Jump to content

Firearms fees proposals - time to act


David BASC
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

n

 

 

 

Fruitloop seems to have misread the paper, which actually states "Variation (not like for like)"

 

There was, a little while ago, talk by ACPO to amending the rules so that like for like's could be done without the need for a variation, perhaps the above wording suggests that it is in the pipeline

 

It would be fantastic if it got sorted its a pain in the bum if you fancy something nicer in the same cal but currently have to flog yours, wait for 1 for 1 and then finally get it. I speak as someone in TVP area who generally only take a couple of weeks to do it if I was in some of the other regions I read about I dont think I would bother ever swapping.

Edited by Zetter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

.

 

There is a short section in the consultation asking: The fees and costs for firearms licences administered by the police have to be reviewed annually. Do you have any comments on how the review process should be taken forward?

 

BASC recommends: An annual inflation-linked review with a five year full review of police costs, procedures and service delivery."

 

I think people should answer no to this question. It will give the govenrment the excuse to hike the fee on a yearly basis.

Edited by Steppenwolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cannon, this is for GB but could be an important marker for NI

That's what I'm thinking. The licencing over here is obviously considerably different, but my concern is that this will be used as an excuse to hike the fee without providing transparent cost evaluations, or increasing the licencing process efficiency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think also the shooting organizations like BASC and CA should really push on our behalf some things which will also cut costs like 10 year licences and allowing dealers to do 1 to 1 variation. This can be marketed to the Home Office as reducing workload for the police while cutting red tape, no real concern that it's a loosening of security over who gets firearms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think also the shooting organizations like BASC and CA should really push on our behalf some things which will also cut costs like 10 year licences and allowing dealers to do 1 to 1 variation. This can be marketed to the Home Office as reducing workload for the police while cutting red tape, no real concern that it's a loosening of security over who gets firearms.

i wrote the same things in the survey... :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm I will reply to the consultation once I have read the full proposals. Annual review worries me! I can see a grant this year at £50 and renewal in 5 years at well over £100 the annual costs are still put of step with car driving licence s and passports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i doubt anyone can complain about the extra cost,a very small rise.so well done to all concerned.can we now take it that as part of these discussions the question of service levels have also been addressed.will the home office for example be reminding the various counties forces of the current firearms rules and that as this is a full cost rise.and no further pilot schemes will be allowed such as durham medical reports.also the time some forces take for both grants and renew.while I as everyone does welcome any increase being kept to a minimum I think it a false economy if the level of service shows no improvement.

 

 

I've a feeling FAC/SG license holders in Durham will have no improvement at all for the increase in fees,

 

if anything, the service Durham rolls out ATM is getting worst not better...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've filled in the consultation and commented that I find the proposals acceptable.........on the proviso that the police agree a service level agreement with the shooting representative organisations to standardise and improve the service.

I further suggested that, as the main reason the police gave for requesting an increase in licence fees was because it was not self financing and in these days of budget cuts cost them money! which they can no longer afford, that certificates should be renewable at ten year intervals rather than the current five years!.........simplistically that could cut the financial and administration costs to the police by approx 50%.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting what did they try and raise them too for NI?

 

the cost of medical reports is potentially a much bigger cost than the cert....I think that needs clarification as does a robust SLA with procedures set in place for adherence an Ombudsman for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...