Jump to content

Just wondering ......................


Jega
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Jega said:

Just wondering when this incompetent government are going to start to "SMASH " the people smuggling gangs that are responsible for these tragedys

The day a squadron of pigs are seen flying over Downing Street.   They are not going to stop all those future lieboor voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How , reaĺistically, is the government ever going to smash gangs located in places in Albania and West Africa or Eritrea?  It's just never going to happen as long as those who make it to these shores are allowed to stay?

The only way to stop them coming is the absolute certainty that their feet will barely touch British soil before they get deported again. No ifs, no buts, no maybes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TIGHTCHOKE said:

Just heard about this on the radio news.

Did the French rescue them?

Did they take them back to France?

What the **** is going on?

i believe a french naval cutter escorted them over the line to UK territory..........(i think you will have to check and confirm)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never forget they ditched the Rwanda scheme practically the first day they got into power. And before they got into power they did everything they could to obstruct and delay it.

They think we are like sheep and will soon forget these things.

And yes to the other question, the French took the dead and injured off the boat and let the rest carry on with their crossing having radioed the British coastguard to pick them up.

That tells you everything you need to know about what the French are about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Vince Green said:

How , reaĺistically, is the government ever going to smash gangs located in places in Albania and West Africa or Eritrea?  It's just never going to happen as long as those who make it to these shores are allowed to stay?

The only way to stop them coming is the absolute certainty that their feet will barely touch British soil before they get deported again. No ifs, no buts, no maybes.

We probably have the means to scare the traffickers witless but lack the willingness or gonads to give the green light?

Like or lump her. Thatcher would have sorted it long ago?

7 hours ago, Mr.C said:

And the previous govt. were doing so well at stopping them too, such a sham(e) 

All the while there's money to be made it'll continue. 

Where is all of the money ending up one might consider?

1 hour ago, Old Boggy said:

973 crossings yesterday. The largest in two years.

Starmer really knows how to `smash the gangs`.

Boils my blood.

OB

He's just having a rest maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ditchman said:

26,000 this year so far:mad:

There will be more of 'them' here soon than pensioners in need ! I wonder who the government will look after first ?! 🤔 🤬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's little wonder theres billions of pounds worth of blackhole when there's that level of illegal immigrants coming in. 1000 in one day, multiply 1k a days rent, 1k x mouths to feed, police, education for future kids, hospital treatment, dentists, space on the roads, suppression of wages ect, ect, ect. 

The vast majority of it won't be measured, but just imagine the real world and full cost of all that, just for one day and then think of what the other 364 days will bring. 

What does Kier do, smashes the pensioners, this country is ****ed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently over 745,000 are now in the UK "awaiting asylum".  That is 1% of our population.  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13931281/Britain-illegal-migrant-capital-Europe-Shock-new-study-shows-745-000-asylum-seekers-country-accounting-one-cent-total-population.html

The Gov't never had any plan, method or means to "smash the gangs".    That was an outright lie, told simply to win the election.  As others have said above, the 'gangs' exist, operate and thrive outside our jurisdiction - and very probably keep the local officials where they operate 'on side' with bribes.

In my view the only real long term solution will be to make it very clear those arriving illegally won't (ever) be allowed to stay or receive a generous, comfortable reception - which is what the smuggling gangs tell them whilst taking their money.  The Rwanda scheme was a tiny step that never got beyond planning because (in my view) those UK public bodies charged with operating it - didn't operate it - mainly due to our chronically bad record of them actually doing what the Gov't (and the majority of the UK general public) wants.  However, it was a (very small) step towards making the UK a less attractive destination.

This is going to get a lot worse because other countries who were previously welcoming (e.g. Germany) are having second thoughts on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vmaxphil said:

If when they started coming over the government rounded them up, put them in secure facilities then let it be known that they would be there for 2 years before being assessed, it would have stopped it overnight 

But that would be against their human rights 🤦‍♂️🙄 We, the public, can keep talking about this and making sensible suggestions, but,,,,, the government aren't listening !!! 🤬😠

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 12gauge82 said:

It's little wonder theres billions of pounds worth of blackhole when there's that level of illegal immigrants coming in. 1000 in one day, multiply 1k a days rent, 1k x mouths to feed, police, education for future kids, hospital treatment, dentists, space on the roads, suppression of wages ect, ect, ect. 

The vast majority of it won't be measured, but just imagine the real world and full cost of all that, just for one day and then think of what the other 364 days will bring. 

What does Kier do, smashes the pensioners, this country is ******. 

The only thing of interest to many hogs irrespective of tint is the overflowing trough and the ramp up to it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, old man said:

The only thing of interest to many hogs irrespective of tint is the overflowing trough and the ramp up to it?

 

It would also seem that ,given recent disclosures,  the biggest pigs are not the politicos but the upper ranks of the 'so called' civil service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yellow Bear said:

It would also seem that ,given recent disclosures,  the biggest pigs are not the politicos but the upper ranks of the 'so called' civil service.

Mm, seemingly they are all allowed ample immunit/cover for their activities? Very easy to spend someone else's money funding playtime?

I suppose that a restful weekend was had looking at the accumulation of freebies?

Edited by old man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...