Fellside Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 9 minutes ago, London Best said: We (shooters) do not “prey” on anything. The species we shoot are quarry, not prey. Semantics only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Best Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 Seventy odd replies on this thread and the only one required was ‘yes’. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 9 minutes ago, London Best said: Seventy odd replies on this thread and the only one required was ‘yes’. I did try that at the start……😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gas seal Posted January 26, 2022 Report Share Posted January 26, 2022 Hi 70 odd replies and the answer is still yes with authority and no without. The man who asked the question hasn’t replied to any one. Maybe he quit his job or got the sack, but he could have replied. Could a member who can use a computer better than me please print the part of the licence that says ( who can use this licence) thanks. It should help the man . He could have just read it himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 26, 2022 Report Share Posted January 26, 2022 I believe the terms are; "As a land owner, occupier or authorised person, use this general licence to kill or take certain wild birds to conserve wild birds, flora or fauna of conservation concern" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gas seal Posted January 26, 2022 Report Share Posted January 26, 2022 Almost, again it’s the terms and conditions quoted any of the above may not be able to use it. The license is quite specific as to who can use it. Maybe we are discussing different licenses, l refer to the English licence. This is really interesting for such a simple question. All he had to do is Google it, He could have done that in the field on his phone. That’s what the kids are always telling me just Google it. I hope he gets sorted, he’s had enough answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 26, 2022 Report Share Posted January 26, 2022 1 hour ago, Gas seal said: Almost, again it’s the terms and conditions quoted any of the above may not be able to use it. The license is quite specific as to who can use it. Maybe we are discussing different licenses, l refer to the English licence. This is really interesting for such a simple question. All he had to do is Google it, He could have done that in the field on his phone. That’s what the kids are always telling me just Google it. I hope he gets sorted, he’s had enough answers. He had enough answers on the first page! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilovemyheckler Posted January 27, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 Thanks for all the replies and as I see it (and I may be wrong) you can only shoot Jays under General Licence 40 and then only to conserve endangered woodland birds. there is a specific list of endangered species. Intrestingly Woodcosk are on the list so you could shoot a jay if woodcock are around but you can also shoot woodcock so this is a bit of a contradiction? If challenged would the shooter not have to prove that at least one of those endangered species was present in the woodland? With regard to permission to shoot many of the above have said that the gamekeeper can give permission to shoot Jays but legally the only person who can give permission would be the landowner or the owner of the shooting rights? Although the gamekeeper could be one of those on alot of shoots the gamekeeper is only an employee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 Still overthinking it then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 6 hours ago, ilovemyheckler said: Thanks for all the replies and as I see it (and I may be wrong) you can only shoot Jays under General Licence 40 and then only to conserve endangered woodland birds. there is a specific list of endangered species. Intrestingly Woodcosk are on the list so you could shoot a jay if woodcock are around but you can also shoot woodcock so this is a bit of a contradiction? If challenged would the shooter not have to prove that at least one of those endangered species was present in the woodland? With regard to permission to shoot many of the above have said that the gamekeeper can give permission to shoot Jays but legally the only person who can give permission would be the landowner or the owner of the shooting rights? Although the gamekeeper could be one of those on alot of shoots the gamekeeper is only an employee There isn’t a contradiction with woodcock. If you shoot them in December and January you have a 97% chance of shooting a Eurasian migrant (GWCT, 2021), rather than a UK native bird. It’s the UK nesting pairs which are of key concern. Hence being red listed and a legit’ reason for shooting jays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gas seal Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 Hi yes it’s GL40 the jay is only on this one, some birds are on different licenses for different reasons. If you are shooting woodpigeon with authority and then shoot a jay you will need authority to shoot the jay and use a different licence. Just be sure you can (rely ) on the license for your actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 Perhaps succumb to analysis paralysis, and do nothing…….?! Or….. if you have permission, crack on and shoot them! That’s all ‘authority’ means. Its as simple as that really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gas seal Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 Authority is needed to kill the jay . Did the man who shot it have authority. Yes the license is simple it’s black and white. Not a grey area anymore. Is it a case of looking for a reason to kill the jay or killing the jay for a reason. If you have authority and keep to the conditions then the license you can rely on the license. If l was asked to shoot jays l would want to see why Before shooting them the same as I do with other other birds on the licence. I would have to show good reason for taking action. When using any of the licences the user has to show why they took action . I would say that the man who shot the jay would have no idea of what red listed dicky birds were in area he was shooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted January 27, 2022 Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 I think this has gone round in circles long enough. Over and out. Happy jay shooting all……..🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 8 hours ago, Fellside said: I think this has gone round in circles long enough. Over and out. Happy jay shooting all……..🙂 Amen to that, listening - OUT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaymo Posted March 4, 2022 Report Share Posted March 4, 2022 No it’s not ok to shoot Jays- I can’t run very fast and it hurts!!! Oh, you don’t mean me 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted March 4, 2022 Report Share Posted March 4, 2022 Blimey, it was a long day in the sim, wasn't it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker570 Posted March 4, 2022 Report Share Posted March 4, 2022 On 24/01/2022 at 23:08, Gas seal said: The man asked if jays can be shot on a driven pheasant shoot. The only answer is yes if they have authority. No if they don’t. The first question always asked by the police will be have you got a gun license and have you got authority to kill the birds. Has anyone looked at the license to see who can use it . When it can be used. And were it can be used. This is the only reason why the license works. This was the first thing I looked for and noticed that it was for two years. The license is no trap it gives immunity from prosecution. This. I have a wood which houses a large number of red listed birds and as the owner I give myself permission to control the jays, magpies and any other 'rodent' likely to damage the future of these little birds. BUT if your a guest on the shooting area, estate then ask for permission. Simples. Usually at the start of a driven game day we ask what winged vermin they would like shot and also are grey squirrels in trees classed as ground game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merseamal Posted April 7, 2023 Report Share Posted April 7, 2023 On 20/01/2022 at 19:40, Fellside said: The GLs are very open to interpretation and full of confusing contradictions. They are written that way to avoid legal challenge. There is no reference as to when the red listed species can be protected. I personally have no hesitation in shooting jays. It is up to each individual as to whether they wish to control them or not. ‘Illegal’ though…… doesn’t have any relevance in this context. Think you’ll find the general license very clear and no need for interpretation. Jays kill red list young therefore as you say, fine to kill them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted April 8, 2023 Report Share Posted April 8, 2023 15 hours ago, merseamal said: Think you’ll find the general license very clear and no need for interpretation. Jays kill red list young therefore as you say, fine to kill them. So suddenly I’ve got you marking my homework from over a year ago….?! The GLs are riddled with contradictions in several key areas - precisely to avoid legal challenge. That is the nature of the beast. As for the jay, yes fine to shoot. We’re all surrounded by red listers anyway. I trust the OP might have shot a few in the last year or so since seeking advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enfieldspares Posted April 8, 2023 Report Share Posted April 8, 2023 Well just tell them that if it was good enough for Colonel Downham then it's OK enough for you too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted April 8, 2023 Report Share Posted April 8, 2023 12 minutes ago, enfieldspares said: Well just tell them that if it was good enough for Colonel Downham then it's OK enough for you too. Yes - and great for the authentic ‘Dunkeld’. Makes a lovely summer grilse fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dessyb Posted April 24, 2023 Report Share Posted April 24, 2023 On 21/01/2022 at 10:08, Old farrier said: Shot a jay and a magpie on a pheasant day was billed £37 each at the end of the day so you should Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted May 29, 2023 Report Share Posted May 29, 2023 On 24/04/2023 at 14:42, dessyb said: so you should Why? 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted June 7, 2023 Report Share Posted June 7, 2023 I think this one has been done to death, time to put it to bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts