Jump to content

The Next General Election.


TIGHTCHOKE
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

So what if the EU doesn't agree :hmm:

Will Labour just say oh well we tried.

 

14 minutes ago, oowee said:

It simply does not matter what the EU thinks. A member state is free to enhance any standard set by the EU. 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

Thank you. The EU has absolutely nothing to do with worker's rights. It's Nations that decide on worker's rights. And the UK's are better than most.

So why are Labour and others spouting that the EU do :hmm: is it subterfuge!

No, the EU say "Member states should have..." then it is up to the member states to define the scope of, in this instance, those workers rights. It's like delegation if you like, not subterfuge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

14 minutes ago, henry d said:

 

 

No, the EU say "Member states should have..." then it is up to the member states to define the scope of, in this instance, those workers rights. It's like delegation if you like, not subterfuge.

No our Parliament along with trade unions and indeed the workers themselves, are responsible for the worker's rights we all enjoy in the UK.

The EU has nothing at all to do with it.

So it is political subterfuge to suggest that they do. If the EU was to tell us to scrap all worker's rights would our parliament, trade unions and indeed the workers themselves just blindly obey. Of course not, because the EU myth that they are responsible for them is just that a myth. 

And anyone using that myth to try and further their goal is indeed using subterfuge, howerver people try to dress it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

No our Parliament along with trade unions and indeed the workers themselves, are responsible for the worker's rights we all enjoy in the UK.

The EU has nothing at all to do with it.

 

 Four main fields of EU regulation of labour rights include (1) individual labour rights, (2) anti-discrimination regulations, (3) rights to information, consultation, and participation at work, and (4) rights to job security. In virtually all cases, the EU follows the principle that member states can always create rights more beneficial to workers.

The removal of these minimum EU protections is the aim of the Tories in favour of a free market approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

No our Parliament along with trade unions and indeed the workers themselves, are responsible for the worker's rights we all enjoy in the UK.

The EU has nothing at all to do with it.

So it is political subterfuge to suggest that they do. If the EU was to tell us to scrap all worker's rights would our parliament, trade unions and indeed the workers themselves just blindly obey. Of course not, because the EU myth that they are responsible for them is just that a myth. 

And anyone using that myth to try and further their goal is indeed using subterfuge, howerver people try to dress it up.

Yeah, you are right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rewulf said:

Boris hasn't said it,  you have. 

EU regulations cover things like:

  • The working time directive, which limits the number of hours people can work
  • Maximum amounts of particular pollutants there can be in the air
  • Requirements for workers doing the same jobs to be paid equally.

They set minimum standards below which government cannot go. After Brexit, UK governments would no longer have to abide by these minimum levels.

In the new Brexit deal finalised this week, references to a level playing field were removed from the legally-binding withdrawal agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, oowee said:

 The removal of these minimum EU protections is the aim of the Tories in favour of a free market approach. 

I seriously doubt that. There's no political upside in alienating voters, nor does it square with free market economics, but even if it is their aim, it's going to be a long way down on the priority list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Westward said:

I seriously doubt that. There's no political upside in alienating voters, nor does it square with free market economics, but even if it is their aim, it's going to be a long way down on the priority list.

All depends on which trade rules you want to follow or adopt, those of the EU or those of the US. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oowee said:

In the new Brexit deal finalised this week, references to a level playing field were removed from the legally-binding withdrawal agreement

Which means that we going to go back to the feudal system? Righto. 

 

7 minutes ago, oowee said:

All depends on which trade rules you want to follow or adopt, those of the EU or those of the US

So everyone who trades  with the US has to adopt US trade rules? Righto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mice! said:

Caught a bit of Corbyn being interviewed earlier,  when asked about Brexit and the fact he said they would honour the referendum result he answered that there is poverty in Scotland?

I didn't catch much but come on. 

I think you need to find out what exactly was said.

Was it to do with if labour came to power there would not be a second Scottish referendum for 5(?) years as we need to concentrate on brexit? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mice! said:

It was on in the brew room, I only know what I said, hoping others had seen it 

It's a bone of contention here as the SNP have been neglecting health care ( particularly drug deaths) education etc but happy to promote independence and spend on more popular and vote winning ideas at the expense of the poorest in society. That's why he didn't want to allow second referendum within 5years of a labour win, but I believe Bojo has said similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said:

If true, surely she can be prosecuted as I assume red squirrels are protected?

She's got form for it 😂

https://www.trendsmap.com/twitter/tweet/1190635607812399104

Some sites claim the slingshot video is fake, and Swinson has denied its her. 

The shooting video, so far, has attracted no comment from herself or the libs (dem part removed for accuracy) 

Edited by Rewulf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...