scouser Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 All this talk about which presenter at the BBC is a bit naughty is getting on my nerves, all you have to do is wait a little and it will be in the Mail on Sunday soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12gauge82 Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 So much so, you made a new thread about it 🤔🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 Hello, did I miss the first one 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 it seems every body and his dog knows who it is 'cept me .....................fer christs sake pm me and enlighten me please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 I’m not too fussed about who it is really; but what puzzles me is why the mother of the lad involved went to the BBC rather than the rozzers, then when the BBC didn’t respond in the manner she expected she went to the Sun? 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 Hello, my thoughts to scully all though I read it was not about money 🤔, as for the BBC response 🤔🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweedledee Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 Harboured saville for years... absolutely no time for the BBC..stopped my licence... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 THE TRUTH WILL OUT.......................its just taking so bloody long suppose they will be bringing in Sir Trevor McDonald to read the news...thats if he aint at the cricket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westley Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 1 hour ago, oldypigeonpopper said: Hello, my thoughts to scully all though I read it was not about money 🤔, as for the BBC response 🤔🙄 It is NEVER about money ?? It's always about 'justice' or 'closure' .......Yeah OK ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 i rekon it is Cliff Michellmore.....either that or Fife Robertson.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnfromUK Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 4 minutes ago, ditchman said: i rekon it is Cliff Michellmore.....either that or Fife Robertson.... Reminds me of the Two Ronnies(?) parody on Cliff Mitchelmore - where he was called Mitch Pifflemore (and Melvin Bragg was Mervyn Pegg) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptC Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 15 minutes ago, ditchman said: i rekon it is Cliff Michellmore.....either that or Fife Robertson.... David Nixon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd90 Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 It’s definitely not Barry Chuckle 👀 I can see why organisations are cautious to release names and details, we are in a world and time of guilty until proven innocent, and trial by media. The person named should be placed on leave, whilst a full and thorough investigation involving the Police and other agencies is undertaken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbyduck Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 2 hours ago, ditchman said: it seems every body and his dog knows who it is 'cept me .....................fer christs sake pm me and enlighten me please +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rem260 Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 2 hours ago, ditchman said: it seems every body and his dog knows who it is 'cept me .....................fer christs sake pm me and enlighten me please Ditchy here you go. I have on good authority it is this celebrity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) good god ...NOT KIETH FLOYD PLEASE GOD 5 minutes ago, Rem260 said: Ditchy here you go. I have on good authority it is this celebrity. Edited July 10, 2023 by ditchman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Bear Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, Lloyd90 said: I can see why organisations are cautious to release names and details, we are in a world and time of guilty until proven innocent, and trial by media. The person named should be placed on leave, whilst a full and thorough investigation involving the Police and other agencies is undertaken. Yet I feel the good old beeb are fast enough to name names on the flimsiest allegation when it is a tory suspect whilst moving heaven and earth to cover up others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloyd90 Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, Yellow Bear said: Yet I feel the good old beeb are fast enough to name names on the flimsiest allegation when it is a tory suspect whilst moving heaven and earth to cover up others. You’re right there, they don’t allow the same respect to the people who’s lives their ruin to make ratings! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udderlyoffroad Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, Lloyd90 said: I can see why organisations are cautious to release names and details, we are in a world and time of guilty until proven innocent, and trial by media. The person named should be placed on leave, whilst a full and thorough investigation involving the Police and other agencies is undertaken. Bill-hooks. They would gleefully be reporting these things, including naming names, if it was any outside organisation. As things stand, the BBC have created a situation where people are forced to deny it's them, leaving a sort of 'Guess Who' situation. Terrible management. The MoD press dept did a similar thing to Dr David Kelly, incidentally. In any case, the presenter in question hasn't denied soliciting pictures of a young male, in return for money to feed his drug-habit. That kind of conduct should be instant summary dismissal, no need for 'placing them on leave', escort off the premises by security immediately, pass file to police. Instead of which its taken 2 months of inaction and his poor mother having to resort to going to the press. We all know the Beeb's bizarre obsession with protecting top talent at any cost. Had this been a lower ranking employee, their feet wouldn't touch the floor. And, disappointingly for anyone still hoping its Packham or Linekar, sadly it's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 The confusion seems to stem from the fact that no one as yet knows if any laws have been broken, and as I said to my OH, if this had been me back when I was younger, I’d have sent him pictures for half the price! Much better rate of pay than MY first job. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
humperdingle Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, Scully said: The confusion seems to stem from the fact that no one as yet knows if any laws have been broken, and as I said to my OH, if this had been me back when I was younger, I’d have sent him pictures for half the price! Much better rate of pay than MY first job. 👍 Polaroids back in the day, I suppose 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Yellow Bear said: Yet I feel the good old beeb are fast enough to name names on the flimsiest allegation when it is a tory suspect whilst moving heaven and earth to cover up others. Beeb being the Beeb. 49 minutes ago, udderlyoffroad said: And, disappointingly for anyone still hoping its Packham or Linekar, sadly it's not. For a fleeting moment, when I heard about this yesterday, I did hope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, humperdingle said: Polaroids back in the day, I suppose 😂 😀👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 14 minutes ago, Scully said: The confusion seems to stem from the fact that no one as yet knows if any laws have been broken, and as I said to my OH, if this had been me back when I was younger, I’d have sent him pictures for half the price! Much better rate of pay than MY first job. 👍 Is this not reason enough, whether any laws have been broken or not? In any case, the presenter in question hasn't denied soliciting pictures of a young male, in return for money to feed his drug-habit. That kind of conduct should be instant summary dismissal, no need for 'placing them on leave', escort off the premises by security immediately, pass file to police. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratlegs Posted July 10, 2023 Report Share Posted July 10, 2023 Time it was closed down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.