B686 Posted Friday at 18:47 Report Share Posted Friday at 18:47 I see the two twits who attacked the police at Manchester airport have been charged . Only with ABH though . , thought breaking a female police officer’s nose and blatantly attacking other officers would have got a charge of GBH. Already getting away with it if you ask me. Be interesting to see what they get, especially as nowadays posting hurty words on the internet gets jail time. More two tier keir justice on its way I reckon , hope I’m wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luckyshot Posted Friday at 19:19 Report Share Posted Friday at 19:19 Suspended sentence at most, truly a laughing stock our justice system is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd90 Posted Friday at 19:53 Report Share Posted Friday at 19:53 33 minutes ago, Luckyshot said: Suspended sentence at most, truly a laughing stock our justice system is. On video punching Police officers in the head / face … I reckon they’re looking at time. Additional offence of assault on an emergency worker. If the judge has any sense, they’ll also take into account they were part of putting out that heavily cut video trying to play the victims… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie to this Posted Friday at 20:07 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:07 I see the CPS have finally seen sense and all it took was for Reform UK to bring private prosecution.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnphilip Posted Friday at 20:13 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:13 3 minutes ago, Newbie to this said: I see the CPS have finally seen sense and all it took was for Reform UK to bring private prosecution.......... Yes well done reform , just need the Southport one sorted and the labour counciler who did the throat cut gesture aswell . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougy Posted Friday at 20:16 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:16 Was it due to the pressure of the case being take by Reform or not ? guess we wont know but likely be fed a load of tosh as per usual. No action being taken on the police involved which is good, but no doubt will have a protest by the family and followers of the thugs. The question will be if there is any protests, what will the actions be from the dreamer Starmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmamonster Posted Friday at 20:45 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:45 It's a good job the attackers weren't 80 years old otherwise the be in prison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted Friday at 20:52 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:52 What a shower of XXXX this whole damned set up is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Bear Posted Friday at 20:55 Report Share Posted Friday at 20:55 Was there audio on the video , perhaps we can do them for "Hurty words" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armsid Posted Friday at 23:41 Report Share Posted Friday at 23:41 why does it take action by third parties to get court action when the evidence is in plain sight and no action taken by the authorities incase it offends Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie to this Posted Saturday at 07:24 Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:24 2 hours ago, MaxHardcore said: They are lucky it didn't happen in the States or else they would now be six foot under. Not just the states, I'd say almost anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted Saturday at 08:36 Report Share Posted Saturday at 08:36 8 hours ago, armsid said: why does it take action by third parties to get court action when the evidence is in plain sight and no action taken by the authorities incase it offends Maybe because of the interference from above where idleness and disinterest in hard work are deemed gold standard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveboy Posted Saturday at 09:15 Report Share Posted Saturday at 09:15 Maximum sentence for ABH is 5 years..... needs to be at least 3 years to avoid uproar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westley Posted Saturday at 09:21 Report Share Posted Saturday at 09:21 4 minutes ago, daveboy said: Maximum sentence for ABH is 5 years..... needs to be at least 3 years to avoid uproar. The Defendants solicitor is already making noises about a 'fair trial' for his clients, backed by the family. I won't hold my breath over any custodial sentences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B686 Posted Saturday at 11:59 Author Report Share Posted Saturday at 11:59 We all know there would have been long custodial sentences straight away if a couple of things were different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mice! Posted Saturday at 21:51 Report Share Posted Saturday at 21:51 I saw this the other day and thought great, now deal with the idiots who started this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.