oowee Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 I don't see what difference this makes. I trust she will remain where she is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted August 31, 2022 Author Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 4 minutes ago, Gordon R said: I don't see what difference this makes. I trust she will remain where she is. I hope your right but you can see the window dressing going into overdrive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 I struggle to think of anyone (with a brain cell) who might want her back in the UK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Bear Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 1 minute ago, Gordon R said: I struggle to think of anyone (with a brain cell) who might want her back in the UK. Sums up the WOKE establishment quite well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amateur Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 4 minutes ago, Gordon R said: I struggle to think of anyone (with a brain cell) who might want her back in the UK. Andrew Mitchell, that well behaved Downing Street gate user, argued on today's BBC PM that all the disaffected persons with British connections held in Syrian camps should be brought back to the UK, on the grounds that they would be less of a risk to us here than if they remained there, oh, and Shamima Begum must have been trafficked as a minor for sexual purposes, so must be treated leniently. You couldn't make it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jega Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 Any doubts i had about this piece of scum were well and truly dispelled when the then home secretary said in response to a question in parliament about her. " If you knew what we know about her ,you wouldn't want her anywhere near England " Good enough for me ,leave the bitch to rot in what ever cesspit she is in . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 Wouldn’t surprise me one bit if she came back. We get what we deserve, and quite possibly, so may she. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossy835 Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 if they let her back she will only live of the taxes we pay.leave her there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clangerman Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 that’s settled then let’s ship her straight back for a very public trial and clear the gov not like it will come out they have been lying to us is it lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted August 31, 2022 Report Share Posted August 31, 2022 No - just leave her to rot where she is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 I do hope she's having a lovely time in Syria. We, as a country should show her the same type of disrespect that she showed to the UK when she decided to go over there and get involved in breeding radical little terrorists to prolong the fighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 12 minutes ago, TIGHTCHOKE said: I do hope she's having a lovely time in Syria. We, as a country should show her the same type of disrespect that she showed to the UK when she decided to go over there and get involved in breeding radical little terrorists to prolong the fighting. breeding little terroists....was the good bit.....from all accounts she was involved in a whole lot worse....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd90 Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 I’m just sat here wondering who’s fronting the cash for her to turn up in front of the camera well dressed, makeup done etc etc, and what’s their incentive? 👀 Some games going on behind the scenes as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enfieldspares Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 (edited) 12 hours ago, Jega said: Any doubts i had about this piece of scum were well and truly dispelled when the then home secretary said in response to a question in parliament about her. " If you knew what we know about her ,you wouldn't want her anywhere near England " Good enough for me ,leave the bitch to rot in what ever cesspit she is in . Ah well wasn't Parliament also told, once upon a time, that the British Intelligence Services had asserted that "“The Joint Intelligence Committee concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population, and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability.” I am sure that we'd be better off with the Begum woman not allowed to return to the UK and I for one think that she is a huge risk if she did ever return. A husband killed and three children dead her mind may well seek to blame Britain for that and then seek revenge on our people on a "eye for an eye". That is reason enough. She's likely always to be dangerous. She should not be allowed back. But I am cynical enough to question the absolute and total voracity of what Sajid Javid was told. For he talks the reason but the Government still does not publish the actual evidence. No she shouldn't come back....see my second paragraph as to why I have that view...but only the too trusting believe a Home Secretary justifying an action as "being in the public interest" and "for the nation's good". For an earlier one said that when the Govrenment banned handguns in 1996 and earlier put five shot shotguns on s1 in 1988. Edited September 1, 2022 by enfieldspares Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 Hello, what is this Canadian connection ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted September 1, 2022 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Lloyd90 said: I’m just sat here wondering who’s fronting the cash for her to turn up in front of the camera well dressed, makeup done etc etc, and what’s their incentive? 👀 Some games going on behind the scenes as usual. Russian money i would imagine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 19 minutes ago, oldypigeonpopper said: Hello, what is this Canadian connection ?? The individual that got her over the Turkish border into ISIS held Syria, was giving info to Canadian Intelligence, as he wanted to live there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Penelope said: The individual that got her over the Turkish border into ISIS held Syria, was giving info to Canadian Intelligence, as he wanted to live there. Ok thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 I still don't see how this advances her case. She wanted to leave the UK and become a terrorist. She did that, with the aid of someone connected to an intelligence service from another country - not the UK. Just what has this got to do with us and why is it being given media coverage by the BBC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oowee Posted September 1, 2022 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 43 minutes ago, Gordon R said: I still don't see how this advances her case. She wanted to leave the UK and become a terrorist. She did that, with the aid of someone connected to an intelligence service from another country - not the UK. Just what has this got to do with us and why is it being given media coverage by the BBC? I guess its news of interest to many in the UK hence the BBC report. Whilst i like most hope that she does not come here you can see the window dressing going on. I would reckon her odds of coming to the UK are better than football coming home. 54 minutes ago, Penelope said: The individual that got her over the Turkish border into ISIS held Syria, was giving info to Canadian Intelligence, as he wanted to live there. I did not look in detail but ISIS held Syria? I would be surprised if it's ISIS controlled as she still has her head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 Quote I guess its news of interest to many in the UK hence the BBC report. Staff at the BBC might be interested, but I suspect few of the public wish to hear anything about her, other than her demise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enfieldspares Posted September 1, 2022 Report Share Posted September 1, 2022 I am also old enough to remember the Matrix Churchill scandal. Yes the woman should not be allowed to re-enter the UK but there needs tp be enquiry into this Canadian "source". It seems to me people were being set up by that source to aid their own migration to Canada. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeon controller Posted September 2, 2022 Report Share Posted September 2, 2022 Is my memory that bad ?? It was reported at the time that the three girls sold family jewellery the buy the tickets to fly to the war zone. No mention of any other country involved?? The “ wokes” will try to get her back by any means forgetting the deaths caused by Isis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redial Posted September 5, 2022 Report Share Posted September 5, 2022 Leave it to Liz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.