Jump to content

Channel Migrants


ditchman
 Share

Recommended Posts

As Farage says this is the unseen UK cost of illegal immigration and will only cause more resent .What would happen if i went to France posted my passport back here then went down to the beach and jumped into a dinghy and sailed over the same way got *rescued* could i not get the same treatment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

4 hours ago, Newbie to this said:

 

I was replying to the above coment from Rewulf. Stating that these people crossing the Channel and entering the UK illegally, are in fact, sinners. Law breaking is a sin right, it's been a while since I've been to confession?

What on earth are you going on about, do you mean from a Christian (RC) perspective or British law?

No I don't see any correlation. Are you really suggesting that a defence for their law breaking is, people speed. 

You are having a laugh or are really out of your depth, you seem to be saying that because of their entry to the UK is in your opinion illegal they are sinners and if I point out that speeding is illegal and therefore in your opinion a sin and you cannot see the similarities?

Does the same logic apply to murderers, rapists etc 🤔 

Having a laugh then?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, armsid said:

As Farage says this is the unseen UK cost of illegal immigration and will only cause more resentment .What would happen if i went to France posted my passport back here then went down to the beach and jumped into a dinghy and sailed over the same way got *rescued* (why would you be rescued in a sailing dinghy on the way back to your country of origin?) could i not get the same treatment? (sent to Rwanda? )

Critical thinking has left the building this evening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, henry d said:

What on earth are you going on about, do you mean from a Christian (RC) perspective or British law?

I don't believe the law refers to breaches as sin.

9 hours ago, henry d said:

You are having a laugh or are really out of your depth, you seem to be saying that because of their entry to the UK is in your opinion illegal they are sinners and if I point out that speeding is illegal and therefore in your opinion a sin and you cannot see the similarities?

No I cannot see any correlation, or any relevance in comparing the two.

Just for the record I don't classs them (illegal immigrants) as sinners, merely as law breakers, and as such they should be deported immediately, not put up in hotels at the tax payer's expense.

People speeding does not justify their law breaking entry into our country. If you wasn't suggesting it does, then what was your point in pointing out speeding is also against the law? Whataboutery?

9 hours ago, henry d said:

Does the same logic apply to murderers, rapists etc 🤔 

Having a laugh then?

So if you were trying to justify their law breaking, by pointing out that speeding is also against the law. Does that justification also apply to murderers, rapist etc. or not?

Edited by Newbie to this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, henry d said:

No, I work or have worked with all those groups and a few more from a third sector perspective as they are underfunded and have been underfunded for years. 

We don't have one single queue, we don't put one person in front of another, we deal with things in groups or sets if you prefer so most people will be subsets of others and are dealt with in those groups. So your question is just ridiculous. 

Really, was it that hard?

You are pointing out that you believe law breaking is a sin and I believe you mean migrants, yet if I ask if you break speeding laws you don't see the connection?

Your answer is nonsense. These groups are made up of individuals and the reason they are in your groups is because they can't get one to one treatment. You make as much sense as the Just Stop Oil lunatics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Newbie to this said:

Just for the record I don't classs them (illegal immigrants) as sinners, merely as law breakers, and as such they should be deported immediately, not put up in hotels at the tax payer's expense.

I reckon a lot of them get straight off the dinghy and into employment with G4S.
Has anyone noticed the amount of people of African origin working as security guards in supermarkets , job centres and government buildings, who barely speak a word of English ?
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Newbie to this said:

Perhaps it's just we don't recognise their skills, so they have to take low skill work. 

It would be funny if they didnt have any other documentation, except their medical degree certs, or their engineering diplomas ?
I suspect the only qualifications  a lot of them have , is that their country of origin has them on a criminal wanted list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/11/2022 at 12:48, oowee said:

Nothing wrong with that at all but you have to have a plan (we dont) and you have to pay for it (we can't). We had more power, more money and more influence in than out. 

Simply put the cost is equivalent to 4p on the basic rate of tax. The tax hikes we will see tomorrow need not happen. 

The honors list is  historica patronage that should either be re purposed or abolished. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/11/2022 at 12:48, oowee said:

Nothing wrong with that at all but you have to have a plan (we dont) and you have to pay for it (we can't). We had more power, more money and more influence in than out. 

Simply put the cost is equivalent to 4p on the basic rate of tax. The tax hikes we will see tomorrow need not happen. 

The honors list is  historica patronage that should either be re purposed or abolished. 

Have to agree and sadly by design we are unable to change it. We have by design also given away everything of any value, leaving the dross to elevate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rewulf said:

I reckon a lot of them get straight off the dinghy and into employment with G4S.
Has anyone noticed the amount of people of African origin working as security guards in supermarkets , job centres and government buildings, who barely speak a word of English ?
 

 

Coduct likely to cause a breach of the peace as was once known. Now a Public Order Act arrestable offence. Any sensible, old school, police officer would arrest the moron that has made this video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, an Asylum seeker accused of raping a young boy, was released by Police in East London and later found in a Hotel in Bucks where children are also staying. He was released previousley on bail and ordered to return in January, after inquiries had been made, and banned from the Waltham Forest area where the rape took place. Absolutely unbelievable, do they think him only capable of rape in one particular place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/11/2022 at 10:09, Dave-G said:

Would that mean you support those mostly prime of life military age males not even attempting to hide their gradually growing enclaves and gangs to install their sharia law against women here. Some of us do in fact look and see what is happening because so few of them are bringing their wives and children ....yet.

Nope, what I meant was that there is a reason for gay people to get away and seek asylum in a tolerant country and that it is not something that is easily shared with anyone until they think they are safe.

/Markus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nuke said:

Nope, what I meant was that there is a reason for gay people to get away and seek asylum in a tolerant country and that it is not something that is easily shared with anyone until they think they are safe.

/Markus

Funnily enough, most people don’t want them here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, henry d said:

.

Really?

"But these people are with sin..."

Yes really.

On 17/11/2022 at 09:02, Newbie to this said:

People speeding does not justify their law breaking entry into our country. If you wasn't suggesting it does, then what was your point in pointing out speeding is also against the law? Whataboutery?

On 16/11/2022 at 23:36, henry d said:

Does the same logic apply to murderers, rapists etc 🤔 

Having a laugh then?

So if you were trying to justify their law breaking, by pointing out that speeding is also against the law. Does that justification also apply to murderers, rapist etc. or not?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Newbie to this said:

Yes really.

 

As usual, Henry has lost the debate by your logical reasoning and talking his shallow responses through to a sensible conclusion, he will now likely ignore you as he has realised you can't simply be silenced by posting a hollow argument like "that's racist" or "critical thinking has left the building". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DM headline news item today.

An illegal Albanian migrant (left) deported after paying £3,500 to be smuggled into the UK by small boat has urged others not to follow in his footsteps. The man - who is only known as Artan - said he had paid criminals to get across the Channel (right) after borrowing the cash from friends and family. Artan, who describes himself as an 'economic migrant', described the journey (lower inset) as 'torture' and 'incredibly scary'.

Ah didums, do I care? Serves him right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Boybrit said:

DM headline news item today.

An illegal Albanian migrant (left) deported after paying £3,500 to be smuggled into the UK by small boat has urged others not to follow in his footsteps. The man - who is only known as Artan - said he had paid criminals to get across the Channel (right) after borrowing the cash from friends and family. Artan, who describes himself as an 'economic migrant', described the journey (lower inset) as 'torture' and 'incredibly scary'.

Ah didums, do I care? Serves him right.

At least he is honest and owns up to being an 'economic migrant' and not claiming asylum due to 'persecution' for religious/racial/lifestyle matters.  They should learn that to be an 'economic migrant' you have to follow the rules, apply in your country (at UK Embassy?) and follow the decisions - and you may well not win, but it won't cost you £3,500 or be 'incredibly scary', though I admit having to deal with our Civil Service may prove 'tedious'.

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...