Jump to content

The General Election 2015 The Pigeon Watch vote/poll


Boromir
 Share

Pigeon Watch General Election poll 2015  

302 members have voted

  1. 1. What Political party will you be voting for?

    • Conservative Party
      126
    • Labour Party
      15
    • Liberal Democrats
      3
    • Scottish National Party
      9
    • UK independence party(UKIP)
      125
    • Green Party(E,W,S&NI)
      2
    • Plaid Cymru
      3
    • Democratic Unionist Party
      1
    • Sinn Féin
      4
    • Social Democratic and Labour Party
      0
    • Ulster Unionist Party
      0
    • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
      0
    • Independent
      1
    • Undecided
      13


Recommended Posts

I don't get this Labour=workers thinking. I have worked since leaving school at 16. I was educated at a local comprehensive. I have got where I am today through hard work, honesty and common sense. In my opinion if you want to better yourself you vote conservative. If you want to live off of somebody else's hard work then you vote labour. voting ukip means you are a frustrated Conservative. Lib Dems/greens means your medication needs increasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't get this Labour=workers thinking. I have worked since leaving school at 16. I was educated at a local comprehensive. I have got where I am today through hard work, honesty and common sense. In my opinion if you want to better yourself you vote conservative. If you want to live off of somebody else's hard work then you vote labour. voting ukip means you are a frustrated Conservative. Lib Dems/greens means your medication needs increasing.

I was filling up reading this then realised you are in banking so assume its tongue in cheek.

 

KW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic.......UKIP for me......they may not be perfect, but neither are the rest of them,this country needs radical and transformational change. UKIP will not win but hopefully will get enough seats to have influence and show what they can do before the next election and it will then be make or break for them.

Britain for the British with British values first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genuine question: why do people think it is that the opinion on this forum seems to be so different from not just the country as a whole but also the countryside as a whole: UKIP and Tories on more than 40% each, with Labour on less than 4% is wildly unrepresentative.

 

Crudely characterised, it would suggest that this forum is more overwhelmingly right wing than any other imaginable cohort of British society.

 

I've always thought that characterising shooters as right wing was a gross oversimplification perpetrated by people who didn't actually know many shooters.

 

Whereas if this poll is to be believed (and it's already a fair sample), it would actually seem to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just cannot get away from the idea that a vote for UKIP is a defacto vote for Labour.

 

In some seats yes, but in others it's quite the opposite and a vote for the Tories would be a vote for Labour. Depends on the demographic.

 

Of course if we had a fairer voting system where every vote could make a difference then strategic voting would become a thing of the past. The EU elections use a form of proportional representation and last years results were a bit of an eye opener for some.

Little wonder the 'bigger' parties don't want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You say that as if being 'right wing' is a bad thing?

As it happens, that's my personal view, but that's not at all what I was trying to say. I'm just interested in people's views about why the forum is so out of kilter. In the safest Conservative seat in England (a very rural one), labour gets 15% of the vote in a bad year. Whereas on here they're at less than 4%; and most shooters, of course, as BASC's recent research shows, live in cities.

Edited by Pothunter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it happens, that's my personal view, but that's not at all what I was trying to say. I'm just interested in people's views about why the forum is so out of kilter. In the safest Conservative seat in England (a very rural one), labour gets 15% of the vote in a bad year. Whereas on here they're at less than 4%; and most shooters, of course, as BASC's recent research shows, live in cities.

The vote is skewed because this is a shooting forum and most shooters think Labour would put further restrictions on shooting and gun ownership, conservatives are less likely to do so!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In some seats yes, but in others it's quite the opposite and a vote for the Tories would be a vote for Labour. Depends on the demographic.

 

Of course if we had a fairer voting system where every vote could make a difference then strategic voting would become a thing of the past. The EU elections use a form of proportional representation and last years results were a bit of an eye opener for some.

Little wonder the 'bigger' parties don't want it.

I am genuinely torn on PR, i agree with you entirely that every vote should count and our current system does not reflect that at all, but if PR is based on list votes as it is in Scotland with partial PR and also the EU elections then you don't have individual responsibility and accountability.

 

There are some Scottish MSPs that simply would never get there in first past the post, they are shockers. Likewise with MEPs in all parties.

 

I like the local accountability, in so much as it exists, and I don't want to vote for people on a central list.

 

Not sure what the answer is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genuine question: why do people think it is that the opinion on this forum seems to be so different from not just the country as a whole but also the countryside as a whole: UKIP and Tories on more than 40% each, with Labour on less than 4% is wildly unrepresentative.

Crudely characterised, it would suggest that this forum is more overwhelmingly right wing than any other imaginable cohort of British society.

I've always thought that characterising shooters as right wing was a gross oversimplification perpetrated by people who didn't actually know many shooters.

Whereas if this poll is to be believed (and it's already a fair sample), it would actually seem to be true.

This forum would never be representative for a poll of wider society, it is elective in that we choose to come here, it is predominantly male, likely represents an age demographic of the majority being 40 plus, it is shooting based so very niche, etc.

 

It would be interesting to see a demographic make up relative to age, ethnicity, disposable income, job type, location, etc, but not so interesting I could be bothered creating a poll.

 

The good thing though is that it does indicate slightly right of centre which is reassuring, we are a forum community of realists and not idealistic dreamers, even the kippers...... ;)

 

As Winston Churchill is reputed to have said 'if a man in his 20's is not a liberal then he has no heart and when in his 40's if he is not a conservative then he has no brain' or something very similar. He probably didn't really say that, but he should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum would never be representative for a poll of wider society, it is elective in that we choose to come here, it is predominantly male, likely represents an age demographic of the majority being 40 plus, it is shooting based so very niche, etc.

 

It would be interesting to see a demographic make up relative to age, ethnicity, disposable income, job type, location

Obviously an interest forum will rarely be a societal cross-section, but my point was that if you surveyed white men over 40 who live in rural Conservative constituencies, Labour would still get (a lot) more than 4%.

 

A previous poster's suggestion that shooters are specifically worries that Labour would restrict shooting makes more sense; though it's not something many posters have mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously an interest forum will rarely be a societal cross-section, but my point was that if you surveyed white men over 40 who live in rural Conservative constituencies, Labour would still get (a lot) more than 4%.

A previous poster's suggestion that shooters are specifically worries that Labour would restrict shooting makes more sense; though it's not something many posters have mentioned.

I agree, it is heavily skewed. I think all being shooters is a big part of the reason, Labour are traditionally anti country sports as they see the countryside as the playground of the wealthy, at least their core support which is predominantly industrial high population density see it that way. Shooting would become more expensive.

 

They are also pro legislation which most shooters don't like, even although conservatives have put more shooting legislation in place, they are less legislative than Labour.

 

I also like to think that shooters demonstrate good wisdom :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get this Labour=workers thinking. I have worked since leaving school at 16. I was educated at a local comprehensive. I have got where I am today through hard work, honesty and common sense. In my opinion if you want to better yourself you vote conservative. If you want to live off of somebody else's hard work then you vote labour. voting ukip means you are a frustrated Conservative. Lib Dems/greens means your medication needs increasing.

Sums it up well I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...