8-4BB5-8044-F62F3BC48B01.JPG.272d0591a018c1430eb7d6d751148027.JPGIMG_1363.JPG.f425e6efe336ed7db0fd2edb3021fd2e.JPGIMG_1365.jpg.7b77a4074b2a4b4bc88af5f25b5d5550.jpg

Edited by shalfordninja33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/07/2019 at 05:22, shalfordninja33 said:

I bought a 690 field 1 in 20 bore in February. like you I cant stand the schnable foreend, the rounded one looks so much nice IMO. I also have a 1989 686 onyx and the two are certainly different beasts, although not in a bad way. The newer budget 68 series guns are definately built to a budget these days, the 12 bores feel a bit fat in the hands compared to the older guns of which my 686 onyx feels more elegant. The 690 field replaced the 687, its a nice piece of kit and if it performs like my 686 it will be just fine.

 

, DC699FE6-F70E-4CD3-AD75-8C5DF593F6CC.JPG.efe80305aefe9b1caa1e984e9459374d.JPG44693063-8AF8-4BB5-8044-F62F3BC48B01.JPG.272d0591a018c1430eb7d6d751148027.JPGIMG_1363.JPG.f425e6efe336ed7db0fd2edb3021fd2e.JPGIMG_1365.jpg.7b77a4074b2a4b4bc88af5f25b5d5550.jpg

That’s a good looking shotgun.  

On 05/07/2019 at 04:44, cardigun said:

The OP asked about a Beretta 690, and so far no-one has commented about one !  Two of my neighbors have recently bought 690's for game shooting, both having previously used 686 Game guns.  Their performance has been markedly better with the 690's , possibly due to the stock shape, and the longer barrels , which make for a steadier swing .

Yea I think I’m pretty set on it.  I just need to see it in person.  High end shotguns are hard to find around here.  I can’t buy a $2500 shot gun sight unseen.  I need to hold it first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...