Jump to content

Thoughts on a Second Wave! Then a Second Lockdown.


TIGHTCHOKE
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, treetree said:

Interesting figures, but what makes a 'case'? Presumably it is a positive test, but what number of those cases did the individual have no, or mild, or moderate symptoms?

Both mine and your figures can be correct here; the question is whether we are going to continue putting local areas into lockdown when the number of people needing hospital treatment is so small.

Clearly we are seeing a lot less deaths now than earlier in the crisis. Is this because the virus is less dangerous, is it because it’s summer or simply that a lot of the most vulnerable have already died? The government are obviously  paranoid over the number of cases but as you say should they be looking at deaths rather than cases. We aren’t the only ones doing so though. The new lockdown in Victoria, Australia was due to 6 deaths, 2 over 70’s, 2 over 80’s and 2 over 90’s!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Did anyone see the program in the week with Dr Xand and his twin Chris in the week?

41 years old, fit and healthy but he's being affected by Covid, having to have his heart stopped,  it's not all about deaths, cases are rising in the under 30s, probably because they are back out in the pubs?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AVB said:

We aren’t the only ones doing so though. The new lockdown in Victoria, Australia was due to 6 deaths, 2 over 70’s, 2 over 80’s and 2 over 90’s!

Watch the Aus police press conference if you haven't done do already (might be Melbourne). A frightening mentality, choice of language and almost relish at the prospect of trampling all over personal freedoms and civil liberties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mice! said:

Did anyone see the program in the week with Dr Xand and his twin Chris in the week?

41 years old, fit and healthy but he's being affected by Covid, having to have his heart stopped,  it's not all about deaths, cases are rising in the under 30s, probably because they are back out in the pubs?

 

Cases may be rising in that age group but deaths are not and looking at the third world countries with young populations, deaths are a magnitude or two lower per million compared to the UK as it is clear that a young healthy immune system is more than capable of fighting the virus successfully when acquired through normal infection routes (this does not include working 8 hour shifts with covid patients where virus burden in environment would be artificially high)

 

Using a 1 in a 10,000 to a 1 in a 100,000 example is not reflective of the fact that 9,999 to 99,999 in a 10,000 to 1,00,000 respectively have no issues with their immune system beating the virus and being asymptomatic or only showing mild symptoms.

 

As the doctors are identical twins, which itself is a high risk of genetic anomalies and which may be undiagnosed until a stressor occurs whilst they may have appeared fit and healthy, they are also not representative of the general population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AVB said:

Clearly we are seeing a lot less deaths now than earlier in the crisis. Is this because the virus is less dangerous, is it because it’s summer or simply that a lot of the most vulnerable have already died?

We will only find out definitely in 12 months time once we can look back at figures, but if the extra deaths have just pulled natural mortality forward a few months and we have less deaths later in the year the virus will not have any significance at a population level and will simply take its place among all the other risks if death.

I would suspect the latter for everyone who did not shield adequately made up the majority of deaths to date and that any second wave will involve those who did shield early and kept it up, now aquiring the virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely what we are seeing is just the same outbreak ,it was suppressed by strict lockdown ,which arrested it`s progression but it has now been allowed to gain strength due to the easing of the measures.I see it all as one wave which is being managed to try and keep the numbers of casualties acceptable to the howling media,thus keeping the heat off the politicians.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting, the Worldometer projection says we could end up with 1000 deaths a day by November if we dont keep active measures.
But based on what ? A slight incline in *** cases , most likely caused by extra testing ?
Deaths are still declining , and the practice of making everything a coro death 'if at all possible' continues...

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-cases-in-england-arent-rising-heres-why/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, according to the ONS, the number of deaths for week 31 was below the 5 year average. This is the 7th week in a row that the number of deaths has been lower than average. Which reinforces the view that the increase in CV-19 deaths early in the year was just an acceleration of them death of people who would have died relatively soon anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20200813_220018.jpg.50860168ee1de7bfd35617017e63ffad.jpg

20200813_220037.jpg.3e8311cdd1aaaca60e1d356f1aa9e1f5.jpg

Well something stinks, to me it sounds like they don't want a Northwest lockdown so are just keeping quiet.

Blackpool was rammed last weekend,  Morecambe was apparently busy, the Lakes were busy, people are getting out and about enjoying themselves.

But at what cost? Has it been decided that the economy has to get going again? I can agree with that but not if it's going to lead us back to a full blown lockdown,  pubs full, people not social distancing. 

Thankfully were getting tested each week at work now, I don't expect I'm going to pick it up unless it's from someone who has been in the pub all weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to local news, a pub in town which had to close a few weeks ago due to an outbreak, was totally due to a young lass who had tested positive but gone out with her mates regardless! Needless to say, she infected them  and a few others besides, and that was that. 
Pub has now reopened but the landlord says it cost her thousands in lost trade and deep cleaning etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scully said:

According to local news, a pub in town which had to close a few weeks ago due to an outbreak, was totally due to a young lass who had tested positive but gone out with her mates regardless! Needless to say, she infected them  and a few others besides, and that was that. 
Pub has now reopened but the landlord says it cost her thousands in lost trade and deep cleaning etc. 

If true, the landlord should sue (along with those infected), for loss of earnings.

Maybe there should be some criminal charges brought as well, maybe reckless endangerment, or something along those lines.

Edited by Newbie to this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/08/2020 at 11:23, Rewulf said:

This is interesting, the Worldometer projection says we could end up with 1000 deaths a day by November if we dont keep active measures.
But based on what ? A slight incline in *** cases , most likely caused by extra testing ?
Deaths are still declining , and the practice of making everything a coro death 'if at all possible' continues...

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-cases-in-england-arent-rising-heres-why/

Worldometer is one of the most respected data collection websites going. Possibly the most respected. If they predict it I will believe it is possible

Also the substance of the story that anybody who has ever tested positive for covid will be recorded as a covid death when they die irrespective of cause has largely been discredited. They can find no evidence that it was ever a directive or a policy. It may have been a practice adopted by doctors but it never was and never will be official policy.

In the news today Matt Hancock has allegedly axed Public Heath England for incompetence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

If true, the landlord should sue (along with those infected), for loss of earnings.

Maybe there should be some criminal charges brought as well, maybe reckless engagement, or something along those lines.

But there has to be proof that ‘she’ was the one who infected them! It could be reasoned that there was also someone else there with/without symptoms, it’s one of those things that can’t be proven 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

If true, the landlord should sue (along with those infected), for loss of earnings.

Maybe there should be some criminal charges brought as well, maybe reckless engagement, or something along those lines.

I doubt the landlord knows who she is. I wouldn’t think identification of responsible individuals will be made public knowledge from any official source. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vince Green said:

 

Also the substance of the story that anybody who has ever tested positive for covid will be recorded as a covid death when they die irrespective of cause has largely been discredited. They can find no evidence that it was ever a directive or a policy. It may have been a practice adopted by doctors but it never was and never will be official policy.

In the news today Matt Hancock has allegedly axed Public Heath England for incompetence

It was PHE policy to count all deaths of people who had ever tested positive as Covid deaths. This is why they are now publishing three sets of stats - total, within 60 days of test and within 28 days. One of the reasons that PHE is being scrapped. 
 

https://publichealthmatters.blog.gov.uk/2020/08/12/behind-the-headlines-counting-covid-19-deaths/

Edited by AVB
Added link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/06/2020 at 15:49, The Heron said:

The worst offenders are the ones that should be the most carful the ones over 70 don't seem to have any idea of how contagious this Covid 19 is and carry on with no regard for anyone else's safety. 

SOME OF US DO FRIEND,  ITS THE YOUNGER END WHO DON'T GIVE A TOSS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...