Jump to content

Even A Blind Squirrel Sometimes Finds A Nut


Danger-Mouse
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's interesting to note that Delta Airlines hold a 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic.

I used to like him as I saw his entrepreneurial spirit, and go out there and do some really crazy stuff as a trailblazer, quite inspirational but am less keen these days.

Whilst I'm sure there is some truth in the fact that Branson himself and his holding companies don't pay or significantly minimise their UK tax contribution, it should be remembered nearly 10k people are employed by Virgin Atlantic in the UK and I'm pretty sure they all pay NI & tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

It's interesting to note that Delta Airlines hold a 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic.

I used to like him as I saw his entrepreneurial spirit, and go out there and do some really crazy stuff as a trailblazer, quite inspirational but am less keen these days.

Whilst I'm sure there is some truth in the fact that Branson himself and his holding companies don't pay or significantly minimise their UK tax contribution, it should be remembered nearly 10k people are employed by Virgin Atlantic in the UK and I'm pretty sure they all pay NI & tax.

I don’t think this was aimed at those that made/make him rich and in so doing, contribute to the country......I think it’s aimed at his personal lack of contribution to the country

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

 it should be remembered nearly 10k people are employed by Virgin Atlantic in the UK and I'm pretty sure they all pay NI & tax.

It should also be remembered that the man owns a space flight company. Why any government would pump money into it is beyond me  when shareholders (Branson 51%, and 7th richest person in the UK) and commercial lenders wont invest a penny.

If it is felt this does need to happen  to secure those jobs  then the equity ought to be handed over to the taxpayer.

I honestly thought the 2008 financial crash would have put an end to governments being compelled to act as private institutions were deemed "too big to fail"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

It's interesting to note that Delta Airlines hold a 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic.

I used to like him as I saw his entrepreneurial spirit, and go out there and do some really crazy stuff as a trailblazer, quite inspirational but am less keen these days.

Whilst I'm sure there is some truth in the fact that Branson himself and his holding companies don't pay or significantly minimise their UK tax contribution, it should be remembered nearly 10k people are employed by Virgin Atlantic in the UK and I'm pretty sure they all pay NI & tax.

it needs to be remembered that the eight thousand or so people that he employed , got dumped  , with no pay ,  if news reports are to be believed . if five hundred million pounds is going to be given in aid , it should be going somewhere that will get these people back into work , and not into bransons slippery mitts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mel b3 said:

it needs to be remembered that the eight thousand or so people that he employed , got dumped  , with no pay ,  if news reports are to be believed . if five hundred million pounds is going to be given in aid , it should be going somewhere that will get these people back into work , and not into bransons slippery mitts.

Agreed. It's good to see that the govt are at least not rolling over easily on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

Would you prefer to see nearly 10k people in the UK lose their jobs?

Obviously not, what what guarantees are there that by handing over this money there won't be significant job losses down the line anyway. No one knows what the airline industry will look like after this, and whether such a large fleet and workforce will be surplus to requirements.

Branson was lobbying for BA to be allowed to go to the wall when a prospect of state bailout was a possibility in 2008, and that governments should not step in to prevent companies going bust (his comments on this matter are worth a google).

But again, the issue is a moot point, the shareholders are in a position to raise the money themselves. It looks like it's back to the old big business model of profits being privatised  but losses nationalised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying it a long time now, things need to change, for far to long, the very rich, greedy and powerful have been reaping all the reward, for very little responsibility, I'm not against capitalism at all, an incentive is needed to encourage people to strive. But for big business and a very privileged, relatively small number of people to be allowed to make their fortunes off the sweat from other people's back, for little risk and no responsibility is totally wrong, they're basically robbing the masses, the only difference is it's allowed in law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I get the ideology, I hear plenty self-employed and small business owners justifying their "tax reduction measures" by citing the fact that big business and the very privileged also avoid taxes. If big business and the privileged are brought to order will the self-employed and small business owners fall in-line or find another justification for putting themselves first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mel b3 said:

it needs to be remembered that the eight thousand or so people that he employed , got dumped  , with no pay ,  if news reports are to be believed . if five hundred million pounds is going to be given in aid , it should be going somewhere that will get these people back into work , and not into bransons slippery mitts.

Exactly.

Edited by blackbird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

Whilst I get the ideology, I hear plenty self-employed and small business owners justifying their "tax reduction measures" by citing the fact that big business and the very privileged also avoid taxes. If big business and the privileged are brought to order will the self-employed and small business owners fall in-line or find another justification for putting themselves first?

Those with advantage and power should lead by example.....if their example is selfishness and greed, others will follow suit!
 

All the greedy, selfish ******** that panic bought everything, and as many of them as they could get their hands on, when the restrictions of Corvid19 were put in place, forced others to follow suit........if they didn’t join in there would be **** all left for them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, panoma1 said:

Those with advantage and power should lead by example.....if their example is selfishness and greed, others will follow suit!
 

All the greedy, selfish ******** that panic bought everything, and as many of them as they could get their hands on, when the restrictions of Corvid19 were put in place, forced others to follow suit........if they didn’t join in there would be **** all left for them!

Is that a yes or no answer to my question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

Is that a yes or no answer to my question?    


 There is no yes or no answer to your question, as it is something that may, or may not happen in the future!

However if “big business and the privileged are bought to order”....it’s more likely the former..........if they’re not? It’s likely the latter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Raja Clavata said:

Is that a yes or no answer to my question?

But many small businesses operate on a low turnover / low profit basis. Any "tax reduction measures" are often done to ensure survival of what can be hand to mouth operations for many self employed. Any financial benefit is not squirreled away into a non-productive account somewhere  but is instead spent on every day outgoings.

Contrast this with big business, such as Amazon, and their aggressive tax avoidance, with billions in avoided tax, much of it no doubt sat doing nothing being hoarded in the accounts of Jeff Bezos and the likes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...