royal del and Rodney

[clangerman]

what an earner for Charlie and co over £20 million a piece for the pair of them from contracts with nhs schools charities and our forces tax free! not hard to see the fools in this country are us! 

[oldypigeonpopper]

59 minutes ago, clangerman said:

what an earner for Charlie and co over £20 million a piece for the pair of them from contracts with nhs schools charities and our forces tax free! not hard to see the fools in this country are us! 

Hello, I watched this on TV, That is only the main income and there was a lot more minor contracts bringing in together around 50 million £s a year ??, Even Prince William on a nice earner and then bleats on about the Homeless , Did you see the Property portfolio ?? £1000 per year rent on a sewer pipe ?? What an 👀 opener!!!!

[enfieldspares]

Like the lie about the Royal Yacht Britannia being in fact a hospital ship for use in war. All believable by us gullible punters until the Falklands War exposed the truth. It was the only ship in the fleet using that particular type of fuel oil and so could not sail to the South Atlantic and be used as a hospital ship. I don't begrudge Charles his income but I do when it is being charged to the NHS, to schools, to the Army, Royal Navy and whatever and including prisons and ferries and the like used for public benefit paid for from the public purse. He should be stripped of them and the land that causes them to be charged taken into state ownership. It is ridiculous that the taxpayer is paying the monarch these fees and rents on such land.

[ditchman]

11 minutes ago, enfieldspares said:

Like the lie about the Royal Yacht Britannia being in fact a hospital ship for use in war. All believable by us gullible punters until the Falklands War exposed the truth. It was the only ship in the fleet using that particular type of fuel oil and so could not sail to the South Atlantic and be used as a hospital ship. I don't begrudge Charles his income but I do when it is being charged to the NHS, to schools, to the Army, Royal Navy and whatever and including prisons and ferries and the like used for public benefit paid for from the public purse. He should be stripped of them and the land that causes them to be charged taken into state ownership. It is ridiculous that the taxpayer is paying the monarch these fees and rents on such land.

"state ownership"...........you are 'avin a larf...........and then what labour will do with them eh?...they will give them to the train drivers pension fund or summut like that

[clangerman]

4 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

Hello, I watched this on TV, That is only the main income and there was a lot more minor contracts bringing in together around 50 million £s a year ??, Even Prince William on a nice earner and then bleats on about the Homeless , Did you see the Property portfolio ?? £1000 per year rent on a sewer pipe ?? What an 👀 opener!!!!

worse part is after grifting the services they will put their false faces on and have the gall to lay a wreath talk about insult! 

[oowee]

Bin the Royals. Property to the Nat Trust. 

[ditchman]

43 minutes ago, oowee said:

Bin the Royals. Property to the Nat Trust. 

you 'avin a larf.....they are sooo woke ...they would sell it off and give the proceeds to the reparations club

[bruno22rf]

49 minutes ago, oowee said:

Bin the Royals. Property to the Nat Trust. 

Are they not kicking tenant farmers off their land?

[oowee]

2 minutes ago, bruno22rf said:

Are they not kicking tenant farmers off their land?

Give them the right to buy. Set them free from slavery. My neighbour proudly tells me his family have farmed the land for the last 500 years. They are tenants of the Dutchy. 

[welsh1]

54 minutes ago, oowee said:

Bin the Royals. Property to the Nat Trust. 

They charge about £10 just to park in their car parks, and will try everyway to extort money out of you, thry would have doubled the rent and halved the lenght of time.

[bruno22rf]

Just now, oowee said:

Give them the right to buy. Set them free from slavery. My neighbour proudly tells me his family have farmed the land for the last 500 years. They are tenants of the Dutchy. 

Great idea but how many Farmers could afford to buy their land and could the NT sell it as surely it belongs to the nation?

[welsh1]

4 minutes ago, oowee said:

Give them the right to buy. Set them free from slavery. My neighbour proudly tells me his family have farmed the land for the last 500 years. They are tenants of the Dutchy. 

So the Dutchy are good landlords then if your friends family have been there for 500yrs.

[oowee]

2 minutes ago, welsh1 said:

So the Dutchy are good landlords then if your friends family have been there for 500yrs.

They have no where to go. They are mates with Charlie who used to visit as Dutchy.

We have covenants to the Dutchy on our place. They wanted us to resurface the car park with brown resin stone. 

[Minky]

BUT, like the Lorial tv advert... they're aving it because they're worth it.!  The money doesn't exist. IF PROFESSIONAL agents were dealing with the properties the rent would not be less and the money would be scammed off into some private company.  At least with the royal family the vast majority goes into the local economies and upkeep of these properties for the good of the nation.  Who would you rather have it.? Scargill or Corben types like the present labour gov who are going to tax out of existence family farms.

[oowee]

10 minutes ago, Minky said:

BUT, like the Lorial tv advert... they're aving it because they're worth it.!  The money doesn't exist. IF PROFESSIONAL agents were dealing with the properties the rent would not be less and the money would be scammed off into some private company.  At least with the royal family the vast majority goes into the local economies and upkeep of these properties for the good of the nation.  Who would you rather have it.? Scargill or Corben types like the present labour gov who are going to tax out of existence family farms.

Jeepers 🤣

I want a nation of equals. Inherited privilege has no place in a democracy. 

[clangerman]

22 minutes ago, Minky said:

BUT, like the Lorial tv advert... they're aving it because they're worth it.!  The money doesn't exist. IF PROFESSIONAL agents were dealing with the properties the rent would not be less and the money would be scammed off into some private company.  At least with the royal family the vast majority goes into the local economies and upkeep of these properties for the good of the nation.  Who would you rather have it.? Scargill or Corben types like the present labour gov who are going to tax out of existence family farms.

you forgot to mention most of money they are pocketing comes from tax payers hard to see how ripping us all of can benefit the country but it definitely benefits these two shysters! 

[enfieldspares]

"Yes, that's very interesting, but when can I expect the rent?"

Edited November 4 by enfieldspares

[Old farrier]

3 hours ago, clangerman said:

you forgot to mention most of money they are pocketing comes from tax payers hard to see how ripping us all of can benefit the country but it definitely benefits these two shysters! 

Would you rather the money paid for wildfowling leases go to sir kier

or the crown estates

[oowee]

26 minutes ago, Old farrier said:

Would you rather the money paid for wildfowling leases go to sir kier

or the crown estates

I would rather it went to UK plc rather than some random dude that happens to be born in the right place at the right time. Why should our countries assets belong to some random?

[clangerman]

1 hour ago, Old farrier said:

Would you rather the money paid for wildfowling leases go to sir kier

or the crown estates

we are talking their secret contracts with the nhs schools charites and the services who are funded by tax payers so almost £50 million out of all our pockets including yours! 

[old man]

16 hours ago, enfieldspares said:

Like the lie about the Royal Yacht Britannia being in fact a hospital ship for use in war. All believable by us gullible punters until the Falklands War exposed the truth. It was the only ship in the fleet using that particular type of fuel oil and so could not sail to the South Atlantic and be used as a hospital ship. I don't begrudge Charles his income but I do when it is being charged to the NHS, to schools, to the Army, Royal Navy and whatever and including prisons and ferries and the like used for public benefit paid for from the public purse. He should be stripped of them and the land that causes them to be charged taken into state ownership. It is ridiculous that the taxpayer is paying the monarch these fees and rents on such land.

Crack Charlie an email?

12 hours ago, oowee said:

Bin the Royals. Property to the Nat Trust. 

Really?

Just another playground for a few?

[oowee]

41 minutes ago, old man said:

 

Just another playground for a few?

Thats a good point. Maybe another model with better access.

[Scully]

As with all matters such as this, I think to myself…..’If they took all the wealth and privilege from the Royals ( or whoever is bearing the brunt of this weeks wealth envy by the masses ) what difference would it make to my life ?’  The answer of course is none. 
There will always be the haves and have nots, and there will always be those who resent the haves. 
Yes, it can stick in the craw that there are those who exist in a world of wealth and privilege, even at the expense of the tax payer, but the royals don’t have the monopoly on that. 
We aren’t going to revolt, so our only option is to vote, and if you don’t vote then all you have left is to whinge on social media. 
There’s a lot wrong with this country ( and politicians are the cause either by policy, neglect or indifference ) but this doesn’t even feature on my list of priorities. 

[Penelope]

10 minutes ago, Scully said:

As with all matters such as this, I think to myself…..’If they took all the wealth and privilege from the Royals ( or whoever is bearing the brunt of this weeks wealth envy by the masses ) what difference would it make to my life ?’  The answer of course is none. 
There will always be the haves and have nots, and there will always be those who resent the haves. 
Yes, it can stick in the craw that there are those who exist in a world of wealth and privilege, even at the expense of the tax payer, but the royals don’t have the monopoly on that. 
We aren’t going to revolt, so our only option is to vote, and if you don’t vote then all you have left is to whinge on social media. 
There’s a lot wrong with this country ( and politicians are the cause either by policy, neglect or indifference ) but this doesn’t even feature on my list of priorities. 

👍

[claydodger]

49 minutes ago, Scully said:

As with all matters such as this, I think to myself…..’If they took all the wealth and privilege from the Royals ( or whoever is bearing the brunt of this weeks wealth envy by the masses ) what difference would it make to my life ?’  The answer of course is none. 
There will always be the haves and have nots, and there will always be those who resent the haves. 
Yes, it can stick in the craw that there are those who exist in a world of wealth and privilege, even at the expense of the tax payer, but the royals don’t have the monopoly on that. 
We aren’t going to revolt, so our only option is to vote, and if you don’t vote then all you have left is to whinge on social media. 
There’s a lot wrong with this country ( and politicians are the cause either by policy, neglect or indifference ) but this doesn’t even feature on my list of priorities. 

👍👍