Jump to content

Air travel - so unrealistic


Cosmicblue
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Its not so much about the safety of travelling on the plane, from what i saw on the TV the bars and restaurants in the resorts weren't paying much attention to social distancing. The holiday makers they interviewed in the resorts were all pretty much saying they wouldn't or couldn't be self isolating when they got back. One person said they (the Govt) couldn't change the rules half way through his holiday. Another person said he had to back at work on Monday and that wasn't negotiable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

Its not so much about the safety of travelling on the plane, from what i saw on the TV the bars and restaurants in the resorts weren't paying much attention to social distancing.

I guess it is up to everyone how much 'risk' they want to accept.  It is low for the young and healthy - but less so for the older and those in the heavy side etc.

13 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

all pretty much saying they wouldn't or couldn't be self isolating when they got back.

However - coming back and not following the rules is putting innocent other people at risk ........... and that isn't good.  I don't think there is any practical way it can be enforced though?

Edited by JohnfromUK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refuse any contact at work for 2 week minimum with anyone who has had a holiday abroad could be a way forward. All of GB had a stay at home policy during WW2 and there was pretty well no way around it unless you wanted to get shot at. Why now is it so hard to get the threat risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, bavarianbrit said:

Refuse any contact at work for 2 week minimum with anyone who has had a holiday abroad could be a way forward. All of GB had a stay at home policy during WW2 and there was pretty well no way around it unless you wanted to get shot at. Why now is it so hard to get the threat risk?

The general public are special exceptions these days, rules only apply to the old and home grown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/07/2020 at 11:16, AVB said:

I’ll be on a plane to Portugal as soon as it comes off the FCO ‘essential travel only’ list.
 

This virus is nowhere near as dangerous as it is made out to be if you are under 60 (probably 70) and in good health. 

Why stay in the UK when you don’t know if it is going to **** down with rain one day to the next. 

Good luck. Virus nowhere near as dangerous? It kills young and old alike if you get the infection.
Why stay in the UK? If you act like a **** you are more likely to catch a dose on a aircraft or terminal than a few days at Butlins.
Anyway, everyone to their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just air travel that's a nonsense its the whole set up, system and process of virus management (or lack of it). Where is the world beating track and trace system? Open pubs before schools? Masks in a shop but not in a pub? Management lost the plot they never had. 

Edited by oowee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vince Green said:

There is talk now of other countries being put back on the need to quarantine list. Travellers are being warned they travel at their own risk.

It was always the case that various travel restrictions would potentially be imposed if the rates of infection increased - and that would probably be applied on a 'by destination country' basis.  Travel has always been at the travellers risk - although FCO issues advice on 'risks' whether terrorism, unrest, or health related.  Take out insurance - or if you can't get insurance - the clear message is that the risk is too high!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oowee said:

It's not just air travel that's a nonsense its the whole set up, system and process of virus management (or lack of it). Where is the world beating track and trace system? Open pubs before schools? Masks in a shop but not in a pub? Management lost the plot they never had. 

You CHOOSE to go into a pub. Kids HAVE to attend school. 
 

I bet 99.9% of pubs in the UK this afternoon have more than adequate area to social distance. Schools, come sept will not and the attendance / contact will be pretty constant. 
 

Not an argumentative reply, just an observation. 
 

ps - schools never actually closed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oowee said:

It's not just air travel that's a nonsense its the whole set up, system and process of virus management (or lack of it). Where is the world beating track and trace system? Open pubs before schools? Masks in a shop but not in a pub? Management lost the plot they never had. 

I'm not too sure about the practicalities of wearing a mask in a pub! Are you suggesting the masks have a hole for a straw to be inserted? 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Gordon R said:

Doesn't exist on this planet.

It does, just not being used in this country,  South Korea were all over it, Germany were on it early doors,  no idea what's being used here??

It can't be effective when half the people can't be contacted. 

1 hour ago, markm said:

You CHOOSE to go into a pub

I choose to not go the pub, I can't stop work colleagues going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mice! said:

It does, just not being used in this country,  South Korea were all over it, Germany were on it early doors,  no idea what's being used here??

It can't be effective when half the people can't be contacted.

The south Korea system would not be 'tolerated' here because it does effectively track everyone using;

  • Credit and debit card transactions - they can show where someone has shopped or eaten, and how they have travelled across a transport network
  • Phone location logs obtained from mobile operators giving a rough idea of which neighbourhood someone is in as they connect to different phone masts
  • Details captured by South Korea's extensive network of surveillance cameras

It was apparently thought to be incompatible with our laws and also unlikely to be 'acceptable' due to being a very high degree of surveillance.  Bearing in mind some here consider having to wear a mask "severe invasion of civil liberties" - we have little chance of getting that past.  In south Korea there are cameras in most restaurants and coffee shops, and also on street corners and things like this to that are normally used to catch parking violations.  This information is used to track people who have been infected but also to trace their movements in the days before they tested positive so people who may have been in close contact with them can be alerted.  More details here https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52681464

Germany and other countries who rely (in part anyway) on app based track and trace have struggled to get more than a 20% uptake - which doesn't do the job needed.

Part of the troubles in the UK in following up contacts seem to be

  1. People don't use it and don't wont give their contacts
  2. Many of the 'hotspot' areas (Leicester, Blackburn, Hereford and Evesham farm pickers/packers camps) apparently have problems in that the track and trace phone service seems to struggle where people don't speak good English - hence getting information on contacts doesn't work.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnfromUK said:

The south Korea system would not be 'tolerated' here because it does effectively track everyone using;

  • Credit and debit card transactions - they can show where someone has shopped or eaten, and how they have travelled across a transport network
  • Phone location logs obtained from mobile operators giving a rough idea of which neighbourhood someone is in as they connect to different phone masts
  • Details captured by South Korea's extensive network of surveillance cameras

It was apparently thought to be incompatible with our laws and also unlikely to be 'acceptable' due to being a very high degree of surveillance.  Bearing in mind some here consider having to wear a mask "severe invasion of civil liberties" - we have little chance of getting that past.  In south Korea there are cameras in most restaurants and coffee shops, and also on street corners and things like this to that are normally used to catch parking violations.  This information is used to track people who have been infected but also to trace their movements in the days before they tested positive so people who may have been in close contact with them can be alerted.  More details here https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52681464

Germany and other countries who rely (in part anyway) on app based track and trace have struggled to get more than a 20% uptake - which doesn't do the job needed.

Part of the troubles in the UK in following up contacts seem to be

  1. People don't use it and don't wont give their contacts
  2. Many of the 'hotspot' areas (Leicester, Blackburn, Hereford and Evesham farm pickers/packers camps) apparently have problems in that the track and trace phone service seems to struggle where people don't speak good English - hence getting information on contacts doesn't work.

 

 

And long may we rebel against excessive state intrusion too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...