redial Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 That’s got your attention. I usually keep a bottle in the house, just talking about blended rather than malt. I have noticed that most of the supermarkets stock Bells / Grouse and their own label. Does anyone ever see the older offerings I remember from the late 60’s /70’s, Long John, Haig, Black & White etc. Cheers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen-H Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 I was born in 91 so can't really comment on what was the standard whiskey in the pubs or off licence but surely jamesons? Whyte & mackay? Haig? Gold label The yanks brew ( Jim bean , Jack daniels ) both I wouldn't go near personally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hitman Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 38 minutes ago, redial said: That’s got your attention. I usually keep a bottle in the house, just talking about blended rather than malt. I have noticed that most of the supermarkets stock Bells / Grouse and their own label. Does anyone ever see the older offerings I remember from the late 60’s /70’s, Long John, Haig, Black & White etc. Cheers. Yes -most you have mentioned are available, but perhaps not on all supermarket shelves. If you are a blended whiskey drinker - then can I suggest Johnny Walker black label - £20 in most regular places. Its a beautiful whiskey- just add water to your own taste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fargo Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 Harrods markets some nice whiskey and I bought a good single malt a few weeks ago for £34 + postage from them which wasn’t available on most shelves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enfieldspares Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 (edited) Johnny Walker Red Label became "export only" as likely, or disappeared, did Cutty Sark as also disappeared did Booth's gin. The two have now had the names revived. Things come and go. Watney's Red Barrel anyone? Whitbread Tankard? Edited February 22 by enfieldspares Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redial Posted February 22 Author Report Share Posted February 22 Cutty Sark, I remember that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 5 hours ago, redial said: Cutty Sark, I remember that one. Cutty Sark had a strong connection with the London wine merchants, Berry Bros, and Rudd. History here; https://blog.bbr.com/2010/02/09/farewell-to-cutty-sark/ White Horse was my personal favourite of the 'non premium' blends as it had a lot of Islay whiskies in the blend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miki Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 11 hours ago, redial said: That’s got your attention. I usually keep a bottle in the house, just talking about blended rather than malt. Don't confuse Blended Scotch Whisky with a Single Malt. Blended is typically less than 20% Malt Whisky (of 3 years or more old) with the rest being Grain Spirit (as used to make Gin and Vodka etc) which was made a few days before it was bottled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbob Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 When the daughter was at Inverurie there was a nice small whisky shop there always loved popping in and seeing the prices on the different bottles and the cigars and thought how the other half lived Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobba Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 To my pallet Ballantines Whisky is a smooth blended whisky, although I do keep my eye on Tesco’s offers on malt whiskies. 3 hours ago, JohnfromUK said: White Horse was my personal favourite of the 'non premium' blends as it had a lot of Islay whiskies in the blend. A White Horse trotted into a pub and asked for a large whisky. The barmen said we’ve a whisky named after you. The horse replied “ What? Dobbin?” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redial Posted February 23 Author Report Share Posted February 23 4 hours ago, miki said: Don't confuse Blended Scotch Whisky with a Single Malt. Blended is typically less than 20% Malt Whisky (of 3 years or more old) with the rest being Grain Spirit (as used to make Gin and Vodka etc) which was made a few days before it was bottled. That’s interesting, thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 16 hours ago, the hitman said: Yes -most you have mentioned are available, but perhaps not on all supermarket shelves. If you are a blended whiskey drinker - then can I suggest Johnny Walker black label - £20 in most regular places. Its a beautiful whiskey- just add water to your own taste. It's a Whisky if Scottish and a Whiskey if Irish or yank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ph5172 Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 I remember when drinking Jack Daniel was all the rage in club land. got absolutely trollied on it one night and have never drunk it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Best Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 Just now, ph5172 said: got absolutely trollied on it one night and have never drunk it again. Plus one........1980. Not touched it since. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 whisky.looks loverly.............tastes like rusty water ...awful stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesj Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 I some times wish I could tell one from another as I've got a couple of bottles that should be good. A Lagavulin 16 year old single malt and a bottle of 1970's Haig Dimple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 (edited) 25 minutes ago, bluesj said: I some times wish I could tell one from another as I've got a couple of bottles that should be good. A Lagavulin 16 year old single malt and a bottle of 1970's Haig Dimple. Lagavulin is a very distinctive whisky - and something of a 'Marmite' character in that it is loved by some and hated by others as it is an Islay and VERY pronounced Islay with strong 'seaweed' characteristics. Almost anyone would easily distinguish Lagavulin from most other whiskies as it is very individual. The Dimple Haig is (I think) a blend - albeit a 'delux' blend. It's not one I know at all. Whilst it will be quite unusual having survived un-drunk in bottle 50 years, in fact whisky doesn't improve after it is bottled. The 16 years on the Lagavulin is the maturation time in the cask, when it does change and mature, but once bottled it is effectively 'frozen' in maturation as at the day of bottling. Edited February 23 by JohnfromUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miki Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 1 hour ago, ditchman said: whisky.looks loverly.............tastes like rusty water ...awful stuff You just haven't found the right one yet... Have you tried a Dailuaine, Blair Athol or Benrinnes ? Perhaps a heavily charred barrel offering like the GlenScotia Victoriana or the Royal Lochnagar ? Maybe a smokey and peated Longrow from Springbank or the Ledaig 18 from Tobermory.? 3 distinct groups there with smilarities but so so different. None of those taste like rusty water, they are all single Malt Whiskies. The sharp metalic flavours come from the grain spirit used in Blended Scotch and i'd agree that most of those taste nothing like a real, aged Whisky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 if you get hold of or find a old or strange whisky.....DONT OPEN IT.........go online and find out how much it is worth....some of these bottles go for very serious money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miki Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 Whisky is for drinking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 37 minutes ago, miki said: Whisky is for drinking not over a £1000/bottle......and up to £90,000/bottle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amateur Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 51 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said: .... Whilst it will be quite unusual having survived un-drunk in bottle 50 years, in fact whisky doesn't improve ..... In the 1990s my tee-total father-in-law gave me a bottle of Haig that he had kept since before WW2. It went down very well, certainly smoother than the usual Scotch that I drank then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miki Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 13 hours ago, ditchman said: not over a £1000/bottle......and up to £90,000/bottle Yes, I wouldn't buy a bottle that was that expensive but if someone gave it to me i'd open it and have a taste. In my experience a lot of the old and rare whiskies aren't that good, similar to the majority of 6 to 8 year olds, they are sharp and loose flavour quickly. Rare (there isn't much of it left) and old (it's been maturing in a barrel for 45 years) are two different things. If you ever get to Glenfarclas the 10 is good, the 12 a bit better, the 15 better still, more flavour and longer tasting, the 25 is excellent (IMO) as it reaches its peak, the 30 isn't a lot better, certainly (again IMO) not worth £750 (£550 more than the 25). In Aberlour there is a pub called the Mash Tun. They have Glenfarclas whiskies going back to before the 2nd World War, pick your birth year and have a dram. The 1957 was around £1000 a nip if I recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 43 minutes ago, miki said: In my experience a lot of the old and rare whiskies aren't that good I don't have experience of whiskies, but the same applies to wines. I have been lucky enough to taste some old and rare wines. Some are delicious, and some are probably best described as 'past their best'. High prices are paid for older bottles, and you may get lucky, you may be disappointed. I sampled (in the last 12 months) side by side two Bordeaux wines from 1961, a very good year and now over 60 years old. One bottle was very good - though once opened needed drinking quickly as it soon lost its qualities, the other was dull and lacked any appeal. To our surprise, the 'good' bottle was a modest relatively ordinary Bordeaux Chateau, whereas the 'poor' bottle was a 'higher end' known name and should have been much the better. There is huge variability; some wines from the 1990s are a disappointment now, whereas some from the 1960s are still lovely. Three things stand out (from quite a few 'trials'), You can't rely on a 'famous name or year' still being good Some less well known names and less 'premium' years can be very good indeed Open and drink immediately; old wines oxidise and degrade quickly after opening and can be markedly poorer in under an hour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 45 minutes ago, JohnfromUK said: I don't have experience of whiskies, but the same applies to wines. I have been lucky enough to taste some old and rare wines. Some are delicious, and some are probably best described as 'past their best'. High prices are paid for older bottles, and you may get lucky, you may be disappointed. I sampled (in the last 12 months) side by side two Bordeaux wines from 1961, a very good year and now over 60 years old. One bottle was very good - though once opened needed drinking quickly as it soon lost its qualities, the other was dull and lacked any appeal. To our surprise, the 'good' bottle was a modest relatively ordinary Bordeaux Chateau, whereas the 'poor' bottle was a 'higher end' known name and should have been much the better. There is huge variability; some wines from the 1990s are a disappointment now, whereas some from the 1960s are still lovely. Three things stand out (from quite a few 'trials'), You can't rely on a 'famous name or year' still being good Some less well known names and less 'premium' years can be very good indeed Open and drink immediately; old wines oxidise and degrade quickly after opening and can be markedly poorer in under an hour. many years ago i was given a bottle of Mouton - Rothschild....it was an 80's vintage....it was supreme.......the next day i rang Peatling & caldring and asked if they had any in of that year...they said they were sold out but had some of the next year...so i nipped down and and bought 4 bottles.... they were awful........😭 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.