J98330040M Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 Hi everyone, I have recently inherited an extremely well-kept 12 gauge side-by-side which dates to 1905. It’s a double trigger non-ejector boxlock, and my only 12g. It’s chambered for 2 3/4 but I’d feel more comfortable with 2 1/2. All in proof! Up until now I have primarily shot .410, a side-by-side and my Mossberg hushpower. I’ve put some old paper-cased 32g 6’s through it on the weekend and the thing kicks like a mule, would anybody be able to recommend a decent pigeon cartridge: 2 1/2 inch (65mm) cheap reliable reduced recoil! thanks in advance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matone Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 (edited) Hull Comp X 28gr.........Hull Intercomp 24gr.........Hull 3 Crowns (not cheap!).......Hull Imperial 26gr (same). Cheddite Universal Trap 24gr 71/2 (English 7) 23/4 but still ok in light gun. Hth. Edited March 26, 2021 by matone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wymberley Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 As a starter for ten, I'll chuck in what I use for the same reason as you've asked - Gamebore SuperGame Hi Bird 28g. For me, these are better than Impax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old farrier Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 Is it kicking because it’s probably proof for a 1..1/8 oz load try any of the lighter 1 oz loads or maybe it’s too short in the stock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 36 minutes ago, Old farrier said: Is it kicking because it’s probably proof for a 1..1/8 oz load try any of the lighter 1 oz loads or maybe it’s too short in the stock I.E it doesn't fit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenholland Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 i put eley impax through my 1891 william powell hammer gun they don't kick , kill well to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old farrier Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: I.E it doesn't fit! Just a different way of saying it 😂 Edited March 26, 2021 by Old farrier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob85 Posted March 30, 2021 Report Share Posted March 30, 2021 32g 6s will give a bit of boot in a light gun but do make sure it's not coming off the face and in need of a rejoining. If you're decoying pigeon or keeping range sensible and want a light cartridge try a 21gram load, I use them in my side by side AYA yeoman if I take it out on the skeet stand. Should have plenty of oomph to take down a 25-30yard pigeon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno22rf Posted March 30, 2021 Report Share Posted March 30, 2021 I use xpress super light fibre 21g in my older guns, if she's over 100 years old do you really want to shove 32g through her? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Best Posted March 30, 2021 Report Share Posted March 30, 2021 In the early 20th century the standard charge for a 2 1/2 inch chambered 12 bore was 1 1/8 ounces, 32 grams. Maybe the powder was a little more gentle in those days? The velocity may have been lower, but not by a great deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno22rf Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 Agreed London Best, but the guns were not 100+ years old then 🙃. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkom Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 There is usually a very good underlying reason for a vintage gun to turn up with low mileage in the present day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old farrier Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 1 hour ago, harkom said: There is usually a very good underlying reason for a vintage gun to turn up with low mileage in the present day. Very true found one that had its stock broken and had been in the cabinet for the last 30 years awaited repair 😊 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Best Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 4 hours ago, bruno22rf said: Agreed London Best, but the guns were not 100+ years old then 🙃. I don’t believe that makes any difference providing the gun has been looked after properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old farrier Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 2 hours ago, London Best said: I don’t believe that makes any difference providing the gun has been looked after properly. And there’s the problem we have no idea how it was looked after by the 3 generation’s that owned and used it before us very few of us have had the same gun for 100 years longest I’ve had one is 49 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno22rf Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 3 hours ago, London Best said: I don’t believe that makes any difference providing the gun has been looked after properly. You'll go over my knee if you keep on!!!! Metal ages and weakens over time, besides this my main concern is the long term care of some of these pieces, sure, some careful string of owners may have tended the gun over the last century plus but surely it decerves to be treated gently and hopefully saved for future generations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Best Posted March 31, 2021 Report Share Posted March 31, 2021 1 hour ago, Old farrier said: And there’s the problem we have no idea how it was looked after by the 3 generation’s that owned and used it before us very few of us have had the same gun for 100 years longest I’ve had one is 49 years Obviously. But you can see if it’s rotten with rust or if the barrels do not measure properly or are off the face. Condition is everything, not age. My youngest are both Spanish, proved in 1974 and 1962. My everyday driven gun is 1930 and I have three made around 1900. The other two are older, one much older at 1865. The other one is, admittedly, ropey. I do not consider any of them to be delicate because of their age. 4 minutes ago, bruno22rf said: You'll go over my knee if you keep on!!!! Metal ages and weakens over time, besides this my main concern is the long term care of some of these pieces, sure, some careful string of owners may have tended the gun over the last century plus but surely it decerves to be treated gently and hopefully saved for future generations? Noooo! Not the knee again, pleeeese I treat all guns gently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J98330040M Posted April 10, 2021 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2021 (edited) For anyone interested, I shot 30 out of 50 clays this week using Hull Comp X 21g 7.5 - they were an absolute dream to use, gun handled perfectly. Would recommend. Going to get some of the 28g to try on the pigeons. Edited April 10, 2021 by J98330040M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matone Posted April 10, 2021 Report Share Posted April 10, 2021 I`m sure you`ll find them suitable! I`ve recently been using Eley Select and found them to be very soft shooting too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jasonk Posted April 10, 2021 Report Share Posted April 10, 2021 Shoot a side by side myself Damascus barrel vintage lyvale express supreme game 30g of six shot kill very well and smooth to shoot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker570 Posted April 11, 2021 Report Share Posted April 11, 2021 On 26/03/2021 at 14:49, Old farrier said: Is it kicking because it’s probably proof for a 1..1/8 oz load try any of the lighter 1 oz loads or maybe it’s too short in the stock On the nail. I have my grandfathers old BSA Side by side and take it out occasionally and compared to my 410 it does kick a bit even though the stock has been altered to my fit. The fact you are used to very light recoil and the stock may not be perfect could be a major reason. Plenty of light shooting 12 gauge shells out there some listed above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old farrier Posted April 11, 2021 Report Share Posted April 11, 2021 13 minutes ago, Walker570 said: On the nail. I have my grandfathers old BSA Side by side and take it out occasionally and compared to my 410 it does kick a bit even though the stock has been altered to my fit. The fact you are used to very light recoil and the stock may not be perfect could be a major reason. Plenty of light shooting 12 gauge shells out there some listed above. It could also help a semi pistol grip putting the op hand into the incorrect place for a good fit there are many reasons for a gun to kick a bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmm243 Posted April 13, 2021 Report Share Posted April 13, 2021 I shoot a Charles Lancaster with 2.5" chambers.Mainly for smipe and woodcock but also flighting duck and some pigeon and the occasional day at driven pheasants/partridge. For the woodcock I use Eley select in a 7.5 which is very soft shooting.For ducks,pigeon and driven game I shoot Supreme game 6's in 30gm,again I do not notice anything unpleasant about the recoil. I am not sure of the weight of the gun but it has 30" Damascus barrels and is reputed to have been made around 1880.I have had it for 31 years,in that time it has had two overhauls.One was to service,rebrown the barrels and fit a butt pad.The more recent was to relay the barrels,fix a broken elector spring and give her a really good service. Hopefully with care she will do me for another 31 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.C Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 Think we might need a picture for the sbs club when you have a moment. I have something from the same period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feltwad Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 You will find that prior to 1900 most guns were only black powder proof if nitro is to be used for safety sake they should be reproofed for nitro Feltwad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.