ditchman Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 been watching Packhams latest upcoming on TV...........he is exploring with an eco terrorist...that the time for verbal action is coming to an end ...and direct physical action is needed in the form of bombing pipelines etc..... we will have to watch the programme to find out how deep it is going........... This is very close to INSIGHTMENT ...and maybe put ideas into other nutters........almost similar to what Trump did for Capitol Hill............i wonder if there is a legal case here to take him down any views ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 Strange he didn't like the direct action of hanging dead birds on his gate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eggy74 Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 Setting out a blueprint for his disciples ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 16 minutes ago, ditchman said: been watching Packhams latest upcoming on TV...........he is exploring with an eco terrorist...that the time for verbal action is coming to an end ...and direct physical action is needed in the form of bombing pipelines etc..... we will have to watch the programme to find out how deep it is going........... This is very close to INSIGHTMENT ...and maybe put ideas into other nutters........almost similar to what Trump did for Capitol Hill............i wonder if there is a legal case here to take him down any views ? Says exactly the opposite in The Times extract I’ve just read? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
team tractor Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 I watched a clip and started laughing at his own unfolding . What an idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jall25 Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 27 minutes ago, ditchman said: been watching Packhams latest upcoming on TV...........he is exploring with an eco terrorist...that the time for verbal action is coming to an end ...and direct physical action is needed in the form of bombing pipelines etc..... we will have to watch the programme to find out how deep it is going........... This is very close to INSIGHTMENT ...and maybe put ideas into other nutters........almost similar to what Trump did for Capitol Hill............i wonder if there is a legal case here to take him down any views ? I have complained about some of the content on his Instagram site where people post all sorts of abuse and threats - i complained to Instagram and RSPB Just now, jall25 said: I have complained about some of the content on his Instagram site where people post all sorts of abuse and threats - i complained to Instagram and RSPB and the BBC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted September 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 18 minutes ago, Scully said: Says exactly the opposite in The Times extract I’ve just read? interesting !!!!!!................my post came from the man himeself...on a PTC advertising the up and coming documentory................and you say the Times has a totally different take on it...? 34 minutes ago, eggy74 said: Setting out a blueprint for his disciples ? you are right.............i red it as giving liecence to the nutters as you confirm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billytheghillie Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 Dont worry about him, works for the Beeb, they will turn a blind eye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun4860 Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 On 17/09/2023 at 21:46, billytheghillie said: Dont worry about him, works for the Beeb, they will turn a blind eye. Ah but I don’t think this is on the beeb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centrepin Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 Poke Packham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discobob Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 shall we do a club-together and get Packham a subscription to a couple of fieldsport publications.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wymondley Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 If we want rid of him, all it needs is for someone to come forward and say he sexually abused them 15 years ago...Apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discobob Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 6 minutes ago, Wymondley said: If we want rid of him, all it needs is for someone to come forward and say he sexually abused them 15 years ago...Apparently. well - he touched my iguana inappropriately on a school visit!!! Will that do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 27 minutes ago, discobob said: well - he touched my iguana inappropriately on a school visit!!! Will that do Just see the headlines on the Sun.......... Packham Looshed My LIZARD BBC say it was all above board............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratlegs Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 Be careful what you print, he is suing Field sports channel for liable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centrepin Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 hour ago, Wymondley said: If we want rid of him, all it needs is for someone to come forward and say he sexually abused them 15 years ago...Apparently. Animals apparently can't speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 Hello, if he advocating breaking the law like a climate activist eg direct action that could well be his down fall 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 The thing is, once you start breaking the law because you don’t approve of the way things are done, then where do you stop? There are already instances of folk letting down tyres of metropolitan 4x4’s, and pouring milk over displays in some shops because they don’t agree with how some people live. It’s a slippery slope when you start to interfere illegally in the lives of others because you don’t agree with what they do. Not everyone agrees with the science; indeed not all scientists do, but once you interfere in someone’s freedom of choice to live the way they choose then you’re heading down the path of religion, where the voices of differing opinions are drowned out and not tolerated, dissenters are ridiculed and insulted, and if anarchy rules, then we’re back to the first point I raised…where does it stop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 hour ago, Scully said: The thing is, once you start breaking the law because you don’t approve of the way things are done, then where do you stop? There are already instances of folk letting down tyres of metropolitan 4x4’s, and pouring milk over displays in some shops because they don’t agree with how some people live. It’s a slippery slope when you start to interfere illegally in the lives of others because you don’t agree with what they do. Not everyone agrees with the science; indeed not all scientists do, but once you interfere in someone’s freedom of choice to live the way they choose then you’re heading down the path of religion, where the voices of differing opinions are drowned out and not tolerated, dissenters are ridiculed and insulted, and if anarchy rules, then we’re back to the first point I raised…where does it stop? i understand that........but in the PTC...(piece to camera with eco terrorist)......he is not talking about letting tyres down or pouring milk over shop displays......he is exploring the possibility of activly BOMBING A PIPELINE and the repercussions he would suffer as a result of getting caught................ now this is only a clip of the forcoming programme.............but in my mind ...for all those misguided folk out there ...that is rubber stamping serious TERROISM.....and i cant understand why he hasnt been arrested for just those few moments /words Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted September 19, 2023 Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 3 hours ago, ditchman said: i understand that........but in the PTC...(piece to camera with eco terrorist)......he is not talking about letting tyres down or pouring milk over shop displays......he is exploring the possibility of activly BOMBING A PIPELINE and the repercussions he would suffer as a result of getting caught................ now this is only a clip of the forcoming programme.............but in my mind ...for all those misguided folk out there ...that is rubber stamping serious TERROISM.....and i cant understand why he hasnt been arrested for just those few moments /words As far as I’m aware he hasn’t actually condoned or suggested anyone should blow up a pipeline, and he has stated that if he went to prison he would lose his voice. Saying that, I’m not aware he has condemned such acts either, but that isn’t against the law and neither is simply having a debate about such things. Admittedly he’s sailing close to the wind, and I genuinely wish he would cross that line, but he’s not daft. He’s a hypocrite, but not daft. I agree, any such act of actually blowing up a pipeline would be terrorism, but in my opinion so is vandalising a shop display and vandalising someone’s private property because they act in ways you disagree with or won’t abide by your wishes and/or beliefs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 hour ago, Scully said: As far as I’m aware he hasn’t actually condoned or suggested anyone should blow up a pipeline, and he has stated that if he went to prison he would lose his voice. Saying that, I’m not aware he has condemned such acts either, but that isn’t against the law and neither is simply having a debate about such things. Admittedly he’s sailing close to the wind, and I genuinely wish he would cross that line, but he’s not daft. He’s a hypocrite, but not daft. I agree, any such act of actually blowing up a pipeline would be terrorism, but in my opinion so is vandalising a shop display and vandalising someone’s private property because they act in ways you disagree with or won’t abide by your wishes and/or beliefs. i shall keep an eye out when the programme is aired......its one programme with Packham in that i will watch............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 20, 2023 Report Share Posted September 20, 2023 Hello, will anyone on PW be watching tonight 🤔, he advocates breaking the law but will he be on the front line 🤔 16 hours ago, ditchman said: i shall keep an eye out when the programme is aired......its one programme with Packham in that i will watch............. On tonight Simon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted September 20, 2023 Report Share Posted September 20, 2023 I would think that if he had advocated bombing pipelines then it would be all over the media, and it isn’t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsbob Posted September 20, 2023 Report Share Posted September 20, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Scully said: I would think that if he had advocated bombing pipelines then it would be all over the media, and it isn’t. It is , the wife saw it on tv this morning and a quick search came up with this. https://duckduckgo.com/?hps=1&q=bbc+packham+pipeline&ia=web Edited September 20, 2023 by sportsbob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted September 20, 2023 Report Share Posted September 20, 2023 20 hours ago, Scully said: Admittedly he’s sailing close to the wind, and I genuinely wish he would cross that line, but he’s not daft. He’s a hypocrite, but not daft. What you say above is very much backed up here https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12539197/BBC-Springwatch-presenter-Chris-Packham-says-ethically-responsible-climate-change-protesters-break-law-warns-oil-refinery-blown-soon.html where (allegedly) he suggests escalations and moots that may even involve 'blowing up' an oil refinery. 'At the moment, no one is blowing up an oil refinery, but a lot of people think that is very likely to happen.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.