Jump to content

Huw Edwards,,,


ditchman
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, amateur said:

He's pleaded guilty.

Now awaiting sentencing.

Probably get a slapped wrist.

Actually referred by the magistrate to the crown court for sentencing.

10 hours ago, Gordon R said:

If you received illegal content and reported it to the Police - nothing would happen to you. That is the law. If you kept it and didn't report it, there is the offence.

A qualified barrister below disagrees with you.

3 hours ago, stumfelter said:

Please enlighten me then...

Clear now?  If you turn up at a police station, waving your phone around, saying so-and-so sent me an image, you will be arrested, and wind up on the sex offenders register.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They are strict liability offences.

There are currently several people on the register who were under the age of 18 when their equally underage girlfriend sent them, unsolicited, a racey picture.

That is of course, morally, a world away, from Edwards' behaviour, but the law is an *** and doesn't allow for such distinctions when it comes to strict liability offences (though, sentences received differ).

@scolopax Edwards was sent several pictures over the course of months, it wasn't a one-off.  So even if you follow the @Gordon R take, that nothing would happen to you if you reported such to the police, it seems that wasn't what happened in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, scolopax said:

Contentious…but I think he has received a raw deal. 
 

from what I read he received porn from a third party for a period of time. He did not request or want anything Illegal, but because his source sent some underage stuff, among all the other legal porn, which H.E. did not want, but he received. Then an offence is committed. He did not ‘make’ any indecent images as we would think it, the term make an image under the legislation has a very broad meaning. 

So the Good Old BBC top newsreader didn't know it was wrong to receive child porn  when he had loads of images on his comp including 7 of the worst type 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, scolopax said:

Contentious…but I think he has received a raw deal. 
 

from what I read he received porn from a third party for a period of time. He did not request or want anything Illegal, but because his source sent some underage stuff, among all the other legal porn, which H.E. did not want, but he received. Then an offence is committed. He did not ‘make’ any indecent images as we would think it, the term make an image under the legislation has a very broad meaning. 

Nope! He should have used common sense and reported it?

18 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said:

Hello, The amount of money the BBC pay these people is totally obscene, evening rant over !!!!!!

Yep, just another pile to be sorted through?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, old man said:

Nope! He should have used common sense and reported it?

But he didn't and has another case coming up involving him paying a child for explicit images.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, udderlyoffroad said:

Actually referred by the magistrate to the crown court for sentencing.

A qualified barrister below disagrees with you.

Clear now?  If you turn up at a police station, waving your phone around, saying so-and-so sent me an image, you will be arrested, and wind up on the sex offenders register.

The good old bbb 😂 he states that you MAY be charged under the offences not that you WILL. If the images are genuinely unsolicited (which I doubt) therein lies a defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 31/07/2024 at 17:39, ditchman said:

still on gardening leave at nearly £500.000/year....and he is in court for having and asking for photos from a convicted peadophile.....

is the BBC going to ask for our money  back ?

the guy desperately needs a decent solicitor like Eventum legal otherwise he’s going down for a long long time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Rooey84 said:

the guy desperately needs a decent solicitor like Eventum legal otherwise he’s going down for a long long time 

i dont rekon he will do time............(not rolf harris enough)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, steve_b_wales said:

I did not like the sheer look of arrogance on his face when he was walking to the court.

He’s probably been told by his very expensive barrister that by pleading guilty asap, ‘only’ having 41 images (most of these paedophiles have hundreds), having mental health issues and being of previously good character his chances of a suspended sentence or community service is better than fair. 
Personally I think he ought to spend time behind bars, a couple of years at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Boristhedog said:

.........and being of previously good character..........

Or not having been rumbled in the past. It seems as though he has been seeking the company of young men for some while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything to do with child porn is simply repulsive. When I saw the news footage the other night of Huw arriving at court wearing shades with his head held high, not even a hint of shame, I felt anger beyond words can express.

I hope he gets what the other nonces get once he’s locked up…a good hiding!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/08/2024 at 20:04, Doormat said:

Anything to do with child porn is simply repulsive. When I saw the news footage the other night of Huw arriving at court wearing shades with his head held high, not even a hint of shame, I felt anger beyond words can express.

I hope he gets what the other nonces get once he’s locked up…a good hiding!!

Hear hear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...